Restoration for whom and by whom? Contrasting narratives across COP30 arenas highlight the challenges of integrated implementation
Abstract
Ecological restoration is central to global climate and biodiversity agendas, yet translating international commitments into inclusive and effective implementation remains challenging. UN climate conferences provide important arenas where these priorities are negotiated. We examined how forest restoration was framed across different arenas at the 30th Conference of the Parties (COP30) to the UNFCCC, held in Belém, Brazilian Amazon, in 2025, and assessed differences in restoration narratives and stakeholder roles. Our team of 17 researchers attended 50 of the 125 identified restoration-related events across five COP30 arenas, systematically documenting and classifying dominant restoration narratives and the roles attributed to different stakeholders. Restoration narratives differed markedly across arenas. The Blue Zone emphasized finance, investment risk reduction, and large-scale restoration, primarily portraying Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities as beneficiaries or implementation partners. The Green Zone focused on legal commitments, technical feasibility, innovation, and monitoring, while recognizing broader stakeholder participation. The People’s COP emphasized territorial rights, food systems, and community-led restoration, positioning local actors as protagonists. The AgriZone combined technological and financial approaches with socially grounded perspectives. Interactions among actors advocating different restoration approaches were limited. Restoration narratives at COP30 reflected distinct priorities and conceptions of stakeholder roles, with limited opportunities for interaction across arenas. These differences highlight the need for restoration governance processes that connect financial and technical priorities with community-defined goals, territorial rights, and locally grounded restoration practices.
Related
- Integrated Phytoremediation and Microbial Mitigation Strategies for Sustainable Restoration of Toxic Metal-Contaminated Soils.
- Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks and isotopic signatures under contrasting integrated crop-ivestock systems in sub-humid Zimbabwe
- Concretising the transformative challenges of a participatory process through Sen's framework: first insights of an on-the-ground implementation
- Alternative digital secondary education for marginalized, out-of-school youth in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a scoping review of intervention models, outcomes, and implementation challenges
- Integrated Intensification and Nutrient Recovery Strategies in Two-Stage Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge and the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: State of the Art, Engineering Challenges of Scale-Up, and Perspectives
BibTeX
@misc{ferreira2026restoration,
title = {{Restoration for whom and by whom? Contrasting narratives across COP30 arenas highlight the challenges of integrated implementation}},
author = {Joice Ferreira and Beatriz Abreu and Davison Assis and Samantha Anunciação and Anderlany Aragão dos Santos and José Corrêa-Neto and Emilie Coudel and Fernando Elias and Aline Fernandes and Alexander C. Lees and Leonardo S. Miranda and Rayssa Yuki Murakami-Lima and Sâmia Nunes and Mariana Piva and Divino Vicente Silverio and Lis Stegmann and Jos Barlow},
howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.31223/x54v55},
url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15996/},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Restoration for whom and by whom? Contrasting narratives across COP30 arenas highlight the challenges of integrated implementation
AU - Joice Ferreira
AU - Beatriz Abreu
AU - Davison Assis
AU - Samantha Anunciação
AU - Anderlany Aragão dos Santos
AU - José Corrêa-Neto
AU - Emilie Coudel
AU - Fernando Elias
AU - Aline Fernandes
AU - Alexander C. Lees
AU - Leonardo S. Miranda
AU - Rayssa Yuki Murakami-Lima
AU - Sâmia Nunes
AU - Mariana Piva
AU - Divino Vicente Silverio
AU - Lis Stegmann
AU - Jos Barlow
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
PB - EarthArXiv
DO - 10.31223/x54v55
UR - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15996/
AB - Ecological restoration is central to global climate and biodiversity agendas, yet translating international commitments into inclusive and effective implementation remains challenging. UN climate conferences provide important arenas where these priorities are negotiated. We examined how forest restoration was framed across different arenas at the 30th Conference of the Parties (COP30) to the UNFCCC, held in Belém, Brazilian Amazon, in 2025, and assessed differences in restoration narratives and stakeholder roles. Our team of 17 researchers attended 50 of the 125 identified restoration-related events across five COP30 arenas, systematically documenting and classifying dominant restoration narratives and the roles attributed to different stakeholders. Restoration narratives differed markedly across arenas. The Blue Zone emphasized finance, investment risk reduction, and large-scale restoration, primarily portraying Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities as beneficiaries or implementation partners. The Green Zone focused on legal commitments, technical feasibility, innovation, and monitoring, while recognizing broader stakeholder participation. The People’s COP emphasized territorial rights, food systems, and community-led restoration, positioning local actors as protagonists. The AgriZone combined technological and financial approaches with socially grounded perspectives. Interactions among actors advocating different restoration approaches were limited. Restoration narratives at COP30 reflected distinct priorities and conceptions of stakeholder roles, with limited opportunities for interaction across arenas. These differences highlight the need for restoration governance processes that connect financial and technical priorities with community-defined goals, territorial rights, and locally grounded restoration practices.
ER -