Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Why three? A two-level system with four mutually unbiased questions

Abstract

Two sharp yes/no questions are mutually unbiased if and only if their involutions anticommute. A set of unbiased questions is therefore a Clifford algebra, whose maximal size is odd, meaning four anticommuting questions typically imply a fifth: the two-level systems of real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory allow two, three and five questions, while four is skipped. Without this operator product restriction, a two-level system with four unbiased questions exists as the four-dimensional Bloch ball, the hyperbit. The single-system postulates that pick out the Jordan state spaces allow such a model, and only energy observability rules it out. We show what it lacks, and realise it inside two qubits: its Kirkwood-Dirac imaginary parts are hidden so(4) generators, its composites allow entanglement but no interaction, and its 24-cell of states stays Spekkens preparation contextual down to depolarising strength 2/3. In fermionic terms, the four questions are the Majorana operators of two modes while the fifth is parity: the four-question system is therefore the sector removed by parity superselection.

Related

  1. Sharp Total-Support Uncertainty for the Standard Complete Set of Mutually Unbiased Bases
    Dongwei Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. More mutually unbiased bases
    Mateo Cárdenes Wuttig, Joseph Tindall
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
  3. Using topology to reveal all mutually unbiased bases in dimension six
    Mateo Cárdenes Wuttig, Joseph Tindall
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsMathematical physicsarXiv
  4. Mutually unbiased bases: common states, completion, and extension obstructions
    Hao-Yu Sun
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsMathematical physicsarXiv
  5. Strict non-tightness of the level-3 quantum bootstrap for a natural three-dimensional Hamiltonian, at an excited level
    Daniel Keren, Ye Zhou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hance2026three,
  title = {{Why three? A two-level system with four mutually unbiased questions}},
  author = {Jonte R. Hance},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.10078},
  eprint = {2609.10078},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10078},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Why three? A two-level system with four mutually unbiased questions
AU  - Jonte R. Hance
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.10078
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10078
AB  - Two sharp yes/no questions are mutually unbiased if and only if their involutions anticommute. A set of unbiased questions is therefore a Clifford algebra, whose maximal size is odd, meaning four anticommuting questions typically imply a fifth: the two-level systems of real, complex and quaternionic quantum theory allow two, three and five questions, while four is skipped. Without this operator product restriction, a two-level system with four unbiased questions exists as the four-dimensional Bloch ball, the hyperbit. The single-system postulates that pick out the Jordan state spaces allow such a model, and only energy observability rules it out. We show what it lacks, and realise it inside two qubits: its Kirkwood-Dirac imaginary parts are hidden so(4) generators, its composites allow entanglement but no interaction, and its 24-cell of states stays Spekkens preparation contextual down to depolarising strength 2/3. In fermionic terms, the four questions are the Majorana operators of two modes while the fifth is parity: the four-question system is therefore the sector removed by parity superselection.
ER  -