Does Balance Vary Across the Menstrual Cycle?: A Meta-Analysis with Implications for Women's Health.
- 1Auburn University
Abstract
Background: Women remain underrepresented across many domains of research, clinical science, and medicine. Sex differences other than the reproductive system, body composition, and size, are poorly understood. The menstrual cycle, for example, can be influenced using hormonal contraception methods. Hormonal fluctuations through the menstrual cycle go beyond the reproductive physiology and influence systems involved in balance and postural control. Data Sources and Methods: The search was conducted through the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, SPORTDiscus and Scopus (up to March 6, 2026) for studies that looked for the effects of the menstrual cycle phases on balance in women using or not hormonal contraceptives. Standardized mean difference was used to estimate the effect of menstrual cycle phases on postural control and Hedges' g was reported to account for the small sample bias. Two multilevel mixed effects models, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The funnel plot was used to determine if there was a publication bias. Thirteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results: For static balance tasks, the pooled effect size was small and not statistically significant (SMDH = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.41 - 0.02, p = .073). Similarly, no significant effect observed for dynamic balance tasks (SMDH = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.67 - 1.04, p = .44). The moderator analyses showed that contraceptive use did not significantly explain the variability in either static or dynamic balance outcomes. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that current evidence does not establish a consistent effect of menstrual cycle phase on static or dynamic balance. High-quality studies with standardized menstrual cycle verification methods are needed to clarify the relationship between hormonal fluctuations and postural control in women. Registration: PROSPERO CRD420261402114. Keywords: Balance, postural sway, hormonal fluctuations, menstrual cycle phases, hormonal contraceptives.
Related
- Feasibility of an anterior abdominal electrode array for non-invasive measurement of uterine contractions across the menstrual cycle
- Dynamic Changes in Endometrial Folding and Secretory Activity Across the Menstrual Cycle
- Genital Tract and Circulating CD8+ T Cell Phenotypes Vary Across the Menstrual Cycle.
- Hormonal Modulation of Subjective Sleep Quality and Perivascular Space Volume Across the Menstrual Cycle: An Observational Dense-Sampling Study
- Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive intake alter the electrophysiological signature of selective auditory spatial attention
BibTeX
@misc{roblescerdas2026does,
title = {{Does Balance Vary Across the Menstrual Cycle?: A Meta-Analysis with Implications for Women's Health.}},
author = {V. Robles-Cerdas and C. G. Turner and C. Brush and J. McGill and A. M. Skaarer and N. Baweja and H. S. Baweja},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.07.757426},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757426v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Does Balance Vary Across the Menstrual Cycle?: A Meta-Analysis with Implications for Women's Health.
AU - V. Robles-Cerdas
AU - C. G. Turner
AU - C. Brush
AU - J. McGill
AU - A. M. Skaarer
AU - N. Baweja
AU - H. S. Baweja
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.07.757426
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.07.757426v1
AB - Background: Women remain underrepresented across many domains of research, clinical science, and medicine. Sex differences other than the reproductive system, body composition, and size, are poorly understood. The menstrual cycle, for example, can be influenced using hormonal contraception methods. Hormonal fluctuations through the menstrual cycle go beyond the reproductive physiology and influence systems involved in balance and postural control. Data Sources and Methods: The search was conducted through the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, SPORTDiscus and Scopus (up to March 6, 2026) for studies that looked for the effects of the menstrual cycle phases on balance in women using or not hormonal contraceptives. Standardized mean difference was used to estimate the effect of menstrual cycle phases on postural control and Hedges' g was reported to account for the small sample bias. Two multilevel mixed effects models, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The funnel plot was used to determine if there was a publication bias. Thirteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results: For static balance tasks, the pooled effect size was small and not statistically significant (SMDH = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.41 - 0.02, p = .073). Similarly, no significant effect observed for dynamic balance tasks (SMDH = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.67 - 1.04, p = .44). The moderator analyses showed that contraceptive use did not significantly explain the variability in either static or dynamic balance outcomes. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that current evidence does not establish a consistent effect of menstrual cycle phase on static or dynamic balance. High-quality studies with standardized menstrual cycle verification methods are needed to clarify the relationship between hormonal fluctuations and postural control in women. Registration: PROSPERO CRD420261402114. Keywords: Balance, postural sway, hormonal fluctuations, menstrual cycle phases, hormonal contraceptives.
ER -