PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
On the types of quasiperiodic potentials and level surfaces of quasiperiodic functions
Abstract
We examine the similarities and differences between two types of quasiperiodic functions: those obtained by restricting smooth periodic functions in ℝN to lower-dimensional subspaces ℝn ⊂ ℝN, and those that arise as physical fields or potentials in quasicrystalline structures. Our analysis reveals that functions in these two classes share a number of common features while also exhibiting significant differences. As a key tool for investigating both classes of functions, we employ the Novikov problem - specifically, the problem of describing the global geometry of the level sets of quasiperiodic functions.
Related
- Arithmetic localization for quasiperiodic long-range operators with monotone potentials
- Energy Discontinuity of the Lyapunov Exponent for Quasiperiodic Schrödinger Operators with Gevrey Potentials
- Spectral Estimates for Compact Riemann Surfaces via Kähler Potentials
- Robust Observability for Schrödinger Equations with Singular Potentials on 2D Compact Hyperbolic Surfaces
- Singular wave functions and quantum collapse in inverse-power potentials
BibTeX
@misc{maltsev2026types,
title = {{On the types of quasiperiodic potentials and level surfaces of quasiperiodic functions}},
author = {A. Ya. Maltsev},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.34989},
eprint = {2610.34989},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34989},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - On the types of quasiperiodic potentials and level surfaces of quasiperiodic functions
AU - A. Ya. Maltsev
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.34989
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34989
AB - We examine the similarities and differences between two types of quasiperiodic functions: those obtained by restricting smooth periodic functions in ℝ^N to lower-dimensional subspaces ℝ^n ⊂ ℝ^N, and those that arise as physical fields or potentials in quasicrystalline structures. Our analysis reveals that functions in these two classes share a number of common features while also exhibiting significant differences. As a key tool for investigating both classes of functions, we employ the Novikov problem - specifically, the problem of describing the global geometry of the level sets of quasiperiodic functions.
ER -