Longitudinal Associations between the Built Environment, Biological Aging and Cognition
- 1University of Bath
Abstract
Features of urbanicity have been linked to poor psychiatric health in adulthood, but little is known about their relationship with biological age and cognition earlier in life.
Using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), we tested associations between the built environment and epigenetic ages (EpiAgeAltum, EpiAgeHorvath, EpiAgePACE) (n=2,452), brain age (n=751), and cognition (n=12,199). Analyses were replicated in Generation R and triangulated in the Millennium Cohort Study.
The built environment was not associated with epigenetic ages ({beta}Altum range = 0.013-0.015, p range = .466-.689; {beta}Horvath range = -0.011-0.023, p range = .182-.728; {beta}PACE range = -0.045-0.013, p range = .131-.524) or brain age ({beta} range = 0.022-0.028, p range = .337-.429). A negative association with cognition was observed in Generation R.
We provide no consistent evidence that childhood built environment exposure relates to biological age and cognition in adolescence, suggesting these relationships may emerge in later life.
Related
- Associations between community built environment and leisure-time physical activity among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Spatiotemporal associations between the built environment and carbon emission reduction potential of shared on-demand transit
- Associations of pandemic-era telework with cognition and depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older nonagricultural workers in China: a longitudinal CHARLS study
- Age-related biological dysregulation quantified using metabolomics is composed of distinct subsystems with synergistic associations to health outcomes: An analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
- Characterizing the association of neighborhood built-environment and type 2 diabetes-related clinical health outcomes: insights from the All of Us Research Program
BibTeX
@misc{sanders2026longitudinal,
title = {{Longitudinal Associations between the Built Environment, Biological Aging and Cognition}},
author = {F. Sanders and V. Baltramonaityte and M. Staginnus and R. H. Mulder and R. L. Muetzel and M. Vrijheid and E. C. Dunn and H. L. Fisher and C. A. M. Cecil and E. Walton},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.08.26365061},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.26365061v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Longitudinal Associations between the Built Environment, Biological Aging and Cognition
AU - F. Sanders
AU - V. Baltramonaityte
AU - M. Staginnus
AU - R. H. Mulder
AU - R. L. Muetzel
AU - M. Vrijheid
AU - E. C. Dunn
AU - H. L. Fisher
AU - C. A. M. Cecil
AU - E. Walton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.08.26365061
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.26365061v1
AB - Features of urbanicity have been linked to poor psychiatric health in adulthood, but little is known about their relationship with biological age and cognition earlier in life. Using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), we tested associations between the built environment and epigenetic ages (EpiAgeAltum, EpiAgeHorvath, EpiAgePACE) (n=2,452), brain age (n=751), and cognition (n=12,199). Analyses were replicated in Generation R and triangulated in the Millennium Cohort Study. The built environment was not associated with epigenetic ages ({beta}Altum range = 0.013-0.015, p range = .466-.689; {beta}Horvath range = -0.011-0.023, p range = .182-.728; {beta}PACE range = -0.045-0.013, p range = .131-.524) or brain age ({beta} range = 0.022-0.028, p range = .337-.429). A negative association with cognition was observed in Generation R. We provide no consistent evidence that childhood built environment exposure relates to biological age and cognition in adolescence, suggesting these relationships may emerge in later life.
ER -