Identifying land use thresholds for ecosystem service balance through supply-demand assessment in Hainan Island
5 affiliations
- 1Hainan Baoting Tropical Rainforest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, School of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
- 2State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
- 3Development Research Center, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100714, China
- 4Hainan Provincial Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Centre, Haikou 571126, China
- 5Hainan Baoting Tropical Rainforest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, School of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China; Sanya Tropical Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink Field Scientific Observation and Research Station, Sanya 572022, China
Abstract
Against the backdrop of accelerating urbanization, the imbalance between ecosystem services (ESs) supply and demand has become a major concern for regional sustainable development, particularly in geographically isolated islands, where spatially confined land resources limit the self-regulatory capacity of terrestrial ESs and amplify their vulnerability to supply-demand imbalance. Using Hainan Island as a case study, we integrated the InVEST model, random forest algorithm, and weighted linear regression to quantify the spatiotemporal supply-demand dynamics of five core ESs from 2010 to 2020, identified key land-use thresholds governing ESs balance, and established a dual-scale analytical framework at county and grid levels. The results revealed a pronounced spatial dichotomy of “coastal degradation versus central stability”. Central forests sustained surpluses in regulating services (Habitat Quality (HQ), Soil Retention (SR) and Carbon Sequestration (CS)), while deficit zones clustered in coastal towns. Contribution analysis of land-use types to the ecological supply-demand ratio (ESDR) identified built-up land as the primary negative driver of imbalance. Built-up expansion contributed to supply-demand deficits in Water Retention (WR), with mean ESDR values of − 0.0090 in 2020 and induced imbalance risks for Grain Production (GP) in half of the counties at the county scale. At the 500 m grid scale, 87.71% of the island maintained simultaneous supply-demand balance across all five services. Threshold analysis identified a structural land-use dilemma: attempting to achieve GP balance through forest-to-cropland conversion triggers a “denominator effect”, mechanically increasing built-up land proportions and pushing locally bound regulating services beyond their critical thresholds. This reflects an asymmetry in compensability, as GP deficits can be mitigated via external trade networks whereas regulating services are difficult to compensate externally. At the county scale, five management zones (“maintained zone”, “GP promoted zone”, “CS promoted zone”, “GP-CS promoted zone”, and “GP-CS-WR promoted zone”) were delineated to safeguard ecological cores and address spatially differentiated deficits; at the grid scale, 87.71% of the study area currently maintains ESs balance across all five services, with the identified land-use thresholds serving as early-warning indicators to guide timely regulation of built-up expansion. The integrated analytical framework established in this study is potentially transferable to other tropical islands facing land resource constraints, while the empirical threshold values necessitate site-specific calibration for regional adaptation. This threshold-based governance paradigm offers a practical and quantitative reference for alleviating structural trade-offs in ESs and optimizing ecological management strategies for land constrained island regions.
Related
- Identifying the thresholds of site condition and stand structure for optimizing multiple ecosystem services in the Liupan Mountains, Northwest China
- Critical soil moisture thresholds reveal contrasting ecosystem responses across the tropics
- Spatiotemporal patterns and bivariate spatial correlation of ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk in karst mountainous Guizhou, southwest China
- A geospatial and community perception analysis of the impacts of land use and land cover change on ecosystem service values
- Reframing ecosystem service flow with metacoupling model: Insights from directional water conservation service
BibTeX
@article{hu2026identifying,
title = {{Identifying land use thresholds for ecosystem service balance through supply-demand assessment in Hainan Island}},
author = {Wenjie Hu and Yichen Wang and Shuai Yin and Wei Cui and Junfu Zhao and Peng Wang and Wenjie Liu and Lan Wu and Zhongyi Sun},
journal = {Ecological Indicators},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115752},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115752},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Identifying land use thresholds for ecosystem service balance through supply-demand assessment in Hainan Island
AU - Wenjie Hu
AU - Yichen Wang
AU - Shuai Yin
AU - Wei Cui
AU - Junfu Zhao
AU - Peng Wang
AU - Wenjie Liu
AU - Lan Wu
AU - Zhongyi Sun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Ecological Indicators
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115752
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115752
AB - Against the backdrop of accelerating urbanization, the imbalance between ecosystem services (ESs) supply and demand has become a major concern for regional sustainable development, particularly in geographically isolated islands, where spatially confined land resources limit the self-regulatory capacity of terrestrial ESs and amplify their vulnerability to supply-demand imbalance. Using Hainan Island as a case study, we integrated the InVEST model, random forest algorithm, and weighted linear regression to quantify the spatiotemporal supply-demand dynamics of five core ESs from 2010 to 2020, identified key land-use thresholds governing ESs balance, and established a dual-scale analytical framework at county and grid levels. The results revealed a pronounced spatial dichotomy of “coastal degradation versus central stability”. Central forests sustained surpluses in regulating services (Habitat Quality (HQ), Soil Retention (SR) and Carbon Sequestration (CS)), while deficit zones clustered in coastal towns. Contribution analysis of land-use types to the ecological supply-demand ratio (ESDR) identified built-up land as the primary negative driver of imbalance. Built-up expansion contributed to supply-demand deficits in Water Retention (WR), with mean ESDR values of − 0.0090 in 2020 and induced imbalance risks for Grain Production (GP) in half of the counties at the county scale. At the 500 m grid scale, 87.71% of the island maintained simultaneous supply-demand balance across all five services. Threshold analysis identified a structural land-use dilemma: attempting to achieve GP balance through forest-to-cropland conversion triggers a “denominator effect”, mechanically increasing built-up land proportions and pushing locally bound regulating services beyond their critical thresholds. This reflects an asymmetry in compensability, as GP deficits can be mitigated via external trade networks whereas regulating services are difficult to compensate externally. At the county scale, five management zones (“maintained zone”, “GP promoted zone”, “CS promoted zone”, “GP-CS promoted zone”, and “GP-CS-WR promoted zone”) were delineated to safeguard ecological cores and address spatially differentiated deficits; at the grid scale, 87.71% of the study area currently maintains ESs balance across all five services, with the identified land-use thresholds serving as early-warning indicators to guide timely regulation of built-up expansion. The integrated analytical framework established in this study is potentially transferable to other tropical islands facing land resource constraints, while the empirical threshold values necessitate site-specific calibration for regional adaptation. This threshold-based governance paradigm offers a practical and quantitative reference for alleviating structural trade-offs in ESs and optimizing ecological management strategies for land constrained island regions.
SN - 1470-160X
SN - 1872-7034
ER -