Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAnnals of medicine

T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Northern Jiangsu Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment, Jiangsu University, Yancheng, PR China.
  2. 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng, PR China.
  3. 3Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong, PR China.
  4. 4Department of General Medicine, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, PR China.

Abstract

Background/objectives

Single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor profiling reveal substantial T-cell heterogeneity in aortic dissection (AD), but whether these responses contribute to vascular injury or reflect post-onset immune activation remains uncertain. This review evaluates human and experimental evidence by disease stage, tissue compartment, functional validation, T-cell specificity, and intervention timing, distinguishing descriptive profiling from evidence supporting causal and translational inference.Discussion

Human studies identify Th1/Th17-associated, CD8⁺ cytotoxicity-associated, and regulatory T-cell alterations, with stage-related differences in T-cell composition and clonality. Most evidence is cross-sectional and obtained after clinical onset. Antigen specificity, direct aortic-wall cytotoxicity, impaired Treg suppression, and T-cell-mediated aortic-wall injury remain unproven. Single-cell and TCR profiling identify candidate T-cell states and clonotypes for spatial and functional validation, not causal proof. Among candidate pathways, the IL-6-STAT3-IL-17 axis currently has the strongest AD-specific preclinical rationale, but existing interventions are largely non-T-cell-restricted and initiated before or during disease induction. Stronger causal attribution requires convergent human evidence, post-lesion T-cell-restricted perturbation, disease-progression endpoints, and rescue or target-engagement studies. The subacute phase after anatomical and haemodynamic stabilisation may offer a window to study persistent injury-amplifying T-cell responses, whereas early acute and perioperative immunomodulation remains unsupported.Conclusions

Current evidence supports altered T-cell states after AD onset but does not establish an initiating role. Near-term priorities should be prospective biomarker validation and post-lesion mechanistic studies rather than T-cell-directed immuno-modulation during the early acute and perioperative phases. Clinical translation should await reproducible associations linked to stage-specific causal mechanisms and acceptable safety.

Related

  1. Coordinated upregulation of Hippo, NF-κB and interferon pathway genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective tissue qRT-PCR profiling study with external tumour-versus-non-tumour validation, molecular subtype and survival analyses.
    Eda Balkan, Murat Kızılkaya, Sevilay Özmen +5
    BMC gastroenterologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. ReCAST: Single-Cell-Informed Tumour Microenvironment Profiling for Translational Prognostic Assessment in Esophageal Cancer
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Predicting acute kidney injury in type B aortic dissection: development and validation of a clinical nomogram.
    Weijian Chen, Zhengfei Li, Xiaojun Shu
    Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. A clinicopathological and hematological biomarker-based nomogram for overall survival in early-onset colorectal cancer: development, external validation, and translational implications
    Mingming Su, Changhe Xia, Zhihan Li +8
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Mitochondrial metabolic plasticity in cancer: hybrid bioenergetic states and translational targeting in surgical oncology
    Debdeep Chattopadhyay, Ramya Lakshmi Rajendran, Nida Mubin +6
    Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ye2026tcell,
  title = {{T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation.}},
  author = {Xiang Ye and Yihao Wang and Yeting Li and Hao Zhu and Xia Li and Jianxiang Song},
  journal = {Annals of medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1080/07853890.2026.2753327},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42956058},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - T-cell states in aortic dissection: from molecular immune profiling toward causal and translational validation.
AU  - Xiang Ye
AU  - Yihao Wang
AU  - Yeting Li
AU  - Hao Zhu
AU  - Xia Li
AU  - Jianxiang Song
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Annals of medicine
DO  - 10.1080/07853890.2026.2753327
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42956058
AB  - Background/objectives  Single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor profiling reveal substantial T-cell heterogeneity in aortic dissection (AD), but whether these responses contribute to vascular injury or reflect post-onset immune activation remains uncertain. This review evaluates human and experimental evidence by disease stage, tissue compartment, functional validation, T-cell specificity, and intervention timing, distinguishing descriptive profiling from evidence supporting causal and translational inference.Discussion  Human studies identify Th1/Th17-associated, CD8⁺ cytotoxicity-associated, and regulatory T-cell alterations, with stage-related differences in T-cell composition and clonality. Most evidence is cross-sectional and obtained after clinical onset. Antigen specificity, direct aortic-wall cytotoxicity, impaired Treg suppression, and T-cell-mediated aortic-wall injury remain unproven. Single-cell and TCR profiling identify candidate T-cell states and clonotypes for spatial and functional validation, not causal proof. Among candidate pathways, the IL-6-STAT3-IL-17 axis currently has the strongest AD-specific preclinical rationale, but existing interventions are largely non-T-cell-restricted and initiated before or during disease induction. Stronger causal attribution requires convergent human evidence, post-lesion T-cell-restricted perturbation, disease-progression endpoints, and rescue or target-engagement studies. The subacute phase after anatomical and haemodynamic stabilisation may offer a window to study persistent injury-amplifying T-cell responses, whereas early acute and perioperative immunomodulation remains unsupported.Conclusions  Current evidence supports altered T-cell states after AD onset but does not establish an initiating role. Near-term priorities should be prospective biomarker validation and post-lesion mechanistic studies rather than T-cell-directed immuno-modulation during the early acute and perioperative phases. Clinical translation should await reproducible associations linked to stage-specific causal mechanisms and acceptable safety.
SN  - 0785-3890
SN  - 1365-2060
ER  -