Foraging benefits of winning intergroup encounters in colobus monkeys
- 1Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, MH 4.03.38, UTSA, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
- 2Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
- 3Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC Canada
Abstract
Winners of aggressive intergroup encounters are often assumed to benefit from increased access to resources, but few studies have measured whether there is differential access to resources based on the intergroup outcome. To investigate whether winning intergroup encounters is associated with increased access to food, we used 13 months of data on intergroup dynamics, feeding by 61 females, and the phenology and spatial distributions of food trees from the home ranges of 8 groups of white-thighed black-and-white colobus (Colobus vellerosus) at Boabeng-Fiema, Ghana. Contested trees were important food species more often than expected based on the occurrence of these species in the study area. Contested trees had young leaves, fruits, and seeds more often than expected based on the presence of these plant parts on trees monitored via monthly phenology surveys. Focal females were more likely to feed on the contested tree than other trees they were in during and immediately after the intergroup encounter. Based on group scan data collected throughout the day of an intergroup encounter, the likelihood of females feeding on any food species before and during the intergroup encounter was similar regardless of the outcome. The likelihood of feeding was higher after the intergroup encounter if the group had won compared to if the group had lost. These findings indicate that groups compete over access to important food resources and winners benefit from increased access to food. Future studies should investigate whether winning intergroup encounters is associated with long-term benefits such as increased reproductive success.
Related
- Offensive unpredictability and defensive tracking in intergroup conflict show sex-differentiated patterns
- How early microbial encounters shape adult behavior
- Effects of heat stress on the foraging activity of incipient ant colonies
- Changes in foraging gene expression of female Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) are associated with physiological states and locomotor activity
- Back to the roots: Fine-scale insights into adaptive foraging by a high-Arctic large herbivore.
BibTeX
@article{wikberg2026foraging,
title = {{Foraging benefits of winning intergroup encounters in colobus monkeys}},
author = {Eva C. Wikberg and Sara Lucci and Emily Glotfelty and Fernando Campos and Pascale Sicotte},
journal = {Primates; Journal of Primatology},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1007/s10329-026-01272-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-026-01272-1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Foraging benefits of winning intergroup encounters in colobus monkeys
AU - Eva C. Wikberg
AU - Sara Lucci
AU - Emily Glotfelty
AU - Fernando Campos
AU - Pascale Sicotte
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/18
JO - Primates; Journal of Primatology
DO - 10.1007/s10329-026-01272-1
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-026-01272-1
AB - Winners of aggressive intergroup encounters are often assumed to benefit from increased access to resources, but few studies have measured whether there is differential access to resources based on the intergroup outcome. To investigate whether winning intergroup encounters is associated with increased access to food, we used 13 months of data on intergroup dynamics, feeding by 61 females, and the phenology and spatial distributions of food trees from the home ranges of 8 groups of white-thighed black-and-white colobus (Colobus vellerosus) at Boabeng-Fiema, Ghana. Contested trees were important food species more often than expected based on the occurrence of these species in the study area. Contested trees had young leaves, fruits, and seeds more often than expected based on the presence of these plant parts on trees monitored via monthly phenology surveys. Focal females were more likely to feed on the contested tree than other trees they were in during and immediately after the intergroup encounter. Based on group scan data collected throughout the day of an intergroup encounter, the likelihood of females feeding on any food species before and during the intergroup encounter was similar regardless of the outcome. The likelihood of feeding was higher after the intergroup encounter if the group had won compared to if the group had lost. These findings indicate that groups compete over access to important food resources and winners benefit from increased access to food. Future studies should investigate whether winning intergroup encounters is associated with long-term benefits such as increased reproductive success.
SN - 0032-8332
SN - 1610-7365
ER -