Toward Greener Solvent Systems for the Electrospinning of Cellulose and Its Derivatives
- 1Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
- 2Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Electrospinning cellulose and its derivatives commonly relies on hazardous solvents, motivating the development of less hazardous alternatives. This narrative review examines conventional and alternative solvent systems, relating polymer solubility, processing conditions, and reported fiber morphology to solvent hazards and practical limitations. Representative studies were identified through targeted searches and reference tracking. For cellulose derivatives, aqueous mixtures of acetone, acetic acid, or ethanol and dimethyl carbonate-based formulations provide alternatives to systems containing hazardous amides or chlorinated solvents. For native cellulose, the reviewed routes include N-methylmorpholine N-oxide, aqueous alkali, ionic liquids, and a switchable solvent system based on 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, carbon dioxide, and dimethyl sulfoxide. Reported mean diameters span 160–1280 nm for cellulose acetate in acetic acid/water and 250–750 nm for cellulose in N-methylmorpholine N-oxide/water. These ranges overlap those obtained with conventional systems, but differences in polymer grade and spinning conditions prevent direct performance comparisons. Lower solvent hazard does not establish lower overall environmental impact: heating, coagulation, washing, carrier polymers, and solvent recovery can introduce additional burdens. The available evidence supports several candidate substitutions, while matched-condition comparisons and quantitative measurements of energy use, recovery yield, waste generation, and productivity are needed to establish their suitability for wider application.
Related
- One-Pot Synthesis and Electrospinning of Cellulose Derivatives Bearing Pseudo-Peptide Pendants via Ugi Four−Component Reaction for Functional Nanofiber Fabrication
- Understanding the Structure and Assembly of Dense, Solvent-Free Cellulose Derivatives through Atomistic Force-Field Comparisons
- Towards Sustainable Regenerated Cellulose Fibres: A Review of Conventional Spinning Technologies and Advancing Ionic Liquid-DMSO Solvent Systems.
- Cellulose Ester Films Preparation in a DBU–CO2 Switchable Solvent: From Batch Synthesis to Reactive Extrusion at High-Solid Content
- 3D DLP Printing of Multi-Responsive Cellulose Derivatives with Tunable Structural Color
BibTeX
@article{lee2026toward,
title = {{Toward Greener Solvent Systems for the Electrospinning of Cellulose and Its Derivatives}},
author = {Hoik Lee},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3390/polym18212765},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2765},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Toward Greener Solvent Systems for the Electrospinning of Cellulose and Its Derivatives
AU - Hoik Lee
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18212765
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2765
AB - Electrospinning cellulose and its derivatives commonly relies on hazardous solvents, motivating the development of less hazardous alternatives. This narrative review examines conventional and alternative solvent systems, relating polymer solubility, processing conditions, and reported fiber morphology to solvent hazards and practical limitations. Representative studies were identified through targeted searches and reference tracking. For cellulose derivatives, aqueous mixtures of acetone, acetic acid, or ethanol and dimethyl carbonate-based formulations provide alternatives to systems containing hazardous amides or chlorinated solvents. For native cellulose, the reviewed routes include N-methylmorpholine N-oxide, aqueous alkali, ionic liquids, and a switchable solvent system based on 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, carbon dioxide, and dimethyl sulfoxide. Reported mean diameters span 160–1280 nm for cellulose acetate in acetic acid/water and 250–750 nm for cellulose in N-methylmorpholine N-oxide/water. These ranges overlap those obtained with conventional systems, but differences in polymer grade and spinning conditions prevent direct performance comparisons. Lower solvent hazard does not establish lower overall environmental impact: heating, coagulation, washing, carrier polymers, and solvent recovery can introduce additional burdens. The available evidence supports several candidate substitutions, while matched-condition comparisons and quantitative measurements of energy use, recovery yield, waste generation, and productivity are needed to establish their suitability for wider application.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -