Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Sparse concept attribution for histomorphological hypothesis generation from whole-slide classifiers

Abstract

Histology images contain rich morphological information and can provide insights into pathological processes. However, deriving hypotheses relating morphological phenotypes to clinical attributes is bottlenecked by a manual image interpretation step. Here, we demonstrate that this process can be automated through interpretable deep learning. We present SCOPE, a method to interpret slide-level classifiers by combining pathology-specific vision--language models with sparse concept attribution onto a generalist histomorphological concept bank. To measure whether such explanations recover known morphology, we introduce MorphoRecoveryBench, a benchmark of seven tasks with pathologist-curated reference descriptions. On this benchmark, dense concept attribution is indistinguishable from a random baseline, whereas sparse attribution recovers substantial known morphology; decomposing the pooled slide embedding reaches similar explanation correctness at a fraction of the computational cost. Post-hoc interpretation of whole-slide classifiers can thus generate morphological hypotheses at scale, for expert validation.

Related

  1. Cerebrospinal fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing for culture-negative anaerobic central nervous system infection involving Prevotella oris: attribution challenges in low-biomass specimens
    Yan Li, Minghua Fan, Yuyuan Hu +4
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyPMCCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. An immune world model for multiscale forecasting and therapeutic hypothesis generation
    Taoyong Cui, Xi Wang, Zonghang Li +11
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  3. HypoKG: Evidence-Disciplined Biomedical Hypothesis Generation Beyond Endpoint Knowledge
    Dominic Okonkwo, Adetayo Okunoye, Ismailcem Budak Arpinar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  4. Characterizing LLM scientific concept generation: A multi-dimensional measurement study
    Jalil Ahmadpour
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceStatisticsPLOS
  5. General Purpose AI for Public Data Analysis and Experimental Hypothesis Generation
    G. Jin, X. Bao
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{lazard2026sparse,
  title = {{Sparse concept attribution for histomorphological hypothesis generation from whole-slide classifiers}},
  author = {Tristan Lazard and Kenza Bouzid and Julius Hense and Shruthi Bannur and Daniel Coelho de Castro and Daniel Shao and Rajesh Jena and Drew Williamson and Stephanie Hyland},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.02985},
  eprint = {2609.02985},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02985},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sparse concept attribution for histomorphological hypothesis generation from whole-slide classifiers
AU  - Tristan Lazard
AU  - Kenza Bouzid
AU  - Julius Hense
AU  - Shruthi Bannur
AU  - Daniel Coelho de Castro
AU  - Daniel Shao
AU  - Rajesh Jena
AU  - Drew Williamson
AU  - Stephanie Hyland
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.02985
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02985
AB  - Histology images contain rich morphological information and can provide insights into pathological processes. However, deriving hypotheses relating morphological phenotypes to clinical attributes is bottlenecked by a manual image interpretation step. Here, we demonstrate that this process can be automated through interpretable deep learning. We present SCOPE, a method to interpret slide-level classifiers by combining pathology-specific vision--language models with sparse concept attribution onto a generalist histomorphological concept bank. To measure whether such explanations recover known morphology, we introduce MorphoRecoveryBench, a benchmark of seven tasks with pathologist-curated reference descriptions. On this benchmark, dense concept attribution is indistinguishable from a random baseline, whereas sparse attribution recovers substantial known morphology; decomposing the pooled slide embedding reaches similar explanation correctness at a fraction of the computational cost. Post-hoc interpretation of whole-slide classifiers can thus generate morphological hypotheses at scale, for expert validation.
ER  -