Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Investigating the Role of Ligand Hydrophobicity and Ionization on Protein Retention in Mixed-Mode Chromatography

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Chemical Engineering
  2. 2University of Virginia
  3. 3Bio-Rad Laboratories,
  4. 4Process Chromatography Division

Abstract

Mixed-mode chromatography can offer superior selectivity and separation performance over its single-mode counterparts; however, many aspects of mixed-mode ligand design remain poorly understood. Here, a series of increasingly hydrophobic amino acid analogs of the mixed-mode cation exchanger Nuvia cPrime are investigated using a library of proteins spanning a range of isoelectric points, hydrophobicities, and molecular sizes. Although methyl and dimethyl substitutions produce no appreciable increase in protein retention, replacing the dimethyl substituent with an isobutyl group increases retention by approximately 50%, revealing a step change upon reaching a threshold ligand hydrophobicity. Notably, selectivity remains largely similar across the entire ligand series despite substantial differences in ligand structure. Because the hydrophobic substituents are also found to substantially alter ligand pKa, experiments across multiple pH conditions are used to distinguish direct hydrophobic effects from changes in effective ligand charge. Protein retention is found to be much more strongly correlated with ligand hydrophobicity than with ionic capacity, indicating that hydrophobic interactions dominate over electrostatic contributions across the ligands. The effects of protein isoelectric point and hydrophobicity are subsequently examined to further understand how protein properties influence the relative contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions on this ligand series. Highly hydrophobic proteins overcome electrostatic repulsion once a critical hydrophobic threshold is reached, with this threshold governed by both ligand properties and the intrinsic hydrophobicity of the protein. Further, a selectivity crossover is observed between proteins with markedly different electrostatic and hydrophobic characteristics, highlighting the importance of matching ligand chemistry to the properties of the target protein. Collectively, these findings inform the design of new mixed-mode ligands by elucidating how ligand and protein hydrophobicity and electrostatic interactions govern protein retention.

Related

  1. Times are changing but order matters: transferable prediction of small-molecule liquid chromatography retention times
    Fleming Kretschmer, Eva-Maria Harrieder, Michael A. Witting +1
    Nature MethodsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text6 citedAnalytical chemistryPhysical chemistryOpenAlex
  2. Simulation-Supervised Foundation Models for Retention Time Prediction in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography beyond Experimental Data Coverage
    Stephen Wu, Yufeng Han, Yasuhiro Mito +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryStatisticsarXiv
  3. Mapping Protein Conformation Ensemble Transitions Using Capillary Vibrating Sharp-edge Spray Ionization and Native Mass Spectrometry
    Mst Nigar Sultana, Vikum K. Dewasurendra, Mohammad Rahman +5
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPhysical chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Droplet Microfluidic Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange for Investigating Protein Dynamics with Millisecond Precision.
    Dietmar Hammerschmid, Jakub Sys, Alistair Bailey +9
    Analytical chemistryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedPhysical chemistryEurope PMC
  5. Enhanced surface hydrophobicity in the combined treatment of chaplins and rodlins from Streptomyces griseus
    Nurul Syahirah Shamsol Anuar, Noraiza Suhaimi, Kenshi Suzuki +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{ram2026investigating,
  title = {{Investigating the Role of Ligand Hydrophobicity and Ionization on Protein Retention in Mixed-Mode Chromatography}},
  author = {Janani Ram and Adel Nematipour and Raghav Kasi and Sushmita Koley and Chris Belisle and Camille Bilodeau and Nicholas Vecchiarello},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15011113/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011113/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Investigating the Role of Ligand Hydrophobicity and Ionization on Protein Retention in Mixed-Mode Chromatography
AU  - Janani Ram
AU  - Adel Nematipour
AU  - Raghav Kasi
AU  - Sushmita Koley
AU  - Chris Belisle
AU  - Camille Bilodeau
AU  - Nicholas Vecchiarello
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15011113/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011113/v1
AB  - Mixed-mode chromatography can offer superior selectivity and separation performance over its single-mode counterparts; however, many aspects of mixed-mode ligand design remain poorly understood. Here, a series of increasingly hydrophobic amino acid analogs of the mixed-mode cation exchanger Nuvia cPrime are investigated using a library of proteins spanning a range of isoelectric points, hydrophobicities, and molecular sizes. Although methyl and dimethyl substitutions produce no appreciable increase in protein retention, replacing the dimethyl substituent with an isobutyl group increases retention by approximately 50%, revealing a step change upon reaching a threshold ligand hydrophobicity. Notably, selectivity remains largely similar across the entire ligand series despite substantial differences in ligand structure. Because the hydrophobic substituents are also found to substantially alter ligand pKa, experiments across multiple pH conditions are used to distinguish direct hydrophobic effects from changes in effective ligand charge. Protein retention is found to be much more strongly correlated with ligand hydrophobicity than with ionic capacity, indicating that hydrophobic interactions dominate over electrostatic contributions across the ligands. The effects of protein isoelectric point and hydrophobicity are subsequently examined to further understand how protein properties influence the relative contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions on this ligand series. Highly hydrophobic proteins overcome electrostatic repulsion once a critical hydrophobic threshold is reached, with this threshold governed by both ligand properties and the intrinsic hydrophobicity of the protein. Further, a selectivity crossover is observed between proteins with markedly different electrostatic and hydrophobic characteristics, highlighting the importance of matching ligand chemistry to the properties of the target protein. Collectively, these findings inform the design of new mixed-mode ligands by elucidating how ligand and protein hydrophobicity and electrostatic interactions govern protein retention.
ER  -