Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP

Optimizing Staging Imaging in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Predictive Factors and Guideline Alignment in Oman

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Radiology, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, Muscat, Oman.
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
  3. 3Department of Biostatistics, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, Muscat, Oman.
  4. 4Department of Breast Surgery, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, Muscat, Oman.

Abstract

Objectives:: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of staging imaging in detecting distant metastases among women with early-stage breast cancer in Oman, assess alignment with international guidelines, and identify key patient factors that could guide selective imaging use.

Methods:: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, including women diagnosed with stage 0–II breast cancer between January 2014 and December 2019. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, imaging modalities, and outcomes were reviewed. Staging imaging included computed tomography (CT) with bone scintigraphy and/or positron emission tomography (PET-CT). The primary outcome was the prevalence of confirmed metastatic disease (M1). Fisher’s exact test was used to assess associations between clinicopathological factors and metastatic yield. The Number Needed to Image (NNI) was calculated to estimate the efficiency of imaging.

Results:: Among 207 patients, 187 (90.3%) underwent staging imaging. Suspicious findings were detected in 10 patients (5.3% of those imaged), but only six cases (3.2% of those imaged; 2.9% of the total cohort) were confirmed as true metastases. All confirmed metastases were identified using CT with bone scans, while PET-CT did not detect any additional cases. Lymph node status was the strongest predictor of metastases (p = 0.011). Node-positive patients had a 19.0% metastasis rate compared with 1.1% among node-negative patients. The NNI was 5 for node-positive versus 93 for node- negative patients, demonstrating the limited value of routine imaging in low-risk groups.

Conclusion:: The overall yield of routine staging imaging in early-stage breast cancer is low, with the greatest benefit observed in node-positive patients. Adopting risk-based, guideline- aligned imaging strategies could reduce unnecessary investigations, patient anxiety, and healthcare costs while ensuring optimal use of resources.

Related

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Endometrial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study
    Arun Sanap, Sachin R Chaudhari, Ashwini Umredkar +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Does predictive accuracy reflect anatomical attention in CVM staging? evidence from explainable held-out vendor evaluation.
    Yanjun Jiang, Yang Lyu, Fengcong Wang +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET versus conventional imaging for Initial T/N/M staging of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a patient-level paired bivariate meta-analysis.
    Haowen Wu, Wei Zhang, Luchen Yang +3
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Predictive analysis in acute ischemic stroke imaging
    Hosam Al-Jehani, Ahmed Hafez Mousa
    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Assessment of predictive efficacy for prognosis of pediatric severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a comprehensive study based on high-resolution computed tomography imaging and platelet parameters
    Xiaoli Zhang, Wenzhuo Liu, Xiaohua Song +4
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{mazrouai2026optimizing,
  title = {{Optimizing Staging Imaging in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Predictive Factors and Guideline Alignment in Oman}},
  author = {Reem Al Mazrouai and Badrya Al Qassabi and Asmaa Alshizawi and Ibtisam Al Qanoobi and Hassan Ahmed Alsayegh and Suaad Alagbari},
  journal = {Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2129},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2129},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimizing Staging Imaging in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Predictive Factors and Guideline Alignment in Oman
AU  - Reem Al Mazrouai
AU  - Badrya Al Qassabi
AU  - Asmaa Alshizawi
AU  - Ibtisam Al Qanoobi
AU  - Hassan Ahmed Alsayegh
AU  - Suaad Alagbari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/19
JO  - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
DO  - 10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2129
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2129
AB  - Objectives:: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of staging imaging in detecting distant metastases among women with early-stage breast cancer in Oman, assess alignment with international guidelines, and identify key patient factors that could guide selective imaging use.  Methods:: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, including women diagnosed with stage 0–II breast cancer between January 2014 and December 2019. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, imaging modalities, and outcomes were reviewed. Staging imaging included computed tomography (CT) with bone scintigraphy and/or positron emission tomography (PET-CT). The primary outcome was the prevalence of confirmed metastatic disease (M1). Fisher’s exact test was used to assess associations between clinicopathological factors and metastatic yield. The Number Needed to Image (NNI) was calculated to estimate the efficiency of imaging.  Results:: Among 207 patients, 187 (90.3%) underwent staging imaging. Suspicious findings were detected in 10 patients (5.3% of those imaged), but only six cases (3.2% of those imaged; 2.9% of the total cohort) were confirmed as true metastases. All confirmed metastases were identified using CT with bone scans, while PET-CT did not detect any additional cases. Lymph node status was the strongest predictor of metastases (p = 0.011). Node-positive patients had a 19.0% metastasis rate compared with 1.1% among node-negative patients. The NNI was 5 for node-positive versus 93 for node- negative patients, demonstrating the limited value of routine imaging in low-risk groups.  Conclusion:: The overall yield of routine staging imaging in early-stage breast cancer is low, with the greatest benefit observed in node-positive patients. Adopting risk-based, guideline- aligned imaging strategies could reduce unnecessary investigations, patient anxiety, and healthcare costs while ensuring optimal use of resources.
SN  - 1513-7368
SN  - 2476-762X
ER  -