Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

Comparison of Multisine Peak Factor Minimization Algorithms for Aircraft System Identification

Abstract

Two phase-optimized multisine peak factor minimization algorithms are presented and evaluated. The first algorithm minimizes peak factor by iteratively clipping the peaks of generated multisine signals. The second algorithm optimizes peak factor indirectly through minimization of an approximation of the infinity norm of the multisine. Algorithm performance was evaluated as a function of different signal properties, including the number of harmonics, harmonic spacing, and number of snow harmonics (extra harmonics included for further reduction of the peak factor). The two algorithms are compared against results obtained by minimizing peak factor directly using a simplex algorithm, which has been a common approach when designing phase-optimized multisines for system identification flight tests. Sample results show that the clipping and infinity norm algorithms produced multisine signals with comparable peak factors that were lower than that of the simplex algorithm. However, the clipping algorithm runs an order of magnitude faster than the other two algorithms, which also makes it practical to repeat the algorithm multiple times to achieve even lower peak factors.

Related

  1. Variable Bregman Majorization-Minimization algorithms for nonconvex nonsmooth optimization, with application to Poisson imaging
    Maxence Adly, Alix Chazottes, Émilie Chouzenoux +2
    SIAM Journal on Imaging SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHAL
  2. On the bias distribution of pseudo-linear regression algorithms for recursive identification
    Bernard Vau, Henri Bourlés
    International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Epidemiological Causal Graph Identification: Challenges, Identifiability and Algorithms
    Sambit Mishra, Yingying Wang, Christine K. Johnson +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Recursive Multilevel Decomposition of Pairwise Comparison Matrices: Algorithms and Inconsistency Diagnostics
    Mert Çarboğa, Waldemar W. Koczkodaj, Yusuf Yaylı
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Large-Scale Comparison of Metaheuristic Algorithms via Behavioral Verification of Large Language Model-Generated Codes
    Emad Alharbi
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{matt2026comparison,
  title = {{Comparison of Multisine Peak Factor Minimization Algorithms for Aircraft System Identification}},
  author = {Justin J. Matt},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.28827},
  eprint = {2609.28827},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28827},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Comparison of Multisine Peak Factor Minimization Algorithms for Aircraft System Identification
AU  - Justin J. Matt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28827
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28827
AB  - Two phase-optimized multisine peak factor minimization algorithms are presented and evaluated. The first algorithm minimizes peak factor by iteratively clipping the peaks of generated multisine signals. The second algorithm optimizes peak factor indirectly through minimization of an approximation of the infinity norm of the multisine. Algorithm performance was evaluated as a function of different signal properties, including the number of harmonics, harmonic spacing, and number of snow harmonics (extra harmonics included for further reduction of the peak factor). The two algorithms are compared against results obtained by minimizing peak factor directly using a simplex algorithm, which has been a common approach when designing phase-optimized multisines for system identification flight tests. Sample results show that the clipping and infinity norm algorithms produced multisine signals with comparable peak factors that were lower than that of the simplex algorithm. However, the clipping algorithm runs an order of magnitude faster than the other two algorithms, which also makes it practical to repeat the algorithm multiple times to achieve even lower peak factors.
ER  -