Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Blind Unforgeability implies Plus-One Unforgeability

Abstract

We prove that quantum blind-unforgeability implies quantum plus-one unforgeability, settling an open question in the literature. Since plus-one unforgeability is known not to imply blind-unforgeability, our result establishes that blind-unforgeability is \emph{strictly stronger} than plus-one unforgeability in the quantum setting. The implication is proven using a new \emph{smoothing} technique that coherently rescales the query histories of a quantum-query algorithm in a black-box manner. This enables us to transform any successful plus-one attacker into a blind-unforgeability attacker with only inverse-polynomial loss. Our proof represents a conceptual shift from merely extracting a useful query history as in earlier attempts, which we show inevitably fails in general, to first coherently reshaping how query histories interfere.

Related

  1. Convex conservation of von Neumann entropy implies unitarity or antiunitarity
    Nicolas G. Underwood, Jonte R. Hance
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Local supersymmetry implies momentum map/Gauntlett-Pakis equations and vanishing generalized Komar forms
    Patrick Meessen, Tomás Ortín
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Nonuniform QCPH Collapse Implies QCPH Collapse
    Jeremy Ahrens Huang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Axonemal bending stiffness of Chlamydomonas cilia implies single-motor forces above 5 pN
    Maximilian Kotz, Veikko F. Geyer, Benjamin M. Friedrich
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBiological & medical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. One pure steered state implies Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering for two-qubit entangled states
    Qiu-Cheng Song, Joonwoo Bae
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{agarwal2026blind,
  title = {{Blind Unforgeability implies Plus-One Unforgeability}},
  author = {Mehil Agarwal and Calliope S. Reimann and Fang Song},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.00517},
  eprint = {2610.00517},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00517},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Blind Unforgeability implies Plus-One Unforgeability
AU  - Mehil Agarwal
AU  - Calliope S. Reimann
AU  - Fang Song
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.00517
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00517
AB  - We prove that quantum blind-unforgeability implies quantum plus-one unforgeability, settling an open question in the literature. Since plus-one unforgeability is known not to imply blind-unforgeability, our result establishes that blind-unforgeability is \emph{strictly stronger} than plus-one unforgeability in the quantum setting. The implication is proven using a new \emph{smoothing} technique that coherently rescales the query histories of a quantum-query algorithm in a black-box manner. This enables us to transform any successful plus-one attacker into a blind-unforgeability attacker with only inverse-polynomial loss. Our proof represents a conceptual shift from merely extracting a useful query history as in earlier attempts, which we show inevitably fails in general, to first coherently reshaping how query histories interfere.
ER  -