Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDEJNMMI research

Toward harmonized PROMISE PSMA scoring: a simple approach for correcting ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake based on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL reference values.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinsky Street, Petah Tikva, Israel.
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
  3. 3Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  4. 4University Medical Imaging Toronto; Joint Department of Medical Imaging: University Health Network, Sinai Health Systems, Women's College Hospital & Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  5. 5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, 39 Jabotinsky Street, Petah Tikva, Israel. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

The PROMISE framework standardizes PSMA PET interpretation using reference organs, particularly the liver. For hepatobiliary-excreted tracers (e.g., ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007), the spleen was proposed as an alternative reference, though without quantitative validation. We evaluated PSMA-ligand uptake patterns among ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL to assess the validity of spleen-based referencing and develop a simple approach that may harmonize ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake with that of renally-excreted tracers.Results

331 consecutive PSMA PET-CT studies (n = 118/95/118 for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11/¹⁸F-PSMA-1007/¹⁸F-DCFPyL) were analyzed: SUVs were retrospectively measured in all studies in reference tissues (blood pool, liver, parotid), with SUVspleen also recorded for ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007. SUVliver differed markedly across tracers: ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 (13.95 ± 4.71) > ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 (7.45 ± 4.59) ≈ ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (8.11 ± 1.78), p < 0.01. The elevated ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake expanded the PROMISE score-1 range (SUV range between SUVblood pool and SUVliver) and compressed that of score-2 (SUV range between SUVliver and SUVparotid). SUVspleen in this group (12.24 ± 5.67) showed only moderate correlation with SUVliver (r = 0.43) and exceeded SUVliver in 29% of cases, questioning the utility of spleen uptake as a consistent alternative to liver uptake-based cutoff. Linear correction using the inverse ratio of mean SUVliver (¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 versus other tracers; factor = 0.56, 95% CI 0.51-0.61) yielded SUVliver-corrected of 7.8 ± 2.63 in the ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 group. Applying SUVspleen as a PSMA score 1-2 cutoff failed to resolve score distribution imbalance, upstaging only 11.8% of score-1 lesions to score-2. By contrast, the use of SUVliver-corrected (SUVliver × 0.56) as this cutoff harmonized the score distribution in the ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 cohort relative to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL, leading to reclassification of 38.2% of score-1 lesions as score-2.Conclusion

In PET with ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007, PROMISE scoring based on unadjusted liver or spleen uptake systematically underestimates lesion scores. The simple linear correction approach proposed here offers a research avenue for enhancing the consistency of PSMA scoring for improved interpretive standardization. This study contains data obtained from a prospective Registry Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03718260, registered October 24, 2018.

Related

  1. Scoring respondents on a semantic frame of reference identifies a group that is burdened across many questionnaires and reaches care less easily
    M. Aggarwal, V. Periwal
    medRxivPreprintCC0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  2. Development of a Simple Scoring System to Distinguish Epstein-Barr virus-related Infectious Mononucleosis (EBV-IM) from Non-EBV IM Using Routine Laboratory Parameters
    Erina Noguchi, Takashi Ogasawara, Yuki Hiraoka +3
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyJ-STAGE
  3. A simple needle disc puncture in the cervical spine is a safe and efficient alternative to disc/vertebral biopsy: ten years’ experience in a reference centre
    Clément Heurtault, François Robin, Simon Cadiou +3
    World NeurosurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaHAL
  4. Comparative predictive modeling of pediatric spirometry reference equations in Jordanian children: Complex versus simple models
    Walid Al-Qerem, Anan Jarab, Judith Eberhardt +3
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. Digital participation and socioeconomic inequalities in later-life health: a cross-national analysis of six harmonized aging cohorts
    Linwei Liu, Qiu Zhang
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{anconina2026toward,
  title = {{Toward harmonized PROMISE PSMA scoring: a simple approach for correcting ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake based on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL reference values.}},
  author = {Reut Anconina and Miriam Priss and Esther Landau and Moshe Sason and Arnon Schwartz and Eli Atar and Chen Abitbol and Ur Metser and Hanna Bernstine and Dan Cohen},
  journal = {EJNMMI research},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s13550-026-01499-5},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902110},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Toward harmonized PROMISE PSMA scoring: a simple approach for correcting ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake based on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL reference values.
AU  - Reut Anconina
AU  - Miriam Priss
AU  - Esther Landau
AU  - Moshe Sason
AU  - Arnon Schwartz
AU  - Eli Atar
AU  - Chen Abitbol
AU  - Ur Metser
AU  - Hanna Bernstine
AU  - Dan Cohen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - EJNMMI research
DO  - 10.1186/s13550-026-01499-5
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902110
AB  - Background  The PROMISE framework standardizes PSMA PET interpretation using reference organs, particularly the liver. For hepatobiliary-excreted tracers (e.g., ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007), the spleen was proposed as an alternative reference, though without quantitative validation. We evaluated PSMA-ligand uptake patterns among ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL to assess the validity of spleen-based referencing and develop a simple approach that may harmonize ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake with that of renally-excreted tracers.Results  331 consecutive PSMA PET-CT studies (n = 118/95/118 for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11/¹⁸F-PSMA-1007/¹⁸F-DCFPyL) were analyzed: SUVs were retrospectively measured in all studies in reference tissues (blood pool, liver, parotid), with SUVspleen also recorded for ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007. SUVliver differed markedly across tracers: ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 (13.95 ± 4.71) > ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 (7.45 ± 4.59) ≈ ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (8.11 ± 1.78), p < 0.01. The elevated ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 liver uptake expanded the PROMISE score-1 range (SUV range between SUVblood pool and SUVliver) and compressed that of score-2 (SUV range between SUVliver and SUVparotid). SUVspleen in this group (12.24 ± 5.67) showed only moderate correlation with SUVliver (r = 0.43) and exceeded SUVliver in 29% of cases, questioning the utility of spleen uptake as a consistent alternative to liver uptake-based cutoff. Linear correction using the inverse ratio of mean SUVliver (¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 versus other tracers; factor = 0.56, 95% CI 0.51-0.61) yielded SUVliver-corrected of 7.8 ± 2.63 in the ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 group. Applying SUVspleen as a PSMA score 1-2 cutoff failed to resolve score distribution imbalance, upstaging only 11.8% of score-1 lesions to score-2. By contrast, the use of SUVliver-corrected (SUVliver × 0.56) as this cutoff harmonized the score distribution in the ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 cohort relative to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL, leading to reclassification of 38.2% of score-1 lesions as score-2.Conclusion  In PET with ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007, PROMISE scoring based on unadjusted liver or spleen uptake systematically underestimates lesion scores. The simple linear correction approach proposed here offers a research avenue for enhancing the consistency of PSMA scoring for improved interpretive standardization. This study contains data obtained from a prospective Registry Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03718260, registered October 24, 2018.
SN  - 2191-219X
ER  -