Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Quantum Advantage for Two-Party Differential Privacy

Abstract

We introduce information-theoretically private quantum protocols for two-party Hamming distance when both parties must output the same estimate. Classically, for input length n, information-theoretic protocols require Ω(√n) error under pure differential privacy and Ω(√n/log n) error under strong approximate differential privacy, whereas computational security permits O(1) error. In Klauck's honest, nonpreemptive, message-preserving model, we give an O(n)-communication quantum protocol with pure ε quantum differential privacy (QDP) and expected error at most 2/(sinh ε)+γ, for every γ>0. For approximate (ε, δ) QDP, an exact hockey-stick divergence calculation yields strictly smaller error, while preserving the O(1)-versus-Ω(√n/log n) separation for δ=o(1/n). Thus, quantum communication achieves O(1) information-theoretic error, matching the accuracy available classically only under computational assumptions. The main construction uses a guarded coherent round trip and an equal-Gram rigidity principle that prevents an honest player from retaining input-dependent complementary information. We separate this model from weaker prescribed-channel privacy, which already admits an exact classical realization, and from fully retention-robust security, against which measurement-and-abort attacks remain possible. Therefore, we identify preservation of non-orthogonal quantum messages as a resource for privacy.

Related

  1. High quantum local differential privacy breaks entanglement
    Sujeet Bhalerao, Theshani Nuradha, Felix Leditzky
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Prophet Inequalities under Local Differential Privacy
    Achraf Azize, Mathieu Molina, Hugo Richard +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Performative Privacy: When Differential Privacy Maximizes Utility
    Uddalak Mukherjee, Edwige Cyffers, Yann Chevaleyre
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Task-aware Kernel Stein certificates for Rényi differential privacy
    Leoni Carla Wirth, Tara Trauthwein, Gesine Reinert
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Minimax Wasserstein Testing under Differential Privacy
    Bonwoo Lee, Ilmun Kim, Cheolwoo Park
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{alabi2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum Advantage for Two-Party Differential Privacy}},
  author = {Daniel Alabi and Emil T. Khabiboulline},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02113},
  eprint = {2610.02113},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02113},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum Advantage for Two-Party Differential Privacy
AU  - Daniel Alabi
AU  - Emil T. Khabiboulline
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02113
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02113
AB  - We introduce information-theoretically private quantum protocols for two-party Hamming distance when both parties must output the same estimate. Classically, for input length n, information-theoretic protocols require Ω(√n) error under pure differential privacy and Ω(√n/log n) error under strong approximate differential privacy, whereas computational security permits O(1) error. In Klauck's honest, nonpreemptive, message-preserving model, we give an O(n)-communication quantum protocol with pure ε quantum differential privacy (QDP) and expected error at most 2/(sinh ε)+γ, for every γ>0. For approximate (ε, δ) QDP, an exact hockey-stick divergence calculation yields strictly smaller error, while preserving the O(1)-versus-Ω(√n/log n) separation for δ=o(1/n). Thus, quantum communication achieves O(1) information-theoretic error, matching the accuracy available classically only under computational assumptions. The main construction uses a guarded coherent round trip and an equal-Gram rigidity principle that prevents an honest player from retaining input-dependent complementary information. We separate this model from weaker prescribed-channel privacy, which already admits an exact classical realization, and from fully retention-robust security, against which measurement-and-abort attacks remain possible. Therefore, we identify preservation of non-orthogonal quantum messages as a resource for privacy.
ER  -