Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Public Health

Association of social isolation and loneliness with years of life lost across healthy lifestyle levels

  1. 1School of Public Health, The Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China
  2. 2Department of Scientific Research, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102 China

Abstract

Background: Social isolation (SI) and loneliness are prevalent worldwide; however, their associations with life expectancy and whether these associations vary across healthy lifestyle levels remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the associations of SI and loneliness with all-cause mortality and years of life lost (YLL), and to examine whether these associations varied across healthy lifestyle levels.

Methods: Data from the UK Biobank were analyzed. SI and loneliness were assessed using established questionnaire-based measures, and healthy lifestyle was evaluated using a composite score based on five modifiable lifestyle behaviors. Flexible parametric Royston-Parmar survival models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and derive YLL estimates associated with SI and loneliness, both overall and within healthy lifestyle score (HLS) strata.

Results: Compared with participants aged 40 years with no social isolation and loneliness, those with only loneliness, only social isolation, and social isolation with loneliness had estimated YLLs of 0.81[95%CI:0.49–1.14], 1.02[95%CI:0.80–1.24], and 2.21[95%CI:1.83–2.58], respectively. Similar patterns were observed among participants aged 45, 60, and 65 years. At the age of 40 years, among participants with low HLS, the YLLs associated with only loneliness, only social isolation, and social isolation with loneliness were 1.05[95%CI:0.57–1.53], 1.48[95%CI:1.13–1.83], and 2.36[95%CI:1.83–2.88], while among participants with high HLS, the corresponding YLLs were 0.17[95%CI:-0.45-0.80], 0.47[95%CI:0.06–0.89], and 1.39[95%CI:0.66–2.11]. A similar pattern was also observed among participants aged 45, 60, and 65 years.

Conclusions: SI and loneliness were each associated with YLL, and their co-occurrence was associated with greater YLL than either condition alone. YLL estimates associated with SI and loneliness were numerically smaller at higher HLS levels.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28852-6.

Related

  1. Social isolation, self-perceived loneliness, and the 7-year trajectories of depression and cognitive decline: a prospective cohort study
    Yuting Shen, Yonghui Shen
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Social isolation, loneliness, and cognitive decline among Black Americans: the moderating role of neighborhood context
    Ann W Nguyen, Chuwen Zhong, Kedong Ding +3
    The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. Associations of social isolation and loneliness with physical and mental health in middle-aged and older adults: an 18-country multicohort study
    Yudong Miao, Zhanlei Shen, Dongfang Zhu +9
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  4. Co-producing innovations for organizations to address social isolation and loneliness among marginalized older adults and caregivers: the Connect!Âge project
    Andrew Wister, Mélanie Levasseur, Boah Kim +9
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. The underlying neurobiology of social isolation and loneliness in middle-older adults: A systematic review.
    Jade Guarnera, Katherine Kenyon, Neel Joshi +3
    Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{gao2026association,
  title = {{Association of social isolation and loneliness with years of life lost across healthy lifestyle levels}},
  author = {Junling Gao and Yongkai Zhu and Shitong Yang and Junjia Jiang and Jingjie Zhu},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28852-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28852-6},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Association of social isolation and loneliness with years of life lost across healthy lifestyle levels
AU  - Junling Gao
AU  - Yongkai Zhu
AU  - Shitong Yang
AU  - Junjia Jiang
AU  - Jingjie Zhu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/11
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-28852-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28852-6
AB  - Background: Social isolation (SI) and loneliness are prevalent worldwide; however, their associations with life expectancy and whether these associations vary across healthy lifestyle levels remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the associations of SI and loneliness with all-cause mortality and years of life lost (YLL), and to examine whether these associations varied across healthy lifestyle levels.  Methods: Data from the UK Biobank were analyzed. SI and loneliness were assessed using established questionnaire-based measures, and healthy lifestyle was evaluated using a composite score based on five modifiable lifestyle behaviors. Flexible parametric Royston-Parmar survival models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and derive YLL estimates associated with SI and loneliness, both overall and within healthy lifestyle score (HLS) strata.  Results: Compared with participants aged 40 years with no social isolation and loneliness, those with only loneliness, only social isolation, and social isolation with loneliness had estimated YLLs of 0.81[95%CI:0.49–1.14], 1.02[95%CI:0.80–1.24], and 2.21[95%CI:1.83–2.58], respectively. Similar patterns were observed among participants aged 45, 60, and 65 years. At the age of 40 years, among participants with low HLS, the YLLs associated with only loneliness, only social isolation, and social isolation with loneliness were 1.05[95%CI:0.57–1.53], 1.48[95%CI:1.13–1.83], and 2.36[95%CI:1.83–2.88], while among participants with high HLS, the corresponding YLLs were 0.17[95%CI:-0.45-0.80], 0.47[95%CI:0.06–0.89], and 1.39[95%CI:0.66–2.11]. A similar pattern was also observed among participants aged 45, 60, and 65 years.  Conclusions: SI and loneliness were each associated with YLL, and their co-occurrence was associated with greater YLL than either condition alone. YLL estimates associated with SI and loneliness were numerically smaller at higher HLS levels.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28852-6.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -