Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-response study of MR-107A-02 in the treatment of post-surgical dental pain

Abstract

Background: MR-107A-02 is a novel, oral meloxicam formulation designed to enhance dissolution and absorption for rapid analgesia in acute pain. It demonstrates a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, with a higher Cmax and shorter Tmax than Mobic® (meloxicam tablets), while maintaining similar overall extent of exposure.

Methods: This phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study assessed the efficacy and safety of MR-107A-02 at doses of 1.25, 5, and 15 mg twice daily (BID) following third molar extraction. The primary endpoint was SPID0–24, analyzed in the mITT population using W6LOCF to account for rescue medication use. Pain intensity and categorical ratings were evaluated using standardized pain scales. Onset of perceptible and meaningful pain relief were measured using the double-stopwatch technique. Effect sizes and associated standard errors, p-values, and 95% CIs were estimated using an Emax model.

Results: Among 110 participants, MR-107A-02 demonstrated positive dose-dependent analgesia, with mean SPID0-24 Emax values of 70.7 (1.25 mg), 86.7 (5 mg), and 94.8 (15 mg), versus 52.0 for placebo. Significant improvement in SPID0-24 occurred at 5 mg and 15 mg versus placebo (p < .001). The 15 mg dose achieved perceptible and meaningful pain relief within 0.6 and 1.5 hours, respectively, and had the lowest rescue medication use (29.6%) compared to 42.9%, 57.1%, and 74.1% in the 1.25 mg, 5 mg, and placebo. No severe TEAEs, SAEs, or discontinuations were reported.

Conclusions: MR-107A-02 was generally well tolerated and demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy, with the 15 mg BID dose providing rapid analgesia and a reduction in rescue medication use.

Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT05317312 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05317312

Related

  1. A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Treatment for First Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Justin Le, Nazanin Kermanshahi, Jason Tran +4
    Hand (New York, N.Y.)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. The protocol for a phase 2A, multi centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to assess the effect of 12 weeks treatment with oral PXS-4728A on microglia activation, as measured by positron emission tomography, in participants with isolated rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder
    Karolien Groenewald, Johannes C. Klein, Tim D. Fryer +10
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurologyCrossref
  3. Copenhagen Magnetic Personalized Accelerated Brain Circuit Therapy (CoMPACT) trial: study protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed, parallel-group trial of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
    Armita Faghani Jadidi, Iman Ibrahim, Lasse Christiansen +10
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  4. The effect of a low-iodine diet on remission and quality of life in newly diagnosed patients with Graves’ disease: the ELODI superiority, parallel group randomized controlled trial protocol
    Elsbeth R. P. C. van Wees-Jansen, Barbara A. Hutten, Max Nieuwdorp
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  5. PlanetDiet: Sustainable diets and cardiometabolic health, study protocol for a six-month parallel-group randomized controlled trial in middle-aged adults at cardiovascular risk
    M. Trius-Soler, T. da Costa-Seco, A. Rewers +4
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNutritionmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{bertoch2026randomized,
  title = {{A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-response study of MR-107A-02 in the treatment of post-surgical dental pain}},
  author = {Todd Mitchell Bertoch and Seth Grisham and Susanne Vogt and Scott Haughie and Kathleen Ocasio and Jeffrey P Smith},
  journal = {Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1093/pm/pnag095},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnag095},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, dose-response study of MR-107A-02 in the treatment of post-surgical dental pain
AU  - Todd Mitchell Bertoch
AU  - Seth Grisham
AU  - Susanne Vogt
AU  - Scott Haughie
AU  - Kathleen Ocasio
AU  - Jeffrey P Smith
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/26
JO  - Pain Medicine: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Pain Medicine
DO  - 10.1093/pm/pnag095
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnag095
AB  - Background: MR-107A-02 is a novel, oral meloxicam formulation designed to enhance dissolution and absorption for rapid analgesia in acute pain. It demonstrates a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, with a higher Cmax and shorter Tmax than Mobic® (meloxicam tablets), while maintaining similar overall extent of exposure.  Methods: This phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study assessed the efficacy and safety of MR-107A-02 at doses of 1.25, 5, and 15 mg twice daily (BID) following third molar extraction. The primary endpoint was SPID0–24, analyzed in the mITT population using W6LOCF to account for rescue medication use. Pain intensity and categorical ratings were evaluated using standardized pain scales. Onset of perceptible and meaningful pain relief were measured using the double-stopwatch technique. Effect sizes and associated standard errors, p-values, and 95% CIs were estimated using an Emax model.  Results: Among 110 participants, MR-107A-02 demonstrated positive dose-dependent analgesia, with mean SPID0-24 Emax values of 70.7 (1.25 mg), 86.7 (5 mg), and 94.8 (15 mg), versus 52.0 for placebo. Significant improvement in SPID0-24 occurred at 5 mg and 15 mg versus placebo (p < .001). The 15 mg dose achieved perceptible and meaningful pain relief within 0.6 and 1.5 hours, respectively, and had the lowest rescue medication use (29.6%) compared to 42.9%, 57.1%, and 74.1% in the 1.25 mg, 5 mg, and placebo. No severe TEAEs, SAEs, or discontinuations were reported.  Conclusions: MR-107A-02 was generally well tolerated and demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy, with the 15 mg BID dose providing rapid analgesia and a reduction in rescue medication use.  Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT05317312 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05317312
SN  - 1526-2375
SN  - 1526-4637
ER  -