Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Two questions on E0-like generic equivalence

Abstract

We answer Problems 8.1 and 8.3 from \cite{Tianyuan2026}. We first note that the condition attributed there to ordinary Prikry forcing is not correct as written: the appropriate formulation uses finite symmetric difference of the ranges of the generic sequences, rather than eventual equality at the same coordinates. We record answers to the two problems for both formulations. A length-ω Magidor forcing gives a genuinely Prikry-type example satisfying both conditions. Rigid real-adding forcing gives a broad source of further examples, and a forcing of Jech and Shelah shows that the condition does not carry any large cardinal strength. An E0-invariant Jensen-type forcing of Kanovei and Lyubetsky gives a stronger nontrivial example in which the generic reals in a fixed extension form exactly one full E0-class. Finally, a simple recoding turns the real-forcing previous examples into answers for the version of the problems with corrected condition.

Related

  1. Confusion in evaluating research quality comes from lack of clarity: The case for explicit research questions
    Matthew P. Fox, Amelia Wesselink, Katrina L. Kezios +2
    American journal of epidemiologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedStatisticsPMC
  2. The Eleven Questions : March 2016 - October 2026
    Alberto Farina
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. On questions posed by Gundersen and Yang concerning a certain binomial differential equation
    Xuxu Xiang, Jianren Long
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. A complete curve of genus 5 in the moduli space of curves of genus 3 and related questions
    Samuel Grushevsky, Christophe Ritzenthaler
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Spectral geometry: old questions and new answers
    David Krejcirik
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026questions,
  title = {{Two questions on $E_0$-like generic equivalence}},
  author = {Jason Zesheng Chen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.29641},
  eprint = {2609.29641},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29641},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Two questions on E_0-like generic equivalence
AU  - Jason Zesheng Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.29641
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29641
AB  - We answer Problems 8.1 and 8.3 from \cite{Tianyuan2026}. We first note that the condition attributed there to ordinary Prikry forcing is not correct as written: the appropriate formulation uses finite symmetric difference of the ranges of the generic sequences, rather than eventual equality at the same coordinates. We record answers to the two problems for both formulations. A length-ω Magidor forcing gives a genuinely Prikry-type example satisfying both conditions. Rigid real-adding forcing gives a broad source of further examples, and a forcing of Jech and Shelah shows that the condition does not carry any large cardinal strength. An E_0-invariant Jensen-type forcing of Kanovei and Lyubetsky gives a stronger nontrivial example in which the generic reals in a fixed extension form exactly one full E_0-class. Finally, a simple recoding turns the real-forcing previous examples into answers for the version of the problems with corrected condition.
ER  -