Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in oncology

Risk factors for recurrence after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer

  1. 1Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University , , ,
  2. 2Department of Urology, Panzhihua Central Hospital , , ,

Abstract

Background: Recurrence remains common after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aimed to identify routinely available clinicopathological, treatment-related, and inflammatory factors associated with recurrence and to characterize recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort included patients with pathologically confirmed Ta, T1, or primary carcinoma in situ (CIS) who underwent initial TURBT between January 2017 and December 2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used as the primary analysis to evaluate factors associated with documented recurrence during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed as a complementary analysis incorporating recurrence timing and censoring. Kaplan–Meier analysis, sensitivity analyses, restricted cubic spline analysis, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, and bootstrap-corrected model evaluation were also performed.

Results: Among 605 patients, 237 (39.2%) experienced recurrence during a median follow-up of 34.0 months. Multiple tumors were associated with higher recurrence odds and hazard (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–2.78; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.25–2.10). Higher recurrence odds and hazards were also associated with increasing tumor diameter, T1 or primary CIS, high-grade pathology, concomitant CIS, and higher baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Maintenance intravesical therapy was inversely associated with recurrence (adjusted OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34–0.72; adjusted HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47–0.81). Estimated RFS rates were 81.5%, 63.8%, and 54.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The bootstrap-corrected area under the curve was 0.769 for the logistic model, and the bootstrap-corrected Harrell’s C-index was 0.739 for the Cox model.

Conclusions: Recurrence after initial TURBT was associated with greater tumor burden, adverse pathological characteristics, concomitant CIS, and higher baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Maintenance intravesical therapy showed an inverse observational association with recurrence. These routinely available factors may support postoperative risk stratification and risk-adapted surveillance.

Related

  1. Preoperative Systemic Inflammatory Indices (SII, SIRI and PIV) Associated with Adverse Histology and 12-Month Recurrence After Transurethral Resection of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Dragoș Florin Vasile, Mihnea Meșină, George G. Mitroi +5
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  2. Blue versus white light for transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Philipp Maisch, Mohammad Hamidi Madani, Alex Koziarz +3
    Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text19 citedOncologyOpenAlexPMC
  3. Multidisciplinary Treatment of Abdominal Wall Recurrence After Bladder Perforation During Transurethral Resection of a Bladder Tumor
    Tomoki Kimura, Takaharu Hamada, Shota Umezawa +6
    IJU case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Expression of STAT3 and STAT6 in Men with Large Versus Small Prostates Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
    Chung Lyul Lee, Ji Yong Lee, Seung Woo Yang +2
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The influencing factors of postoperative sleep disturbance in elderly patients undergoing transurethral prostate surgery and the construction and validation of a machine learning prediction model
    Jingxian Huang, Huageng Huang, Yuhua Zhou +1
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{yuan2026risk,
  title = {{Risk factors for recurrence after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer}},
  author = {Fang Yuan and Xiong Li and Jing Zhang and Jian-Yong Gao},
  journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1861461},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13668579},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Risk factors for recurrence after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer
AU  - Fang Yuan
AU  - Xiong Li
AU  - Jing Zhang
AU  - Jian-Yong Gao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Frontiers in oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1861461
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13668579
AB  - Background: Recurrence remains common after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aimed to identify routinely available clinicopathological, treatment-related, and inflammatory factors associated with recurrence and to characterize recurrence-free survival (RFS).  Methods: This retrospective cohort included patients with pathologically confirmed Ta, T1, or primary carcinoma in situ (CIS) who underwent initial TURBT between January 2017 and December 2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used as the primary analysis to evaluate factors associated with documented recurrence during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed as a complementary analysis incorporating recurrence timing and censoring. Kaplan–Meier analysis, sensitivity analyses, restricted cubic spline analysis, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, and bootstrap-corrected model evaluation were also performed.  Results: Among 605 patients, 237 (39.2%) experienced recurrence during a median follow-up of 34.0 months. Multiple tumors were associated with higher recurrence odds and hazard (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–2.78; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.25–2.10). Higher recurrence odds and hazards were also associated with increasing tumor diameter, T1 or primary CIS, high-grade pathology, concomitant CIS, and higher baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Maintenance intravesical therapy was inversely associated with recurrence (adjusted OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34–0.72; adjusted HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47–0.81). Estimated RFS rates were 81.5%, 63.8%, and 54.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The bootstrap-corrected area under the curve was 0.769 for the logistic model, and the bootstrap-corrected Harrell’s C-index was 0.739 for the Cox model.  Conclusions: Recurrence after initial TURBT was associated with greater tumor burden, adverse pathological characteristics, concomitant CIS, and higher baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Maintenance intravesical therapy showed an inverse observational association with recurrence. These routinely available factors may support postoperative risk stratification and risk-adapted surveillance.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -