Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Medicine

Clinical outcomes of needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery for 2–4 cm renal calculi: a propensity score-matched comparative study with subgroup analysis by stone infection status

  1. 1Department of Urology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Abstract

Purpose: To compare needle-perc-assisted PCNL (NS) and needle-perc-assisted RIRS (NR) with Standard PCNL for 2–4 cm renal calculi and explore effect modification by infectious-stone status.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort included 365 patients treated between January 2021 and September 2025. Two independent 1:1 propensity score-matched comparisons were constructed. The primary outcome was the 1-month stone-free rate (SFR), defined as no residual fragment ≥4 mm on KUB radiography. Matched outcomes were analyzed using paired methods, with Holm adjustment for the two principal SFR comparisons.

Results: Matching yielded 48 Standard PCNL–NS pairs and 86 Standard PCNL–NR pairs. SFR was 85.4% with NS vs. 72.9% with Standard PCNL (RD, 12.5%; 95% CI, −3.6% to 28.6%; exact McNemar P = 0.210; Holm-adjusted P = 0.210) and 91.9% with NR vs. 80.2% with Standard PCNL (RD, 11.6%; conditional exact 95% CI, −0.1% to 20.1%; exact McNemar P = 0.052; Holm-adjusted P = 0.104). Exploratory analyses associated NS with less fever and a smaller postoperative WBC increase but greater analgesic use. NR was associated with less analgesic use, longer operative time, and shorter hospitalization. Treatment-by-infectious-stone-status interactions were not statistically significant for NS or NR (P = 0.647 and P = 0.942).

Conclusion: SFR estimates numerically favored NS and NR, but superiority over Standard PCNL was not established. These exploratory findings support further prospective evaluation of Needle-perc-assisted surgery in selected patients.

Related

  1. Early Revision Rates and Clinical Outcomes of Two Cementless Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs at Two-Year Follow-Up: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Comparative Analysis
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Commentary on “Postoperative complications and mechanical outcomes following endoscopic versus open lumbar fusion: a propensity-matched analysis”
    Takashi Kaito
    North American Spine Society JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  3. Clinical outcomes associated with drug-soaked acellular dermal matrix after biportal endoscopic lumbar surgery: a retrospective comparative study
    Sub-Ri Park, Namhoo Kim, Hak-Sun Kim +8
    BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  4. Comparative health outcomes of buprenorphine versus methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study in the global federated electronic health record network
    Igor Elman, Mark Albanese, Krisha Panchal +3
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus with postoperative outcomes following single-level endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion through a posterior approach: A global propensity score–matched cohort study
    Phuoc Giau Dang, Yu-Pin Chen, Tan Thanh Nguyen +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismSurgery & anaesthesiaPLOS
BibTeX
@article{wang2026clinical,
  title = {{Clinical outcomes of needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery for 2–4 cm renal calculi: a propensity score-matched comparative study with subgroup analysis by stone infection status}},
  author = {Yuxian Wang and Peizhi Zhang and Zheng Xu and Daxun Luo and Yuzhe Tang and Jianxing Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1938484},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1938484},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Clinical outcomes of needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery for 2–4 cm renal calculi: a propensity score-matched comparative study with subgroup analysis by stone infection status
AU  - Yuxian Wang
AU  - Peizhi Zhang
AU  - Zheng Xu
AU  - Daxun Luo
AU  - Yuzhe Tang
AU  - Jianxing Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Frontiers in Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1938484
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1938484
AB  - Purpose: To compare needle-perc-assisted PCNL (NS) and needle-perc-assisted RIRS (NR) with Standard PCNL for 2–4 cm renal calculi and explore effect modification by infectious-stone status.  Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort included 365 patients treated between January 2021 and September 2025. Two independent 1:1 propensity score-matched comparisons were constructed. The primary outcome was the 1-month stone-free rate (SFR), defined as no residual fragment ≥4 mm on KUB radiography. Matched outcomes were analyzed using paired methods, with Holm adjustment for the two principal SFR comparisons.  Results: Matching yielded 48 Standard PCNL–NS pairs and 86 Standard PCNL–NR pairs. SFR was 85.4% with NS vs. 72.9% with Standard PCNL (RD, 12.5%; 95% CI, −3.6% to 28.6%; exact McNemar P = 0.210; Holm-adjusted P = 0.210) and 91.9% with NR vs. 80.2% with Standard PCNL (RD, 11.6%; conditional exact 95% CI, −0.1% to 20.1%; exact McNemar P = 0.052; Holm-adjusted P = 0.104). Exploratory analyses associated NS with less fever and a smaller postoperative WBC increase but greater analgesic use. NR was associated with less analgesic use, longer operative time, and shorter hospitalization. Treatment-by-infectious-stone-status interactions were not statistically significant for NS or NR (P = 0.647 and P = 0.942).  Conclusion: SFR estimates numerically favored NS and NR, but superiority over Standard PCNL was not established. These exploratory findings support further prospective evaluation of Needle-perc-assisted surgery in selected patients.
SN  - 2296-858X
ER  -