Clinical research is not an optional extra
- 1Royal College of Physicians of London, United Kingdom; The Pandemic Institute, and NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, United Kingdom; University of Liverpool and Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Corresponding author at: Royal College of Physicians of London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Clinical research underpins almost everything we do in the NHS, from diagnostics and therapeutics to service design and workforce development, while also driving economic growth through the life sciences sector. Yet the UK clinical research workforce is in decline, at a time of rising patient need. Financial pressures on universities, increasing clinical demand, fragile funding routes and inflexible training pathways, are making academic careers harder to enter and sustain. Valuable research delivered by resident doctors, consultants, SAS and locally employed doctors is also unrecognised and unsupported. Research should not be seen as an optional extra. It is mandated in policy, embedded in professional standards, and essential to improving outcomes. A whole workforce approach is needed. At the Royal College of Physicians, we are supporting doctors making the case for research in job planning and training, strengthening recognition and funding opportunities for early clinical research, and addressing structural barriers to academic careers through national policy engagement.
Related
- OP–225 Beyond extra digits: clinical characteristics and surgical management of polydactyly
- SCOPE (Scapular Corrections for Posterior Escape) for posterior glenohumeral instability: technique of posterior acromial corrective osteotomy with optional glenoid corrective osteotomy
- cPRArgentina: a population-specific cPRA calculator incorporating optional ABO compatibility
- CO013 | INDICATIONS AND OUTCOMES OF OPTIONAL INFERIOR CAVA FILTERS IN CANCER-ASSOCIATED THROMBOSIS AND IN NON CANCER PATENTS WITH VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM
- From basic research to clinical diagnosis
BibTeX
@article{solomon2026clinical,
title = {{Clinical research is not an optional extra}},
author = {Tom Solomon},
journal = {Clinical Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.clinme.2026.100631},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2026.100631},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Clinical research is not an optional extra
AU - Tom Solomon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/01
JO - Clinical Medicine
DO - 10.1016/j.clinme.2026.100631
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2026.100631
AB - Clinical research underpins almost everything we do in the NHS, from diagnostics and therapeutics to service design and workforce development, while also driving economic growth through the life sciences sector. Yet the UK clinical research workforce is in decline, at a time of rising patient need. Financial pressures on universities, increasing clinical demand, fragile funding routes and inflexible training pathways, are making academic careers harder to enter and sustain. Valuable research delivered by resident doctors, consultants, SAS and locally employed doctors is also unrecognised and unsupported. Research should not be seen as an optional extra. It is mandated in policy, embedded in professional standards, and essential to improving outcomes. A whole workforce approach is needed. At the Royal College of Physicians, we are supporting doctors making the case for research in job planning and training, strengthening recognition and funding opportunities for early clinical research, and addressing structural barriers to academic careers through national policy engagement.
SN - 1470-2118
SN - 1473-4893
ER -