Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

AI and The Enclosure of the Scientific Commons

Abstract

The scientific literature can be viewed as an "information commons:" an intangible resource that "no one owns and is shared by everyone." There are well-established economic and political frameworks for understanding such commons, emerging from the history of agricultural common lands found in places like preindustrial England. This article provides a primer on the history and these frameworks, and considers a key difference between the information commons and the fields of yore: while information commons are robust and immensely valuable --- some can be said to rank among humanity's greatest achievements --- the English agricultural commons no longer meaningfully exist. The latter are gone not because of the well-known "tragedy of the commons," but rather a phenomenon known as the enclosure movement (~1600--1800) that transformed the common lands into private property. Many observers, then and now, judge enclosure to have been theft at a societal scale. This article argues that artificial intelligence (AI) provides precisely the tools needed to enable a previously-infeasible enclosure of the information commons. Although AI-enabled enclosure does not operate identically to physical enclosure, it shares the key features of turning the commons into private wealth and undermining the social systems that support them (via "slop spam"). The concepts presented in this article can provide a scholarly basis for interrogating the foreboding feeling that AI may represent not just a smash-and-grab, but an attack upon a whole way of life.

Related

  1. AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology I: Literature Review
    Anamaria Hell, Kateryna Vovk, Veena Krishnaraj +18
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
  2. AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology II: Project Planning and Proposal Evaluation
    Jia Liu, Veena Krishnaraj, Kateryna Vovk +18
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
  3. Beyond χ2: Ensemble null tests for reliable scientific discovery
    Adrian E. Bayer, David N. Spergel
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  4. Astrobiology and the Transformation of Scientific Epistemology
    Kristina Šekrst
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPlanetary science & exoplanetsGeneral physicsarXiv
  5. Dark Matter Particle Explorer: Ten-Year On-Orbit Performance and Scientific Outcomes
    Jian-Hua Guo, Chuan Yue, Yun-Long Zhang +2
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{williams2026enclosure,
  title = {{AI and The Enclosure of the Scientific Commons}},
  author = {P. K. G. Williams},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.27251},
  eprint = {2610.27251},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27251},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - AI and The Enclosure of the Scientific Commons
AU  - P. K. G. Williams
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27251
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27251
AB  - The scientific literature can be viewed as an "information commons:" an intangible resource that "no one owns and is shared by everyone." There are well-established economic and political frameworks for understanding such commons, emerging from the history of agricultural common lands found in places like preindustrial England. This article provides a primer on the history and these frameworks, and considers a key difference between the information commons and the fields of yore: while information commons are robust and immensely valuable --- some can be said to rank among humanity's greatest achievements --- the English agricultural commons no longer meaningfully exist. The latter are gone not because of the well-known "tragedy of the commons," but rather a phenomenon known as the enclosure movement (~1600--1800) that transformed the common lands into private property. Many observers, then and now, judge enclosure to have been theft at a societal scale. This article argues that artificial intelligence (AI) provides precisely the tools needed to enable a previously-infeasible enclosure of the information commons. Although AI-enabled enclosure does not operate identically to physical enclosure, it shares the key features of turning the commons into private wealth and undermining the social systems that support them (via "slop spam"). The concepts presented in this article can provide a scholarly basis for interrogating the foreboding feeling that AI may represent not just a smash-and-grab, but an attack upon a whole way of life.
ER  -