Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cognitive Processing
For-me-ness: a critical assessment of the phenomenal mineness thesis
- 1Department of Philosophy, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
This paper examines the claim that the phenomenal “for-me-ness” is the core feature of every conscious experience. Any conscious episode is intrinsically given as mine, and this mineness, while non-reflective and non-cognitive, belongs to the personal and phenomenal level. The compatibility checks for the for-me-ness thesis comes from cases such as depersonalization, schizophrenia, infancy and autism. I argue that this view lacks evidential support beyond the phenomenological descriptions it was built to interpret and that these phenomena receive better explanations that do not require positing for-me-ness.
Related
- Thesis presentation. Anorexia nervosa, deconstructing a concept to rethink care: A historical and anthropological approach
- Structure, dynamics and origin of the phenomenal space
- Gut consciousness: a perspective on visceral phenomenal awareness.
- Does Global Neuronal Workspace Theory Explain Phenomenal Consciousness? The Motivated Emotional Mind Challenge
- A critical assessment of LGN segmentation quality based on volume, contour, and location
BibTeX
@article{pereira2026formeness,
title = {{For-me-ness: a critical assessment of the phenomenal mineness thesis}},
author = {Roberto Sá Pereira},
journal = {Cognitive Processing},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1007/s10339-026-01383-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01383-z},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - For-me-ness: a critical assessment of the phenomenal mineness thesis
AU - Roberto Sá Pereira
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/04
JO - Cognitive Processing
DO - 10.1007/s10339-026-01383-z
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01383-z
AB - This paper examines the claim that the phenomenal “for-me-ness” is the core feature of every conscious experience. Any conscious episode is intrinsically given as mine, and this mineness, while non-reflective and non-cognitive, belongs to the personal and phenomenal level. The compatibility checks for the for-me-ness thesis comes from cases such as depersonalization, schizophrenia, infancy and autism. I argue that this view lacks evidential support beyond the phenomenological descriptions it was built to interpret and that these phenomena receive better explanations that do not require positing for-me-ness.
SN - 1612-4782
SN - 1612-4790
ER -