Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYSmart Agricultural Technology

Remote sensing and artificial intelligence for crop pest and disease monitoring: A systematic review of sensing technologies, AI approaches, and barriers to field adoption

6 affiliations
  1. 1Doctoral Programme in Environmental Engineering and Science, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, 15024, Peru
  2. 2Water Research and Technology Center (CITA), Universidad de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Lima, 15063, Peru
  3. 3Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo, Lambayeque, 14013, Peru
  4. 4Remote Sensing Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 15081, Lima, Peru
  5. 5Geo-Environmental Cartography and Remote Sensing Group (CGAT), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
  6. 6Department of Water Resources, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, 15024, Peru

Abstract

Pest and disease outbreaks remain a major constraint on agricultural productivity, making reliable crop monitoring a priority for precision agriculture. In this context, remote sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as complementary tools for improving the detection and monitoring of phytosanitary problems across spatial scales. This systematic review synthesizes recent advances in the integration of remote sensing and AI for crop pest and disease monitoring, with emphasis on sensing platforms, spectral information, AI approaches, and barriers to field adoption. Following PRISMA guidelines, literature was retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and early September 2025. A total of 147 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. The reviewed literature shows increased use of UAV and satellite observations, supported by RGB, multispectral, hyperspectral, thermal, and proximal sensing configurations. Among AI methods, convolutional neural networks remain the dominant approach, while machine learning models such as random forest and support vector machines continue to be widely applied, particularly in spectral datasets. Across the reviewed studies, spectral indices and hyperspectral features are recurrent inputs for early stress detection, whereas recent developments increasingly incorporate segmentation, object detection, transformers, and multimodal data fusion. Despite these advances, large-scale implementation remains limited by data availability, cost, variability across field conditions, and insufficient external validation. Overall, the evidence indicates that the integration of remote sensing and AI is advancing toward scalable and operational crop health monitoring systems, although greater emphasis on robustness, transferability, and field deployment is still needed.

Related

  1. Early Detection of Red Palm Weevil Infestation: A Systematic Review of Sensing Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, and Field Readiness
    Lubna A. Gabralla, Amnah Alshahrani
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMC
  2. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies for Smart Farming and Precision Agriculture
    Shruti Tyagi, Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, Arvind Kumar +1
    Phytoresearch and TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text9 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  3. Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Crop Pest and Disease Detection: A Systematic Review
    Zhen Ma, Cundeng Wang, Xinzhong Wang +1
    AgriculturePeer-reviewedCC BY6 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  4. Recent advancements on innovative technologies and applications for non-destructive monitoring of tomato quality
    Yirui Huang, Jiahao Gu, Mingyu Yang +4
    Frontiers in plant sciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. Artificial intelligence for detecting autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qian Wang, Rong Luo, Qianhui Wen
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{valdiviezo2026remote,
  title = {{Remote sensing and artificial intelligence for crop pest and disease monitoring: A systematic review of sensing technologies, AI approaches, and barriers to field adoption}},
  author = {Juan Valdiviezo and Efraín Y. Turpo Cayo and Ronald R. Gutierrez and María Jaramillo-Carrión and Jaime Aguilar-Lome and Luis A. Ruiz and Lía Ramos-Fernández},
  journal = {Smart Agricultural Technology},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1016/j.atech.2026.102279},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.102279},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Remote sensing and artificial intelligence for crop pest and disease monitoring: A systematic review of sensing technologies, AI approaches, and barriers to field adoption
AU  - Juan Valdiviezo
AU  - Efraín Y. Turpo Cayo
AU  - Ronald R. Gutierrez
AU  - María Jaramillo-Carrión
AU  - Jaime Aguilar-Lome
AU  - Luis A. Ruiz
AU  - Lía Ramos-Fernández
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/06
JO  - Smart Agricultural Technology
DO  - 10.1016/j.atech.2026.102279
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.102279
AB  - Pest and disease outbreaks remain a major constraint on agricultural productivity, making reliable crop monitoring a priority for precision agriculture. In this context, remote sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as complementary tools for improving the detection and monitoring of phytosanitary problems across spatial scales. This systematic review synthesizes recent advances in the integration of remote sensing and AI for crop pest and disease monitoring, with emphasis on sensing platforms, spectral information, AI approaches, and barriers to field adoption. Following PRISMA guidelines, literature was retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and early September 2025. A total of 147 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. The reviewed literature shows increased use of UAV and satellite observations, supported by RGB, multispectral, hyperspectral, thermal, and proximal sensing configurations. Among AI methods, convolutional neural networks remain the dominant approach, while machine learning models such as random forest and support vector machines continue to be widely applied, particularly in spectral datasets. Across the reviewed studies, spectral indices and hyperspectral features are recurrent inputs for early stress detection, whereas recent developments increasingly incorporate segmentation, object detection, transformers, and multimodal data fusion. Despite these advances, large-scale implementation remains limited by data availability, cost, variability across field conditions, and insufficient external validation. Overall, the evidence indicates that the integration of remote sensing and AI is advancing toward scalable and operational crop health monitoring systems, although greater emphasis on robustness, transferability, and field deployment is still needed.
SN  - 2772-3755
ER  -