Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Distributionally robust linear regression through the lens of adversarial training

Abstract

Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) studies parameter estimation under uncertainty in the underlying probability distribution and has emerged as a principled framework for analyzing robustness and generalization. In particular, Wasserstein DRO, with distributional uncertainty induced by the Wasserstein distance, generalizes several popular regularizers. This paper studies Wasserstein DRO linear regression, unifying square-root Lasso and adversarial linear regression as important special cases. We prove that many properties of these two special cases carry over to this general method. In particular, we show (i) deterministic and non-asymptotic in-sample error bounds O(n−1/2) in general and O(n−1) under design matrix and sparsity conditions; (ii) insensitivity to the noise level, also known as the pivotal property; and (iii) solution equivalences for small and large ambiguity sets. The key proof step is to recast the method into a quadratic form, mimicking adversarial linear regression. We also show that the method can be solved efficiently, and we validate our findings through numerical simulations.

Related

  1. Conservative neural posterior estimation via distributionally robust training
    William Laplante, Yuga Hikida, Charita Dellaporta +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Stochastic Mirror-Prox Optimisation of Group Distributionally Robust Multimodal Logistic Regression for Multilingual Fact-Checking Verdict Prediction
    Shuyun Li, Fan Si, Dongxu Mo +1
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  3. Brenier Meets Adversarial Training: Optimal Transport Geometry for Robust Learning
    Alireza Abdollahpoorrostam, Ehsan Sharifian, Buse Şen +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  4. Data-driven joint optimization of maintenance and spare parts provisioning: A distributionally robust approach
    Weijun Xie, Nagi Gebraeel, Stephen Robinson +1
    European Journal of Operational ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not stated2 citedOptimisation & controlHAL
  5. Optimality of Affine Policies in Distributionally Robust Linear-Quadratic Control with Temporally Correlated Noise
    Jakob Nylöf, Daniel Kuhn, John Lygeros +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{stefansson2026distributionally,
  title = {{Distributionally robust linear regression through the lens of adversarial training}},
  author = {Elis Stefansson and David Vävinggren and Antônio H. Ribeiro},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.39449},
  eprint = {2609.39449},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39449},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Distributionally robust linear regression through the lens of adversarial training
AU  - Elis Stefansson
AU  - David Vävinggren
AU  - Antônio H. Ribeiro
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.39449
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39449
AB  - Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) studies parameter estimation under uncertainty in the underlying probability distribution and has emerged as a principled framework for analyzing robustness and generalization. In particular, Wasserstein DRO, with distributional uncertainty induced by the Wasserstein distance, generalizes several popular regularizers. This paper studies Wasserstein DRO linear regression, unifying square-root Lasso and adversarial linear regression as important special cases. We prove that many properties of these two special cases carry over to this general method. In particular, we show (i) deterministic and non-asymptotic in-sample error bounds O(n^−1/2) in general and O(n^−1) under design matrix and sparsity conditions; (ii) insensitivity to the noise level, also known as the pivotal property; and (iii) solution equivalences for small and large ambiguity sets. The key proof step is to recast the method into a quadratic form, mimicking adversarial linear regression. We also show that the method can be solved efficiently, and we validate our findings through numerical simulations.
ER  -