Beyond conflict adaptation: Affectively experiencing and observing conflict enhance performance across conflict and non-conflict trials
Abstract
Conflict processing typically elicits control adjustments, as expressed by the Conflict Adaptation Effect (CAE), which could be mediated by negative affect. Recent findings further suggest that the affective experience of conflict, even without responding, improves subsequent performance on both conflict and non-conflict trials, suggesting a broader enhancement of cognitive control. To clarify the mechanisms underlying this general benefit resulting from the affective experience of conflict, the present study conducted three behavioral experiments using a confound-minimized Stroop task. Experiment 1 compared a standard “Do-do” condition with an “Experience-do” condition, where participants experienced conflict at the affective level in a non-response phase first, before carrying out the Stroop task during a second one. Experiment 2 replaced “Experience-do” with a “Look-do” condition, where participants merely observed the Stroop stimulus first (without the need to experience it at the affective level), before completing the Stroop task. Experiment 3 introduced a “Judgement-do” condition, directing attention to a conflict-unrelated feature. We found that conflict elicited negative affect and a reliable CAE in all “Do-do” conditions. Crucially, both affective experience (Experiment 1) and mere observation (Experiment 2) of conflict produced general performance improvements extending from incongruent to congruent trials (i.e., a General Adaptation Effect – GAE), with a larger benefit in Experiment 1 than 2. This improvement disappeared when attention was directed to a conflict-unrelated feature (Experiment 3), suggesting that it is tied to conflict-related processing. These findings suggest that affectively experiencing or simply observing conflict is sufficient to enhance proactively a general form of cognitive control.
Related
- Aging and Hearing Loss in Emotional Prosody Processing: Divergent Neural Adaptation and Behavioral Performance
- Beyond Steady-State Adaptation: Evaluating the Dynamic Performance of Biological Feedback Control
- Experiencing coordination with non-humans through role-playing: the "Ubuntu" game for engaging with non-human agency
- Inferring Geographic Origin of White‐Tailed Deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) Using Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in a Region Experiencing Long‐Term Effects of Chronic Wasting Disease
- ‘My dog is my life’: One Health approaches to healthcare for people and their companion animals experiencing homelessness in the United Kingdom
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026beyond,
title = {{Beyond conflict adaptation: Affectively experiencing and observing conflict enhance performance across conflict and non-conflict trials}},
author = {YueChang Wang and Shuangqing Si and Gilles Pourtois and Qian Yang},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/h35ej_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/h35ej_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Beyond conflict adaptation: Affectively experiencing and observing conflict enhance performance across conflict and non-conflict trials
AU - YueChang Wang
AU - Shuangqing Si
AU - Gilles Pourtois
AU - Qian Yang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/h35ej_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/h35ej_v2/
AB - Conflict processing typically elicits control adjustments, as expressed by the Conflict Adaptation Effect (CAE), which could be mediated by negative affect. Recent findings further suggest that the affective experience of conflict, even without responding, improves subsequent performance on both conflict and non-conflict trials, suggesting a broader enhancement of cognitive control. To clarify the mechanisms underlying this general benefit resulting from the affective experience of conflict, the present study conducted three behavioral experiments using a confound-minimized Stroop task. Experiment 1 compared a standard “Do-do” condition with an “Experience-do” condition, where participants experienced conflict at the affective level in a non-response phase first, before carrying out the Stroop task during a second one. Experiment 2 replaced “Experience-do” with a “Look-do” condition, where participants merely observed the Stroop stimulus first (without the need to experience it at the affective level), before completing the Stroop task. Experiment 3 introduced a “Judgement-do” condition, directing attention to a conflict-unrelated feature. We found that conflict elicited negative affect and a reliable CAE in all “Do-do” conditions. Crucially, both affective experience (Experiment 1) and mere observation (Experiment 2) of conflict produced general performance improvements extending from incongruent to congruent trials (i.e., a General Adaptation Effect – GAE), with a larger benefit in Experiment 1 than 2. This improvement disappeared when attention was directed to a conflict-unrelated feature (Experiment 3), suggesting that it is tied to conflict-related processing. These findings suggest that affectively experiencing or simply observing conflict is sufficient to enhance proactively a general form of cognitive control.
ER -