Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Does Previous Septoplasty Affect Rhinoplasty Outcomes? A Comparative Analysis of Functional, Psychological and Self-Assessment Measures

  1. 1Department of Otolaryngology with Division of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland
  2. 2Department of Anatomy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction after rhinoseptoplasty depends on both functional outcomes and subjective factors, including self-perception, self-esteem and psychological well-being. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 75 patients qualified for rhinoseptoplasty as follows: 47 women, 62.7%, and 28 men, 37.3%, aged 18–63 years, M = 34.24, and SD = 10.53. Twenty-seven patients (36%) had undergone previous septoplasty, including seven (9.3%) who required auricular cartilage grafting, while 48 patients (64%) had no prior septal surgery. Validated the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), the Standardised Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symp-tom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires were completed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life was assessed with the World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and self-esteem with Self-Esteem Scale, both before and after surgery. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS 29.0, with α = 0.05. Results: The groups showed improvement in aesthetic outcomes. Previous septoplasty was associated with lower overall rhinoplasty satisfaction at one month and lower cosmetic satisfaction at one and six months compared with primary cases (i.e., higher SCHNOS- Cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) scores, on which higher values denote greater dissatisfaction). NOSE scores improved markedly in both groups, while quality of life and self-esteem increased significantly after surgery, regardless of surgical history. Conclusions: Rhinoseptoplasty was followed by significant improvement in nasal function, quality of life and self-esteem; in the absence of a non-operated control group, these changes represent observed pre- to postoperative change rather than proof of surgical causation. Previous septoplasty may be associated with less favourable early functional and aesthetic recovery, but it does not prevent meaningful postoperative improvement. These patients may require more detailed preoperative planning and counselling.

Related

  1. Beyond Physical Recovery: Psychological Factors and Assessment Tools in Return to Sport Decision-making after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction – A Scoping Review
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Psychological therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations: A qualitative assessment of voice-hearers’ experiences and preferences
    Sanne Brederoo, Gerda van Ittersum, Francisca Goedhart +3
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Baseline depressive-symptom severity and divergent psychological trajectories during GIP and/or GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy: a prospective ecological momentary assessment study
    Aika Miya, Michihiro Kaneko, Yuka Ozaki +2
    Diabetology internationalPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  4. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and arabic translation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation
    Feras Alkholaiwi, Yazeed Alghonaim
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. The Course of Nasolabial Angle Loss After Rhinoplasty and Prediction of Late Outcome Using Machine Learning: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    Sinan Seyhan, Levent Uğur, Mehmet Mustafa Erdoğan
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{jadczak2026does,
  title = {{Does Previous Septoplasty Affect Rhinoplasty Outcomes? A Comparative Analysis of Functional, Psychological and Self-Assessment Measures}},
  author = {Marcin Jadczak and Alexandru Valeriu Breazu and Cristian Valentin Toma and Dariusz Jurkiewicz and Sandra Krzywdzińska},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15207819},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7819},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Does Previous Septoplasty Affect Rhinoplasty Outcomes? A Comparative Analysis of Functional, Psychological and Self-Assessment Measures
AU  - Marcin Jadczak
AU  - Alexandru Valeriu Breazu
AU  - Cristian Valentin Toma
AU  - Dariusz Jurkiewicz
AU  - Sandra Krzywdzińska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15207819
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7819
AB  - Background: Patient satisfaction after rhinoseptoplasty depends on both functional outcomes and subjective factors, including self-perception, self-esteem and psychological well-being. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 75 patients qualified for rhinoseptoplasty as follows: 47 women, 62.7%, and 28 men, 37.3%, aged 18–63 years, M = 34.24, and SD = 10.53. Twenty-seven patients (36%) had undergone previous septoplasty, including seven (9.3%) who required auricular cartilage grafting, while 48 patients (64%) had no prior septal surgery. Validated the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), the Standardised Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symp-tom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires were completed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life was assessed with the World Health Organisation Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and self-esteem with Self-Esteem Scale, both before and after surgery. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS 29.0, with α = 0.05. Results: The groups showed improvement in aesthetic outcomes. Previous septoplasty was associated with lower overall rhinoplasty satisfaction at one month and lower cosmetic satisfaction at one and six months compared with primary cases (i.e., higher SCHNOS- Cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) scores, on which higher values denote greater dissatisfaction). NOSE scores improved markedly in both groups, while quality of life and self-esteem increased significantly after surgery, regardless of surgical history. Conclusions: Rhinoseptoplasty was followed by significant improvement in nasal function, quality of life and self-esteem; in the absence of a non-operated control group, these changes represent observed pre- to postoperative change rather than proof of surgical causation. Previous septoplasty may be associated with less favourable early functional and aesthetic recovery, but it does not prevent meaningful postoperative improvement. These patients may require more detailed preoperative planning and counselling.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -