Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

On Standard perturbations of the Affine twist map

Abstract

For any t∈ℝ, consider the Affine twist map Afft:𝕋2→𝕋2 given by Afft(x,y)=(x+y mod 1, y+t mod 1). The map Afft clearly possesses an invariant foliation by horizontal curves. If t is rational, each leaf is periodic, and if t is irrational, the orbit of each leaf is dense in the torus. In both cases, the vertical rotation set of the proper lift of Afft to the vertical cylinder is reduced to {t}. Now, for k∈ℝ, define fk,t(x,y):=(x+y+ksin (2πx) mod 1,y+ksin (2πx)+t mod 1). We show that: 1) when t=p/q for integers p and q>0, KAM theory implies the existence of a constant kp/q>0 such that for |k|<kp/q, the vertical rotation set of an adequate lift of fk,p/q is just {p/q}. 2) when t is irrational, for any k≠ 0 the vertical rotation set of the adequate lift of fk,t is a non-degenerate interval which contains t in its interior. In other words, it is not easy to build area-preserving twist maps whose vertical rotation sets are reduced to a single irrational number. From Theorem A of \cite{eujul}, such a map needs to have an invariant foliation by Lipschitz graphs over the horizontal coordinate. In particular, all its iterates must satisfy a twist condition. This is precisely what does not hold for fk,t, for all non-zero values of k.

Related

  1. Persistence of invariant graphs for twist maps under analytic perturbations
    Qi Li, Yi Liu, Lin Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsarXiv
  2. The Zelevinsky involution, co-standard modules for quantum affine algebras and interval symmetric functions
    Matheus Brito, Vyjayanthi Chari
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Generating the twist subgroup of the level $2$ mapping class group of a non-orientable closed surface
    Ryoma Kobayashi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Bounds on Legendrian Double Twist Knots
    Viktória Földvári, Vera Vértesi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. On the length conjecture for twist knots
    Samuel Panitch, Mauricio Romo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zanata2026standard,
  title = {{On Standard perturbations of the Affine twist map}},
  author = {Salvador Addas Zanata},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.30665},
  eprint = {2609.30665},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30665},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On Standard perturbations of the Affine twist map
AU  - Salvador Addas Zanata
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.30665
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30665
AB  - For any t∈ℝ, consider the Affine twist map Aff_t:𝕋^2→𝕋^2 given by Aff_t(x,y)=(x+y mod 1, y+t mod 1). The map Aff_t clearly possesses an invariant foliation by horizontal curves. If t is rational, each leaf is periodic, and if t is irrational, the orbit of each leaf is dense in the torus. In both cases, the vertical rotation set of the proper lift of Aff_t to the vertical cylinder is reduced to {t}. Now, for k∈ℝ, define f_k,t(x,y):=(x+y+ksin (2πx) mod 1,y+ksin (2πx)+t mod 1). We show that: 1) when t=p/q for integers p and q>0, KAM theory implies the existence of a constant k_p/q>0 such that for |k|<k_p/q, the vertical rotation set of an adequate lift of f_k,p/q is just {p/q}. 2) when t is irrational, for any k≠ 0 the vertical rotation set of the adequate lift of f_k,t is a non-degenerate interval which contains t in its interior. In other words, it is not easy to build area-preserving twist maps whose vertical rotation sets are reduced to a single irrational number. From Theorem A of \cite{eujul}, such a map needs to have an invariant foliation by Lipschitz graphs over the horizontal coordinate. In particular, all its iterates must satisfy a twist condition. This is precisely what does not hold for f_k,t, for all non-zero values of k.
ER  -