Efficacy of seaweed-based carbon dioxide removal reduced by iron limitation and nutrient competition with phytoplankton
Abstract
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) through seaweed cultivation has been proposed as a promising marine CDR approach due to its high afforestation potential and favorable carbon-to-nutrient ratios. However, recent studies suggest that the afforestation potential is constrained by iron limitation, and efficiency depends on relative stoichiometry with phytoplankton. Global CDR models overlook iron limitation and fail to capture how nutrient feedbacks with phytoplankton will reduce ocean carbon uptake. Here, an ocean biogeochemical model is used to assess how nutrient demand, affinity, and limitation influence the afforestation potential and CDR efficiency of seaweed cultivation. Iron limitation reduces afforestation potential by threefold after accounting for N and P limitation. Variations in nutrient affinity and demand cause large differences in CDR efficiency, from −43% to +78%. We show that if seaweed is less nutrient-efficient than phytoplankton, cultivation results in negative net CDR. Failing to account for these nutrient dynamics risks overestimating seaweed-based CDR efficacy.
Related
- Resource competition between buoyancy‐regulating and sinking phytoplankton species along a stratified water column
- Seaweed carbon removal cannot keep up with climate-driven loss
- Valorization of Beach-Cast Biomass from the Invasive Seaweed Rugulopteryx okamurae on the Moroccan Coast: A Comparative Assessment of Extraction Conditions for Sodium Alginate Recovery
- Beyond growth limitation: rethinking carbon dynamics at the alpine treeline. A commentary on ‘The role of elevation, tree height and crown position on the carbon balance of trees at the southern Andes treeline’
- Engineering perspectives on salt-induced transport limitation in saline aquifers: implications for long-term CO2 storage security
BibTeX
@article{berger2026efficacy,
title = {{Efficacy of seaweed-based carbon dioxide removal reduced by iron limitation and nutrient competition with phytoplankton}},
author = {Manon Berger and Lester Kwiatkowski and Laurent Bopp and David T Ho},
journal = {Nature Communications},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-73168-z},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05775066v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Efficacy of seaweed-based carbon dioxide removal reduced by iron limitation and nutrient competition with phytoplankton
AU - Manon Berger
AU - Lester Kwiatkowski
AU - Laurent Bopp
AU - David T Ho
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Nature Communications
DO - 10.1038/s41467-026-73168-z
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05775066v1
AB - Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) through seaweed cultivation has been proposed as a promising marine CDR approach due to its high afforestation potential and favorable carbon-to-nutrient ratios. However, recent studies suggest that the afforestation potential is constrained by iron limitation, and efficiency depends on relative stoichiometry with phytoplankton. Global CDR models overlook iron limitation and fail to capture how nutrient feedbacks with phytoplankton will reduce ocean carbon uptake. Here, an ocean biogeochemical model is used to assess how nutrient demand, affinity, and limitation influence the afforestation potential and CDR efficiency of seaweed cultivation. Iron limitation reduces afforestation potential by threefold after accounting for N and P limitation. Variations in nutrient affinity and demand cause large differences in CDR efficiency, from −43% to +78%. We show that if seaweed is less nutrient-efficient than phytoplankton, cultivation results in negative net CDR. Failing to account for these nutrient dynamics risks overestimating seaweed-based CDR efficacy.
SN - 2041-1723
SN - 2041-1723
ER -