Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDMolecular medicine reports

Mechanical‑immune feedback regulation in distraction osteogenesis: From mechanotransduction to immune microenvironment remodeling (Review).

  1. 1College and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China.

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a well‑established regenerative technique in which controlled tensile forces stimulate de novo bone formation between gradually separated bone segments. Although traditionally interpreted as a mechanically driven process, accumulating evidence indicates that successful DO depends on the coordinated regulation of mechanotransduction, immune microenvironment remodeling, angiogenesis, osteogenesis and subsequent bone remodeling. The present review summarizes current advances in the biological mechanisms of DO and proposes an integrative mechanical‑immune feedback framework to explain how mechanical cues and immune responses interact throughout the regenerative process. During the latency phase, osteotomy‑induced sterile injury initiates hematoma formation, inflammatory cell recruitment and early cytokine release, thereby establishing a preparatory microenvironment for tissue repair. During the distraction phase, various mechanical parameters, such as rate, rhythm, frequency and local tissue stiffness, are sensed by mechanosensitive structures, including integrin‑focal adhesion complexes, primary cilia, mechanosensitive ion channels and cytoskeleton‑associated nuclear signaling systems. These signals in turn activate downstream signaling pathways, including MAPK, Wnt/β‑catenin, bone morphogenetic protein‑Smad, Akt/mTOR/NF‑κB and Ras homolog family member A/Yes‑associated protein/transcriptional co‑activator with PDZ‑binding motif, which collectively promote osteogenic differentiation, matrix deposition and vascular remodeling. In parallel, mechanical stimulation can reshape the local immune milieu by regulating macrophage polarization, cytokine balance, osteoclast‑osteoblast coupling and angiogenesis‑osteogenesis interactions. During consolidation, immune‑mediated remodeling, extracellular matrix maturation and coordinated bone formation and resorption contribute to mineralization and structural integration of the regenerate. Based on these phase‑specific events, DO can be conceptualized as a dynamic process involving mechanical input, mechanotransduction, immune modulation, vascularized osteogenesis and remodeling feedback. This mechanical‑immune perspective provides a structured basis for understanding heterogeneity in DO outcomes across anatomical sites, age groups and pathological conditions, which may inform future optimization of distraction protocols, biomarker‑guided monitoring and targeted immunomodulatory strategies.

Related

  1. Total Cranial Vault Remodeling Using Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis in Craniosynostosis.
    Cassio E Raposo-Amaral, Cesar A Raposo-Amaral, Enrico Ghizoni
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  2. Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Upper Airway Obstruction in Infants and Neonates: Airway Outcomes, Hospitalization Burden and Procedure Application in the Polish Population
    Patryk Kołodziejski, Aleksandra Kołodziejska, Sebastian Radziak +3
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Mechano-metabolic coupling in the tumor microenvironment: from mechanotransduction to protein lactylation and metastatic cascades
    Wenqing Zhang, Huimei Chen, Jingying Fan +2
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyCrossrefDOAJ
  4. Hydrogel-based reprogramming of the tumor inflammatory microenvironment: from mechanotransduction and dynamic materials to adaptive immunotherapy
    Jiansong He, Juan Wei, Jiemei Chen +3
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Altering host microenvironment is critical for success of cell therapy for osteogenesis imperfecta
    Sanja Novak, Ying Tang, Milos Opacic +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026mechanicalimmune,
  title = {{Mechanical‑immune feedback regulation in distraction osteogenesis: From mechanotransduction to immune microenvironment remodeling (Review).}},
  author = {Xian Wang and Yuetong Wang and Shixi He and Cheng Ma and Zhengzhong He and Xuanping Huang},
  journal = {Molecular medicine reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3892/mmr.2026.14038},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42852638},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mechanical‑immune feedback regulation in distraction osteogenesis: From mechanotransduction to immune microenvironment remodeling (Review).
AU  - Xian Wang
AU  - Yuetong Wang
AU  - Shixi He
AU  - Cheng Ma
AU  - Zhengzhong He
AU  - Xuanping Huang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - Molecular medicine reports
DO  - 10.3892/mmr.2026.14038
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42852638
AB  - Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a well‑established regenerative technique in which controlled tensile forces stimulate de novo bone formation between gradually separated bone segments. Although traditionally interpreted as a mechanically driven process, accumulating evidence indicates that successful DO depends on the coordinated regulation of mechanotransduction, immune microenvironment remodeling, angiogenesis, osteogenesis and subsequent bone remodeling. The present review summarizes current advances in the biological mechanisms of DO and proposes an integrative mechanical‑immune feedback framework to explain how mechanical cues and immune responses interact throughout the regenerative process. During the latency phase, osteotomy‑induced sterile injury initiates hematoma formation, inflammatory cell recruitment and early cytokine release, thereby establishing a preparatory microenvironment for tissue repair. During the distraction phase, various mechanical parameters, such as rate, rhythm, frequency and local tissue stiffness, are sensed by mechanosensitive structures, including integrin‑focal adhesion complexes, primary cilia, mechanosensitive ion channels and cytoskeleton‑associated nuclear signaling systems. These signals in turn activate downstream signaling pathways, including MAPK, Wnt/β‑catenin, bone morphogenetic protein‑Smad, Akt/mTOR/NF‑κB and Ras homolog family member A/Yes‑associated protein/transcriptional co‑activator with PDZ‑binding motif, which collectively promote osteogenic differentiation, matrix deposition and vascular remodeling. In parallel, mechanical stimulation can reshape the local immune milieu by regulating macrophage polarization, cytokine balance, osteoclast‑osteoblast coupling and angiogenesis‑osteogenesis interactions. During consolidation, immune‑mediated remodeling, extracellular matrix maturation and coordinated bone formation and resorption contribute to mineralization and structural integration of the regenerate. Based on these phase‑specific events, DO can be conceptualized as a dynamic process involving mechanical input, mechanotransduction, immune modulation, vascularized osteogenesis and remodeling feedback. This mechanical‑immune perspective provides a structured basis for understanding heterogeneity in DO outcomes across anatomical sites, age groups and pathological conditions, which may inform future optimization of distraction protocols, biomarker‑guided monitoring and targeted immunomodulatory strategies.
SN  - 1791-2997
SN  - 1791-3004
ER  -