Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Physical Review Research

Large time-step discretization of adiabatic quantum dynamics

4 affiliations
  1. 1Peking University
  2. 2University of Maryland, College Park
  3. 3ContinoQuantum
  4. 4Macquarie University

Abstract

Adiabatic quantum computing is a general framework for preparing eigenstates of Hamiltonians on quantum devices. However, its digital implementation requires an efficient Hamiltonian simulation subroutine, which may introduce extra computational overhead or complicated quantum control logic. In this work, we show that the time-step sizes in time discretization can be much larger than expected, and the overall complexity is greatly reduced. Remarkably, regardless of the general convergence order of the numerical method, we can choose a uniform time-step size independent of tolerated error and evolution time for sufficiently accurate simulation. Furthermore, with the boundary cancellation condition where the continuous diabatic errors are exponentially suppressed, we provide strong evidence for a superpolynomial convergence of first-order Trotter with uniform time-step size. We apply our analysis to the example of adiabatic unstructured search and show several preferable features of the Trotterized adiabatic approach: It can match the Grover lower bound, it does not require knowledge of the number of marked states, and its performance can be asymptotically comparable with that of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm.

Versions

Related

  1. Euler Time-Discretization of Funnel-Controlled Dynamics
    Thomas Berger, Hannes Gernandt, Pushya Mitra
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Latent Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-Driven Log-ARCH Models: Continuous-Time Stochastic Dynamics, Exact Discretization, and Long-Span QML Theory
    Yue Su
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  3. Large time nonlinear dynamics close to inhomogeneous stationary states of the Vlasov-HMF model
    Erwan Faou, Frédéric Rousset, Tooryanand Seetohul
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Large time dynamics for non-autonomous weakly damped KdV-Burgers equations on the real line
    Cung The Anh, Nesibe Ayhan, Bao Quoc Tang +1
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Stability, discretization, and optimality of continuous-time causal optimal transport
    Yifan Jiang, Fang Rui Lim
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@article{an2026large,
  title = {{Large time-step discretization of adiabatic quantum dynamics}},
  author = {Dong An and Pedro C. S. Costa and Dominic W. Berry},
  journal = {Physical Review Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1103/kh4h-m8z9},
  url = {http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kh4h-m8z9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Large time-step discretization of adiabatic quantum dynamics
AU  - Dong An
AU  - Pedro C. S. Costa
AU  - Dominic W. Berry
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Physical Review Research
DO  - 10.1103/kh4h-m8z9
UR  - http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/kh4h-m8z9
AB  - Adiabatic quantum computing is a general framework for preparing eigenstates of Hamiltonians on quantum devices. However, its digital implementation requires an efficient Hamiltonian simulation subroutine, which may introduce extra computational overhead or complicated quantum control logic. In this work, we show that the time-step sizes in time discretization can be much larger than expected, and the overall complexity is greatly reduced. Remarkably, regardless of the general convergence order of the numerical method, we can choose a uniform time-step size independent of tolerated error and evolution time for sufficiently accurate simulation. Furthermore, with the boundary cancellation condition where the continuous diabatic errors are exponentially suppressed, we provide strong evidence for a superpolynomial convergence of first-order Trotter with uniform time-step size. We apply our analysis to the example of adiabatic unstructured search and show several preferable features of the Trotterized adiabatic approach: It can match the Grover lower bound, it does not require knowledge of the number of marked states, and its performance can be asymptotically comparable with that of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm.
SN  - 2643-1564
ER  -