Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Integrative Thinking in Computational Physics Design Essays

Abstract

This study investigates integrative thinking in undergraduate computational physics design essays (CPDEs) within an engineering design-based introductory physics laboratory. Integrative thinking refers to the interaction of science, mathematics, computation, design, and metacognitive reflection during problem solving. Using the Ways of Thinking for Engineering Design-based Physics (WoT4EDP) framework, we examine how levels of integrative thinking can be characterized and manifested across teams with different levels of academic performance. We analyzed CPDEs from 14 student teams in a first-semester calculus-based physics course. Teams were grouped into high-, middle-, and low-performing categories based on members' final examination performance, enabling comparison of integrative thinking across academic performance levels. CPDEs were analyzed using thick description and an analytic rubric characterizing three levels of integrative thinking: superficial, intermediate, and substantial. Findings illustrate variation in how students coordinate multiple ways of thinking within engineering design-based physics tasks and provide a structured lens for examining integrative thinking across levels of academic performance.

Related

  1. Physics-guided topology-aware safeguarded unfolding for low-sampling computational ghost imaging
    Mengyi Cao, Wanqian Duan, Boyao Li +1
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsApplied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  2. Discrete Geometric Physics. Volume 1: Computational Topodynamics of Media. Volume 2: From Chaos to Infinity. — Complete Theory in a Single Document
    Ivan Davidenko
    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Peer-reviewedLicence not stated15 citedStatistical & nonlinear physicsOpenAlex
  3. Brilliance: toward autonomous computational research in particle accelerator physics
    Jinyu Wan, Yu Zhao, Wei Bao +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  4. Pupil Design for Computational Wavefront Estimation
    Ali Almuallem, Nick Chimitt, Bole Ma +2
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. Physics-Augmented Graph Transformers for Patch-Antenna Forward and Inverse Design
    Avi Epstein, Snir Nehemia, Haim Suchowski +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textComputational physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{babu2026integrative,
  title = {{Integrative Thinking in Computational Physics Design Essays}},
  author = {Sibatmika Babu and Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam and Carina M. Rebello and Jason W. Morphew and N. Sanjay Rebello},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.22154},
  eprint = {2610.22154},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22154},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Integrative Thinking in Computational Physics Design Essays
AU  - Sibatmika Babu
AU  - Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam
AU  - Carina M. Rebello
AU  - Jason W. Morphew
AU  - N. Sanjay Rebello
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.22154
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22154
AB  - This study investigates integrative thinking in undergraduate computational physics design essays (CPDEs) within an engineering design-based introductory physics laboratory. Integrative thinking refers to the interaction of science, mathematics, computation, design, and metacognitive reflection during problem solving. Using the Ways of Thinking for Engineering Design-based Physics (WoT4EDP) framework, we examine how levels of integrative thinking can be characterized and manifested across teams with different levels of academic performance. We analyzed CPDEs from 14 student teams in a first-semester calculus-based physics course. Teams were grouped into high-, middle-, and low-performing categories based on members' final examination performance, enabling comparison of integrative thinking across academic performance levels. CPDEs were analyzed using thick description and an analytic rubric characterizing three levels of integrative thinking: superficial, intermediate, and substantial. Findings illustrate variation in how students coordinate multiple ways of thinking within engineering design-based physics tasks and provide a structured lens for examining integrative thinking across levels of academic performance.
ER  -