Ancient DNA preservation in the Caribbean
17 affiliations
- 1Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 2Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
- 3School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- 4Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- 5Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- 6Department of Anthropology, The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- 7Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- 8Museo Antropológico Montané, Universidad de la Habana, Havana, Cuba
- 9Archaeological and Historical Conservancy Inc., Davie, FL, USA
- 10PACEA, UMR 5199 CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, Talence, France
- 11Research Atlantica Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA
- 12Kelsey Museum of Archaeology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- 13Liberal Arts Department, Phoenix College, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- 14Department of Anthropology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA
- 15Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 16Trace and Environmental DNA (TrEnD) Laboratory, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- 17School of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Abstract
Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis has transformed how we study human migration, species dispersals and environmental change, but poor preservation remains a major challenge. This is especially true in tropical settings, where hot and humid conditions accelerate DNA decay. Because aDNA work is destructive, knowing how long DNA survives and under what conditions is crucial for selecting samples likely to yield meaningful data while minimizing damage. Here, we analyse low-coverage shotgun data from over 300 human samples from 33 archaeological sites (3300–400 cal. BP) in the Caribbean to evaluate the effects of sample age, sample type and burial context on DNA preservation. Preservation varied markedly both between and within sites, with sample type and burial context exerting strong effects. Macroscopic inspection, though imperfect, proved a useful first line predictor of molecular preservation. Decay-rate modelling indicates that DNA decays roughly 4× faster in the Caribbean than in temperate regions and about 14× faster than in subpolar settings. Under these conditions we predict that recovery from remains significantly older than approximately 5000 years will be challenging. Encouragingly, this window encompasses most of the region's human history, indicating that much of it remains accessible to aDNA analysis, provided suitable samples can be found and appropriate excavation and post-excavation protocols are followed.
Related
- Chloroplast genome assembly of Thalassia testudinum from the Caribbean Sea, and its evolutionary analysis with related genera
- Structural basis for the CsrA-dependent modulation of translation initiation by an ancient regulatory protein.
- Rapid screening of ancient DNA extracts through uracil detection
- Revealing ancient macroH2A features through in vivo analysis in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus
- The mannose 6-phosphate receptor system is ancient, widespread in eukaryotes, and functionally diversified in the human parasite Trichomonas vaginalis
BibTeX
@article{ramosmadrigal2026ancient,
title = {{Ancient DNA preservation in the Caribbean}},
author = {Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal and Miren Iraeta-Orbegozo and Kathrin Nägele and Maria A. Nieves-Colón and Marcela Sandoval-Velasco and Dorothea Mylopotamitaki and Yadira Chinique de Armas and Jason E. Laffoon and Zara Ali and Carlos Arredondo Antúnez and Robert S. Carr and Patrice Courtaud and Jane S. Day and William Pestle and Armando Rangel Rivero and Thomas Romon and William C. Schaffer and Peter Siegel and Anne C. Stone and Carsten Wiuf and Morten E. Allentoft and Hannes Schroeder},
journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1098/rsos.260217},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.260217},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Ancient DNA preservation in the Caribbean
AU - Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal
AU - Miren Iraeta-Orbegozo
AU - Kathrin Nägele
AU - Maria A. Nieves-Colón
AU - Marcela Sandoval-Velasco
AU - Dorothea Mylopotamitaki
AU - Yadira Chinique de Armas
AU - Jason E. Laffoon
AU - Zara Ali
AU - Carlos Arredondo Antúnez
AU - Robert S. Carr
AU - Patrice Courtaud
AU - Jane S. Day
AU - William Pestle
AU - Armando Rangel Rivero
AU - Thomas Romon
AU - William C. Schaffer
AU - Peter Siegel
AU - Anne C. Stone
AU - Carsten Wiuf
AU - Morten E. Allentoft
AU - Hannes Schroeder
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/09
JO - Royal Society Open Science
DO - 10.1098/rsos.260217
UR - https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.260217
AB - Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis has transformed how we study human migration, species dispersals and environmental change, but poor preservation remains a major challenge. This is especially true in tropical settings, where hot and humid conditions accelerate DNA decay. Because aDNA work is destructive, knowing how long DNA survives and under what conditions is crucial for selecting samples likely to yield meaningful data while minimizing damage. Here, we analyse low-coverage shotgun data from over 300 human samples from 33 archaeological sites (3300–400 cal. BP) in the Caribbean to evaluate the effects of sample age, sample type and burial context on DNA preservation. Preservation varied markedly both between and within sites, with sample type and burial context exerting strong effects. Macroscopic inspection, though imperfect, proved a useful first line predictor of molecular preservation. Decay-rate modelling indicates that DNA decays roughly 4× faster in the Caribbean than in temperate regions and about 14× faster than in subpolar settings. Under these conditions we predict that recovery from remains significantly older than approximately 5000 years will be challenging. Encouragingly, this window encompasses most of the region's human history, indicating that much of it remains accessible to aDNA analysis, provided suitable samples can be found and appropriate excavation and post-excavation protocols are followed.
SN - 2054-5703
ER -