Human and planetary health implications of AI-generated diet plans: a comparative assessment using the EAT-Lancet framework
- 1epartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bezmialem Vakıf University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Abstract
IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to support dietary planning, with growing interest in generating recommendations that are both nutritionally adequate and environmentally sustainable. This study compared meal plans generated by three AI platforms, OpenAI ChatGPT (GPT 5.5 Instant), Google Gemini (Gemini 3 Flash), and Anthropic Claude (Claude Opus 4.8), across different clinical scenarios using the energy adjusted EAT–Lancet Diet Index 2.0 (ELI 2.0) together with carbon and water footprint indicators.MethodsDiet plans were generated by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude for five clinical scenarios (healthy, obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia) using an identical standardized prompt. Each platform generated three independent meal plans for each scenario. Nutrient composition was analyzed using BEBİS software, diet quality was assessed using the ELI 2.0, and environmental sustainability was evaluated by calculating carbon and water footprints. Differences between platforms and clinical scenarios, as well as output reproducibility, were analyzed.ResultsEnergy adjusted ELI 2.0 scores were comparable across the three AI platforms (p = 0.240). Water footprint differed significantly between platforms (p = 0.004), whereas carbon footprint differences were not significant after multiple-comparison correction (p = 0.093). Significant differences were also observed in several nutrient outcomes, and repeated meal plan generation demonstrated limited within platform reproducibility.DiscussionComparable adherence to the Planetary Health Diet did not necessarily indicate comparable environmental sustainability across AI generated meal plans. Future evaluations should incorporate both nutritional and environmental outcomes.
Related
- Self-Generated Goals in the Age of Foundation Models: Artificial Autotelic Agents and Their Implications for Cognitive Science
- Application of spectroscopic and multispectral imaging technologies on the assessment of ready-to-eat pineapple quality: A performance evaluation study of machine learning models generated from two commercial data analytics tools
- Neural oscillatory activity during guided and self-generated motor imagery: a comparative case study of a six-time World Cup skateboarder champion and an experienced recreational surfer.
- RNA3D-Decoy: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset of AI-Generated RNA Structure Models for Quality Assessment
- A visual perception-guided framework for camera path planning in large-scale digital twin and AI-generated 3D scenes
BibTeX
@article{oney2026human,
title = {{Human and planetary health implications of AI-generated diet plans: a comparative assessment using the EAT-Lancet framework}},
author = {Başak Öney and Solmaz Ece Yılmaz},
journal = {Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3389/fsufs.2026.1958219},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1958219},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Human and planetary health implications of AI-generated diet plans: a comparative assessment using the EAT-Lancet framework
AU - Başak Öney
AU - Solmaz Ece Yılmaz
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/09
JO - Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
DO - 10.3389/fsufs.2026.1958219
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1958219
AB - IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to support dietary planning, with growing interest in generating recommendations that are both nutritionally adequate and environmentally sustainable. This study compared meal plans generated by three AI platforms, OpenAI ChatGPT (GPT 5.5 Instant), Google Gemini (Gemini 3 Flash), and Anthropic Claude (Claude Opus 4.8), across different clinical scenarios using the energy adjusted EAT–Lancet Diet Index 2.0 (ELI 2.0) together with carbon and water footprint indicators.MethodsDiet plans were generated by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude for five clinical scenarios (healthy, obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia) using an identical standardized prompt. Each platform generated three independent meal plans for each scenario. Nutrient composition was analyzed using BEBİS software, diet quality was assessed using the ELI 2.0, and environmental sustainability was evaluated by calculating carbon and water footprints. Differences between platforms and clinical scenarios, as well as output reproducibility, were analyzed.ResultsEnergy adjusted ELI 2.0 scores were comparable across the three AI platforms (p = 0.240). Water footprint differed significantly between platforms (p = 0.004), whereas carbon footprint differences were not significant after multiple-comparison correction (p = 0.093). Significant differences were also observed in several nutrient outcomes, and repeated meal plan generation demonstrated limited within platform reproducibility.DiscussionComparable adherence to the Planetary Health Diet did not necessarily indicate comparable environmental sustainability across AI generated meal plans. Future evaluations should incorporate both nutritional and environmental outcomes.
SN - 2571-581X
ER -