Sport-related neurocognitive performance and repetitive head-impact exposure in elite Muay Thai athletes: a matched athletic-control study.
- 1Major in Physical Education, School of Education, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
Abstract
Repetitive head impacts (RHIs) are increasingly studied in combat sports, but evidence regarding neurocognitive performance in elite Muay Thai athletes remains limited. This study compared neurocognitive performance between elite Muay Thai athletes and sprint-athlete controls and explored associations between cumulative RHI exposure and neurocognitive outcomes within the Muay Thai cohort. This cross-sectional athletic-control study included 44 elite male Muay Thai athletes and 42 male sprint-athlete controls aged 15-25 years. Controls were selected for group-level comparability in age, education, training years, and competitive level. Neurocognitive performance was assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Go/No-Go task, Stroop Colour-Word Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, Digit Span, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Task-specific outcomes and standardised domain-level indicators were examined using independent-group comparisons and covariate-adjusted ANCOVA models. Exploratory Spearman correlations examined associations between a cumulative RHI exposure score derived from self-reported proxy indicators and neurocognitive outcomes within the Muay Thai cohort. No significant between-group differences were observed in task-specific or domain-level neurocognitive outcomes (all p > 0.05), and adjusted ANCOVA models showed no significant group effects across the four domain-level indicators. Within the Muay Thai cohort, cumulative RHI exposure was associated with the executive-function composite (ρ = -0.32, p = 0.036), TMT-A completion time (ρ = -0.44, p = 0.003), TMT-B completion time (ρ = -0.41, p = 0.006), and Stroop interference time (ρ = 0.56, p < 0.001). No other associations were significant. Elite Muay Thai athletes did not demonstrate significant group-level neurocognitive differences compared with sprint-athlete controls. Exploratory associations between cumulative RHI exposure and selected neurocognitive outcomes were observed within the Muay Thai cohort but were not consistent across the broader neurocognitive battery. These findings should not be interpreted as evidence of generalised neurocognitive impairment. Given the cross-sectional design, retrospective proxy-based exposure assessment, and exploratory correlations unadjusted for multiple comparisons, the findings are hypothesis-generating rather than causal or confirmatory. Prospective longitudinal studies incorporating objective head-impact monitoring and repeated neurocognitive assessment are needed.
Related
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in Athletes: Optimizing Athletic Performance and Sleep Quality Through Neuromodulation
- Effects of high-intensity resistance training within concurrent training programs on athletic performance in elite athletes: a systematic review
- Neurocognitive training with visual perturbation improves dual-task hop performance in male athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial
- Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic bridge between childhood trauma and depression: Integrating emotion regulation flexibility, stress sensitization, and neurocognitive mechanisms
- A revised visual grading scale of the cavum septi pellucidi in contact-collision sport athletes with repetitive head impacts
BibTeX
@article{sulaiman2026sportrelated,
title = {{Sport-related neurocognitive performance and repetitive head-impact exposure in elite Muay Thai athletes: a matched athletic-control study.}},
author = {Raja Syed Tengku Sulaiman},
journal = {Frontiers in sports and active living},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fspor.2026.1908733},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953096},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sport-related neurocognitive performance and repetitive head-impact exposure in elite Muay Thai athletes: a matched athletic-control study.
AU - Raja Syed Tengku Sulaiman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - Frontiers in sports and active living
DO - 10.3389/fspor.2026.1908733
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953096
AB - Repetitive head impacts (RHIs) are increasingly studied in combat sports, but evidence regarding neurocognitive performance in elite Muay Thai athletes remains limited. This study compared neurocognitive performance between elite Muay Thai athletes and sprint-athlete controls and explored associations between cumulative RHI exposure and neurocognitive outcomes within the Muay Thai cohort. This cross-sectional athletic-control study included 44 elite male Muay Thai athletes and 42 male sprint-athlete controls aged 15-25 years. Controls were selected for group-level comparability in age, education, training years, and competitive level. Neurocognitive performance was assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Go/No-Go task, Stroop Colour-Word Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, Digit Span, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Task-specific outcomes and standardised domain-level indicators were examined using independent-group comparisons and covariate-adjusted ANCOVA models. Exploratory Spearman correlations examined associations between a cumulative RHI exposure score derived from self-reported proxy indicators and neurocognitive outcomes within the Muay Thai cohort. No significant between-group differences were observed in task-specific or domain-level neurocognitive outcomes (all p > 0.05), and adjusted ANCOVA models showed no significant group effects across the four domain-level indicators. Within the Muay Thai cohort, cumulative RHI exposure was associated with the executive-function composite (ρ = -0.32, p = 0.036), TMT-A completion time (ρ = -0.44, p = 0.003), TMT-B completion time (ρ = -0.41, p = 0.006), and Stroop interference time (ρ = 0.56, p < 0.001). No other associations were significant. Elite Muay Thai athletes did not demonstrate significant group-level neurocognitive differences compared with sprint-athlete controls. Exploratory associations between cumulative RHI exposure and selected neurocognitive outcomes were observed within the Muay Thai cohort but were not consistent across the broader neurocognitive battery. These findings should not be interpreted as evidence of generalised neurocognitive impairment. Given the cross-sectional design, retrospective proxy-based exposure assessment, and exploratory correlations unadjusted for multiple comparisons, the findings are hypothesis-generating rather than causal or confirmatory. Prospective longitudinal studies incorporating objective head-impact monitoring and repeated neurocognitive assessment are needed.
SN - 2624-9367
ER -