Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Coupling demography and interactions reshapes the structural stability of ecological communities

  1. 1Estacion Biologica de Donana, CSIC

Abstract

The assembly of ecological communities depends on both species' demography and the interactions among them. Ecological theory assumes that both ecological processes vary independently. However, empirical evidence demonstrates otherwise. How the structural stability of ecological communities changes when species' intrinsic growth rates and interactions are coupled remains unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we present several seemingly disconnected examples, such as the stress-gradient hypothesis, the covariance between environment and competition, higher-order interactions, and niche packing, that actually fall along a continuum of changes ranging from positive to negative interactions. Although the specific details of each scenario differ, they all share a common feature. When demography and interactions are coupled in multispecies models of population dynamics, the limits of structural stability in ecological communities shift non-linearly, and the domain of viability increases or decreases compared to a non-coupling scenario. We mathematically demonstrate that whether these changes are positive or negative depends on how the strength of intraspecific interactions shifts relative to interspecific interactions as species' growth rates increase. These new non-linear relationships imply two important shifts of thinking. Theoretically, the definition of structural stability must be generalized and its estimation requires the use of probabilistic measures based on ecological limits. Empirically, if abiotic and biotic barriers operate simultaneously, we need to account for such non-linear processes that can significantly modify population dynamics. Otherwise, we will not make accurate predictions of how ecological communities are assembled and biodiversity is maintained.

Related

  1. Heterogeneity among and competition between life stages together extend the stability boundary of complex ecological communities
    Grace Garmire, James P. O'Dwyer
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textEvolutionary biologyarXiv
  2. Ecological determinants of stability in dryland plant communities
    Johanne Gresse, Jules Segrestin, Lars Götzenberger +5
    The New PhytologistPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPMC
  3. Repeated trends in altitudinal gradients of diversity: How habitat filtering and biotic interactions structure ecological communities
    Raphaël Fougeray, Arlety Roy, Christelle Penager +8
    Journal of Animal EcologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyHAL
  4. Consistent determination of stability regimes in natural ecological communities from abundance time series
    Alberto Megías, Vicente J. Ontiveros, David Alonso +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textEvolutionary biologyBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  5. When does heterogeneity average out in coarse-grained ecological communities?
    M. Luo, V. Savage, C. Song
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{godoy2026coupling,
  title = {{Coupling demography and interactions reshapes the structural stability of ecological communities}},
  author = {O. Godoy and V. Calleja-Solanas and F. Soler-Toscano and J. R. Portillo and J. Garcia-Fuentes and D. Stouffer and J. A. Langa},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.16.759606},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759606v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Coupling demography and interactions reshapes the structural stability of ecological communities
AU  - O. Godoy
AU  - V. Calleja-Solanas
AU  - F. Soler-Toscano
AU  - J. R. Portillo
AU  - J. Garcia-Fuentes
AU  - D. Stouffer
AU  - J. A. Langa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.16.759606
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.16.759606v1
AB  - The assembly of ecological communities depends on both species' demography and the interactions among them. Ecological theory assumes that both ecological processes vary independently. However, empirical evidence demonstrates otherwise. How the structural stability of ecological communities changes when species' intrinsic growth rates and interactions are coupled remains unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we present several seemingly disconnected examples, such as the stress-gradient hypothesis, the covariance between environment and competition, higher-order interactions, and niche packing, that actually fall along a continuum of changes ranging from positive to negative interactions. Although the specific details of each scenario differ, they all share a common feature. When demography and interactions are coupled in multispecies models of population dynamics, the limits of structural stability in ecological communities shift non-linearly, and the domain of viability increases or decreases compared to a non-coupling scenario. We mathematically demonstrate that whether these changes are positive or negative depends on how the strength of intraspecific interactions shifts relative to interspecific interactions as species' growth rates increase. These new non-linear relationships imply two important shifts of thinking. Theoretically, the definition of structural stability must be generalized and its estimation requires the use of probabilistic measures based on ecological limits. Empirically, if abiotic and biotic barriers operate simultaneously, we need to account for such non-linear processes that can significantly modify population dynamics. Otherwise, we will not make accurate predictions of how ecological communities are assembled and biodiversity is maintained.
ER  -