Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quiescent Galaxies at z > 2 from CAPERS spectroscopy and their Number densities

19 more authors

Abstract

Recent JWST observations have revealed an overabundance of quiescent galaxies at high redshift. Photometric methods, such as photometry-derived sSFRs, UVJ colors, and synthetic ugis colors, are commonly used to identify quiescent galaxies, but their completeness and purity remain poorly constrained. Here we present a spectroscopically selected sample of 19 quiescent galaxies at 2 ≤ z ≤ 4 from the CANDELS-Area Prism Epoch of Reionization Survey (CAPERS). They are selected with M∗ > 109.5 M⊙ and a specific star formation rate below 20% of the inverse cosmic age. These galaxies formed 50% of their stellar mass at z ∼ 3.0--4.6 and quenched rapidly on timescales of ∼0.1--0.2 Gyr. These quenching timescales are comparable to those of other high-redshift QGs but shorter than those at lower redshift. Using the spectroscopic sample as a benchmark, we assess commonly adopted photometric QG selection methods. We find completeness of 63--89% and purities of only 40--63%, with strong emission-line galaxies constituting the dominant source of contamination. Applying completeness and purity corrections calibrated from the spectroscopic sample, we measure the number density of quiescent galaxies at 2 ≤ z ≤ 5. The resulting number densities exceed the predictions of most current galaxy-formation simulations at 2<z<4, with the largest discrepancy at M∗ ≥ 1010.5 M⊙. This discrepancy suggests that current cosmological models may not assemble and quench massive galaxies sufficiently early or efficiently.

Related

  1. PANORAMIC: The Dawn of Massive Quiescent Galaxies. I. Number Density and Cosmic Variance from 1000 arcmin ² NIRCam Imaging
    Zhiyuan Ji, Christina C. Williams, Peter Behroozi +13
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesCrossref
  2. Caught Napping by JWST UNCOVER+MegaScience: Constraining bursty star formation histories and number densities of mini-quenched galaxies at redshifts 4-7
    Gourav Khullar, Rachel Bezanson, Katherine A. Suess +27
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  3. Evolution of the morphology-density and morphology-mass relations of quiescent galaxies at 0.5 {2}lt;z<$ 2.5 in the COSMOS-Web survey
    Guanwen Fang, Yuguo Su, Shiying Lu +2
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsGalaxiesCrossref
  4. The Role of Environment in Shaping the Assembly Timelines of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at Cosmic Noon
    Tianmu Gao, J. Trevor Mendel, Letizia Bugiani +10
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  5. The Stellar Populations of Two Quiescent Low Surface Brightness Dwarf Galaxies in Low Density Environments
    Duncan A. Forbes, Hannah S. Christie, Arsen Levitskiy +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{shen2026quiescent,
  title = {{Quiescent Galaxies at $z > 2$ from CAPERS spectroscopy and their Number densities}},
  author = {Lu Shen and Weida Hu and Casey Papovich and Justin Cole and Mark Dickinson and Pablo Arrabal Haro and Anthony J. Taylor and Adam C. Carnall and Ángel Chandro-Gómez and Yingjie Cheng and Nikko J. Cleri and James S. Dunlop and Carter Flayhart and Steven L. Finkelstein and Mauro Giavalisco and Michaela Hirschmann and Eric F. Jiménez-Andrade and Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe and Claudia D. P. Lagos and Ho-Hin Leung and Arianna S. Long and Ray A. Lucas and Eric J. Murphy and Lorenzo Napolitano and Pablo G. Pérez-González and Raymond C. Simons and Struan D Stevenson and Elizabeth Taylor and Xin Wang and L. Y. Aaron Yung and Jorge A. Zavala},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20931},
  eprint = {2609.20931},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20931},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quiescent Galaxies at z > 2 from CAPERS spectroscopy and their Number densities
AU  - Lu Shen
AU  - Weida Hu
AU  - Casey Papovich
AU  - Justin Cole
AU  - Mark Dickinson
AU  - Pablo Arrabal Haro
AU  - Anthony J. Taylor
AU  - Adam C. Carnall
AU  - Ángel Chandro-Gómez
AU  - Yingjie Cheng
AU  - Nikko J. Cleri
AU  - James S. Dunlop
AU  - Carter Flayhart
AU  - Steven L. Finkelstein
AU  - Mauro Giavalisco
AU  - Michaela Hirschmann
AU  - Eric F. Jiménez-Andrade
AU  - Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe
AU  - Claudia D. P. Lagos
AU  - Ho-Hin Leung
AU  - Arianna S. Long
AU  - Ray A. Lucas
AU  - Eric J. Murphy
AU  - Lorenzo Napolitano
AU  - Pablo G. Pérez-González
AU  - Raymond C. Simons
AU  - Struan D Stevenson
AU  - Elizabeth Taylor
AU  - Xin Wang
AU  - L. Y. Aaron Yung
AU  - Jorge A. Zavala
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20931
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20931
AB  - Recent JWST observations have revealed an overabundance of quiescent galaxies at high redshift. Photometric methods, such as photometry-derived sSFRs, UVJ colors, and synthetic ugi_s colors, are commonly used to identify quiescent galaxies, but their completeness and purity remain poorly constrained. Here we present a spectroscopically selected sample of 19 quiescent galaxies at 2 ≤ z ≤ 4 from the CANDELS-Area Prism Epoch of Reionization Survey (CAPERS). They are selected with M_∗ > 10^9.5 M_⊙ and a specific star formation rate below 20% of the inverse cosmic age. These galaxies formed 50% of their stellar mass at z ∼ 3.0--4.6 and quenched rapidly on timescales of ∼0.1--0.2 Gyr. These quenching timescales are comparable to those of other high-redshift QGs but shorter than those at lower redshift. Using the spectroscopic sample as a benchmark, we assess commonly adopted photometric QG selection methods. We find completeness of 63--89% and purities of only 40--63%, with strong emission-line galaxies constituting the dominant source of contamination. Applying completeness and purity corrections calibrated from the spectroscopic sample, we measure the number density of quiescent galaxies at 2 ≤ z ≤ 5. The resulting number densities exceed the predictions of most current galaxy-formation simulations at 2<z<4, with the largest discrepancy at M_∗ ≥ 10^10.5 M_⊙. This discrepancy suggests that current cosmological models may not assemble and quench massive galaxies sufficiently early or efficiently.
ER  -