Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

StreamLTT: Risk Certification for Policy Selection under Stream Dependence

Abstract

Learn-then-Test (LTT) provides a general framework for certifying deployment policies against a prescribed risk target, but its standard formulation targets a fixed population risk estimated from calibration losses. In sequential deployment, losses may instead be dependent and nonstationary, so the risk of a fixed policy can evolve with the observed history. We introduce StreamLTT, which replaces this fixed population risk with average predictable risk, defined by conditioning each decision's loss on the information available before its outcome is revealed. Conditional centering turns empirical deviations from this target into a martingale sum, enabling both a test that adapts to predictable variance and a finite-sample Hoeffding alternative. Combined with family-wise error rate control, StreamLTT yields a simultaneously certified policy region that supports subsequent deployment selection. Across seven forecasting datasets and seven deployment risks, StreamLTT places the certified frontier substantially closer to the prescribed risk target than IID, robust-variance, block-bootstrap, and concentration-based alternatives, while empirical family-wise error closely follows the prescribed level. A finite-sample ablation further shows that the predictable-risk formulation drives the tighter risk frontier, while adaptation to predictable variance makes more effective use of the available family-wise error budget. StreamLTT therefore extends risk-certified policy selection to dependent deployment streams by addressing both what risk should be certified and how it should be tested.

Related

  1. The Certification Exponent: Instance-Optimal Sequential Certification of Policy Improvement from History Dependent Logs
    Rui Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Finite-sample certification of coverage regret for budgeted document selection under adaptive stratified auditing
    Nora Serdyukova
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Scalable Variable Selection under Predictor Dependence with Adaptive Virtual Dummies
    Taulant Koka, Michael Muma
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Consistent Order Selection under Non-Identifiability and Dependence
    Eduardo Fonseca Mendes
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Exhaustive adjustment-set selection and causal effects for distribution-valued outcomes, with inference under latent Gaussian spatio-temporal dependence
    Hsin-Hsiung Huang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{xu2026streamltt,
  title = {{StreamLTT: Risk Certification for Policy Selection under Stream Dependence}},
  author = {Jinwen Xu and Qin Lu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04062},
  eprint = {2611.04062},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04062},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - StreamLTT: Risk Certification for Policy Selection under Stream Dependence
AU  - Jinwen Xu
AU  - Qin Lu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04062
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04062
AB  - Learn-then-Test (LTT) provides a general framework for certifying deployment policies against a prescribed risk target, but its standard formulation targets a fixed population risk estimated from calibration losses. In sequential deployment, losses may instead be dependent and nonstationary, so the risk of a fixed policy can evolve with the observed history. We introduce StreamLTT, which replaces this fixed population risk with average predictable risk, defined by conditioning each decision's loss on the information available before its outcome is revealed. Conditional centering turns empirical deviations from this target into a martingale sum, enabling both a test that adapts to predictable variance and a finite-sample Hoeffding alternative. Combined with family-wise error rate control, StreamLTT yields a simultaneously certified policy region that supports subsequent deployment selection. Across seven forecasting datasets and seven deployment risks, StreamLTT places the certified frontier substantially closer to the prescribed risk target than IID, robust-variance, block-bootstrap, and concentration-based alternatives, while empirical family-wise error closely follows the prescribed level. A finite-sample ablation further shows that the predictable-risk formulation drives the tighter risk frontier, while adaptation to predictable variance makes more effective use of the available family-wise error budget. StreamLTT therefore extends risk-certified policy selection to dependent deployment streams by addressing both what risk should be certified and how it should be tested.
ER  -