Long-term abortion and birth rates for 14- to 25-year-olds before and after the implementation of prescription-free emergency contraceptives in Finland
Abstract
Background: Public health interventions increasing access to emergency contraceptives (ECs) have been deemed mostly unsuccessful in preventing abortions. However, the assessment of these interventions has mostly ignored potential variation in responses by age at intervention or socio-economic background.
Methods: We used Finnish-population register data to assess annual abortion and live-birth rates for women aged 14–25 years during 1994–2010 by age and parental education. Changes in rates were assessed around the introduction of prescription-free ECs in 2002 with interrupted time-series regressions. We also assessed cohort-wise hazards of abortions and births by age 25 years for cohorts of 1980–94 (aged 8-22 years at the time of intervention).
Results: After the introduction of prescription-free ECs, the increasing annual rates of abortions and live births turned into a clear decline for ages 15–19 years, with a less consistent decline for young people whose parents had low educational attainment. Conversely, the abortion rates continued to increase for ages 20–24 years, with larger increases by lower parental education. Comparing cohorts exposed to the intervention at different ages, we observed lower abortion and live-birth risks by age 19 years among the cohorts who were ≤15 years old at the time of the intervention.
Conclusion: The clear reversal in adolescent abortion rates suggests the prescription-free ECs worked as intended, but the intervention was far less successful among young adults and those with lower socio-economic background. Evaluations of public health interventions need to consider population subgroups.
Related
- Women's experiences of emergency post-abortion care at Kawempe National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a qualitative descriptive study
- Women’s experiences of emergency post-abortion care at Kawempe National Referral Hospital, Uganda: A qualitative descriptive study
- Prescription drugs and the risk of road traffic crashes in Bordeaux, France: a study matching emergency department health reports and a pharmaceutical reimbursement registry
- Closing the education gap in DoxyPEP implementation and STI-related non-prescription antibiotic use
- Effectiveness of Discrete Strategies and Implementation Bundles for Improving Clinician Prescription of Clinical Practice Guideline–Recommended Medications for Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
BibTeX
@article{luukkonen2026longterm,
title = {{Long-term abortion and birth rates for 14- to 25-year-olds before and after the implementation of prescription-free emergency contraceptives in Finland}},
author = {Juha Luukkonen and Olivia McEvoy and Pekka Martikainen and Sini P Laakso and Hanna Remes},
journal = {International Journal of Epidemiology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/ije/dyag232},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyag232},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Long-term abortion and birth rates for 14- to 25-year-olds before and after the implementation of prescription-free emergency contraceptives in Finland
AU - Juha Luukkonen
AU - Olivia McEvoy
AU - Pekka Martikainen
AU - Sini P Laakso
AU - Hanna Remes
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
JO - International Journal of Epidemiology
DO - 10.1093/ije/dyag232
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyag232
AB - Background: Public health interventions increasing access to emergency contraceptives (ECs) have been deemed mostly unsuccessful in preventing abortions. However, the assessment of these interventions has mostly ignored potential variation in responses by age at intervention or socio-economic background. Methods: We used Finnish-population register data to assess annual abortion and live-birth rates for women aged 14–25 years during 1994–2010 by age and parental education. Changes in rates were assessed around the introduction of prescription-free ECs in 2002 with interrupted time-series regressions. We also assessed cohort-wise hazards of abortions and births by age 25 years for cohorts of 1980–94 (aged 8-22 years at the time of intervention). Results: After the introduction of prescription-free ECs, the increasing annual rates of abortions and live births turned into a clear decline for ages 15–19 years, with a less consistent decline for young people whose parents had low educational attainment. Conversely, the abortion rates continued to increase for ages 20–24 years, with larger increases by lower parental education. Comparing cohorts exposed to the intervention at different ages, we observed lower abortion and live-birth risks by age 19 years among the cohorts who were ≤15 years old at the time of the intervention. Conclusion: The clear reversal in adolescent abortion rates suggests the prescription-free ECs worked as intended, but the intervention was far less successful among young adults and those with lower socio-economic background. Evaluations of public health interventions need to consider population subgroups.
SN - 0300-5771
SN - 1464-3685
ER -