Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in endocrinology

Molecular signaling networks that connect tissue dysfunction to systemic insulin resistance.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Prince Fahad Bin Sultan Chair for Biomedical Research, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
  2. 2Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
  3. 3Department of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
  4. 4Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Insulin resistance is conventionally described as a single condition, but it is better understood as the point at which several tissue-specific signaling failures, each following its own molecular logic and its own timeline, converge into one measurable phenotype. This review treats insulin resistance as a network rather than a collection of independent organ pathologies. Because the components of this network rest on very different kinds of evidence, each node and edge is graded explicitly by study design and causal status, and the time-staged sequence is presented as a falsifiable proposal rather than an established progression. Put simply, insulin resistance is treated here not as one defect but as the shared endpoint of several tissue-specific failures that develop at different times and communicate with one another. Liver, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, pancreatic islets, the gut, and the brain are each examined as nodes with characteristic signaling lesions built from a shared architecture of diacylglycerol- and ceramide-activated kinases, inhibitory serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate proteins, and endoplasmic reticulum stress, while inter-organ messengers, incretins, adipokines, bile acids, and autonomic circuits, are treated as the edges that couple these nodes together. The pancreas is included not as a site of resistance but as the network's compensatory arm, and the brain is treated as an integrated hypothalamic-vagal node rather than a separate neurocognitive topic, closing a loop in which adipose-derived signals impair central insulin and leptin action, weakened central signaling relaxes hepatic glucose control, and reduced satiety sustains the intake that drove adipose dysfunction in the first place. A dedicated section addresses the post-translational and organelle-level machinery, shared serine kinases, ubiquitin-mediated IRS degradation, O-GlcNAcylation, and mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum contact sites, that allows the same small set of molecular tools to produce different tissue-specific outputs. These mechanisms are then placed on an explicit time axis moving from silent compensation, in which adipose and hypothalamic changes precede any measurable defect elsewhere, through early decompensation in liver and muscle, to established decompensation marked by β-cell failure and self-sustaining feed-forward loops, a staging distinction that is largely absent from mechanistic studies conducted at a single, typically late, disease stage. This framing helps explain a pattern in current therapeutics: interventions that act on several network nodes at once, most notably incretin-based therapies, have outperformed mechanistically well-motivated single-node strategies, including direct inhibition of shared convergence kinases. The review closes by identifying where the network remains least understood, principally in longitudinal, tissue-resolved human data capable of testing the proposed staging sequence directly.

Related

  1. Post-Translational Modification Crosstalk in Gastric Cancer: Molecular Switches, Signaling Networks, and Therapeutic Opportunities, with Comparative Insights from Colorectal Cancer
    Jun Wang, Xianying Chen, Yu Wang +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. The Wnt signaling networks in higher-grade meningiomas: from molecular pathogenesis to therapeutic innovation.
    Arathy S Kumar, Olli Tynninen, Miikka Korja
    Cancer cell internationalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. The impact of ventilation mode on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction in a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome
    James G. Williams, Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Nirmeen Elmadany +3
    Intensive care medicine experimentalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Systemic inflammation induces a myocardial inflammatory transcriptional signature without cardiac dysfunction in murine arthritis
    Theis Christian Tønnessen, Muhammad Shakil Ahmed, Diana Domanska +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  5. Adipose tissue dysfunction and the liver: reframing MASH as the hepatic expression of systemic metabolic dysfunction
    Salvatore Corrao, Christiano Argano
    Frontiers in EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{mir2026molecular,
  title = {{Molecular signaling networks that connect tissue dysfunction to systemic insulin resistance.}},
  author = {Rashid Mir and Naseh A Algehainy and Mohammed M Jalal and Malik A Altayar and Reema M Almotairi and Faris J Tayeb and Ruqaiah I Bedaiwi and Faisal H Altemani and Kholoud S Almasoudi and Ibrahim Altedlawi Albalawi and Imadeldin Elfaki},
  journal = {Frontiers in endocrinology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1952238},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903342},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Molecular signaling networks that connect tissue dysfunction to systemic insulin resistance.
AU  - Rashid Mir
AU  - Naseh A Algehainy
AU  - Mohammed M Jalal
AU  - Malik A Altayar
AU  - Reema M Almotairi
AU  - Faris J Tayeb
AU  - Ruqaiah I Bedaiwi
AU  - Faisal H Altemani
AU  - Kholoud S Almasoudi
AU  - Ibrahim Altedlawi Albalawi
AU  - Imadeldin Elfaki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Frontiers in endocrinology
DO  - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1952238
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903342
AB  - Insulin resistance is conventionally described as a single condition, but it is better understood as the point at which several tissue-specific signaling failures, each following its own molecular logic and its own timeline, converge into one measurable phenotype. This review treats insulin resistance as a network rather than a collection of independent organ pathologies. Because the components of this network rest on very different kinds of evidence, each node and edge is graded explicitly by study design and causal status, and the time-staged sequence is presented as a falsifiable proposal rather than an established progression. Put simply, insulin resistance is treated here not as one defect but as the shared endpoint of several tissue-specific failures that develop at different times and communicate with one another. Liver, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, pancreatic islets, the gut, and the brain are each examined as nodes with characteristic signaling lesions built from a shared architecture of diacylglycerol- and ceramide-activated kinases, inhibitory serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate proteins, and endoplasmic reticulum stress, while inter-organ messengers, incretins, adipokines, bile acids, and autonomic circuits, are treated as the edges that couple these nodes together. The pancreas is included not as a site of resistance but as the network's compensatory arm, and the brain is treated as an integrated hypothalamic-vagal node rather than a separate neurocognitive topic, closing a loop in which adipose-derived signals impair central insulin and leptin action, weakened central signaling relaxes hepatic glucose control, and reduced satiety sustains the intake that drove adipose dysfunction in the first place. A dedicated section addresses the post-translational and organelle-level machinery, shared serine kinases, ubiquitin-mediated IRS degradation, O-GlcNAcylation, and mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum contact sites, that allows the same small set of molecular tools to produce different tissue-specific outputs. These mechanisms are then placed on an explicit time axis moving from silent compensation, in which adipose and hypothalamic changes precede any measurable defect elsewhere, through early decompensation in liver and muscle, to established decompensation marked by β-cell failure and self-sustaining feed-forward loops, a staging distinction that is largely absent from mechanistic studies conducted at a single, typically late, disease stage. This framing helps explain a pattern in current therapeutics: interventions that act on several network nodes at once, most notably incretin-based therapies, have outperformed mechanistically well-motivated single-node strategies, including direct inhibition of shared convergence kinases. The review closes by identifying where the network remains least understood, principally in longitudinal, tissue-resolved human data capable of testing the proposed staging sequence directly.
SN  - 1664-2392
ER  -