Toward organizational agility in universities of medical sciences: a social responsibility approach-an integrative review.
- 1Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
- 2Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. [email protected].
- 3Cardiovascular Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Institute, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Social responsibility in medical education requires universities of medical sciences to align their educational systems with the health needs of society, yet evidence from Iran suggests a persistent gap between academic education and real societal demands. In rapidly changing health systems, organizational agility through dynamic capabilities and empowerment may help universities better fulfill this mission. Therefore, this integrative review examined components shaping organizational agility in the educational system of universities of medical sciences from a social responsibility perspective.Method
We conducted an integrative review following Whittemore & knafl's five-step framework (problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation). A comprehensive search of international and national databases, supplemented by grey literature and reference list screening, was conducted without time limit until September 11, 2025. The identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of records were reported using PRISMA 2020 as a reporting guideline only. Eligible studies were appraised using design-appropriate tools (MMAT, SANRA, JBI, CASP), and their findings were synthesized through a hybrid framework-guided deductive-inductive content analysis informed by the agility model of Ghane Ebadi et al. RESULT: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Across a diverse contexts, recurring components of organizational agility and university social responsibility converged into two interrelated pillars: educational empowerment and educational dynamic capabilities. Educational empowerment included structural and human asset empowerment in education, while educational dynamic capabilities comprised the capabilities of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguration. Both pillars were consistently interpreted through a social responsibility lens, emphasizing responsibility, equity, transparency, and stakeholder engagement.Conclusion
The resulting framework reconceptualizes organizational agility in medical universities as "responsible agility," in which educational empowerment and educational dynamic capabilities are intentionally aligned with social responsibility to guide governance, curriculum design, and stakeholder-driven educational reforms.
Related
- Barriers to Implementing Convergence Science in Universities of Medical Sciences in the Northwest of Iran
- Healthcare Organizational Resilience: A Systematic Review and Integrative Framework of Factors, Capabilities, Outcomes, and Context
- Relationships between reactive agility and athletic performance parameters: a preliminary study
- Reactive Agility Performance in Older Adults: Associations With Muscle Health and Functional Performance
- Estimation of aerobic and anaerobic performance using a novel intermittent reactive agility test – An exploratory correlation study
BibTeX
@article{mishabi2026toward,
title = {{Toward organizational agility in universities of medical sciences: a social responsibility approach-an integrative review.}},
author = {Mohammad Arabsorkhi Mishabi and Maryam Avizhgan and Shahram Shayan},
journal = {BMC medical education},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-09919-9},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907863},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Toward organizational agility in universities of medical sciences: a social responsibility approach-an integrative review.
AU - Mohammad Arabsorkhi Mishabi
AU - Maryam Avizhgan
AU - Shahram Shayan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC medical education
DO - 10.1186/s12909-026-09919-9
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907863
AB - Background Social responsibility in medical education requires universities of medical sciences to align their educational systems with the health needs of society, yet evidence from Iran suggests a persistent gap between academic education and real societal demands. In rapidly changing health systems, organizational agility through dynamic capabilities and empowerment may help universities better fulfill this mission. Therefore, this integrative review examined components shaping organizational agility in the educational system of universities of medical sciences from a social responsibility perspective.Method We conducted an integrative review following Whittemore & knafl's five-step framework (problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation). A comprehensive search of international and national databases, supplemented by grey literature and reference list screening, was conducted without time limit until September 11, 2025. The identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of records were reported using PRISMA 2020 as a reporting guideline only. Eligible studies were appraised using design-appropriate tools (MMAT, SANRA, JBI, CASP), and their findings were synthesized through a hybrid framework-guided deductive-inductive content analysis informed by the agility model of Ghane Ebadi et al. RESULT: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Across a diverse contexts, recurring components of organizational agility and university social responsibility converged into two interrelated pillars: educational empowerment and educational dynamic capabilities. Educational empowerment included structural and human asset empowerment in education, while educational dynamic capabilities comprised the capabilities of sensing, seizing, and reconfiguration. Both pillars were consistently interpreted through a social responsibility lens, emphasizing responsibility, equity, transparency, and stakeholder engagement.Conclusion The resulting framework reconceptualizes organizational agility in medical universities as "responsible agility," in which educational empowerment and educational dynamic capabilities are intentionally aligned with social responsibility to guide governance, curriculum design, and stakeholder-driven educational reforms.
SN - 1472-6920
ER -