Beyond Match Results: Bayesian Mediation of Ability, Performance, and Winning in Professional Tennis
Abstract
Match results measure competitive ability, but they do not explain how ability is expressed during play. Match statistics offer a natural mediator, however performance is usually measured over the same match as the outcome: a full-match statistic uses events that help determine the winner, while a first-set statistic is earlier but rests on fewer service points and still contributes to the result. Comparing the two therefore mixes timing and precision. We develop a Bayesian mediation framework for this problem. Dynamic abilities on hard, clay, and grass courts are estimated from previous seasons only and are linked to both players' service performance, and a Bradley--Terry model relates ability and performance to the match result. A control mediator samples the first set's number of service points from the full match, separating the measurement window from the point count. In 3,820 men's matches, the hard-court mediated share rises from 0.52 with a first-set mediator to 0.95 with a full-match mediator; the point-count contrast accounts for 0.30 of this gap and the window contrast for 0.13. The pattern replicates on the women's tour. Simulations and sensitivity analyzes examine the decomposition and assumptions needed for a causal interpretation.
Related
- Software Application Profile: BKMR-CMA: a novel R command for Bayesian mediation analysis in environmental mixture studies
- Mediation and moderation in distance-based regression with triangular fuzzy data: simulation evidence and an application to academic performance
- From accounting systems to business performance: A serial mediation model with IPMA evidence from Vietnamese SMEs
- Bivariate Frank Copula: Some More Results on Point Estimation of the Association Parameter from a Bayesian Perspective and Revisiting the Goodness of Fit Tests with an Application to Model Groundwater Data from Dong Thap, Vietnam
- Bayesian probabilistic statements for communicating clinical trial results.
BibTeX
@misc{hu2026beyond,
title = {{Beyond Match Results: Bayesian Mediation of Ability, Performance, and Winning in Professional Tennis}},
author = {Guanyu Hu and Xiao Wang},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.21023},
eprint = {2610.21023},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21023},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Beyond Match Results: Bayesian Mediation of Ability, Performance, and Winning in Professional Tennis
AU - Guanyu Hu
AU - Xiao Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.21023
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21023
AB - Match results measure competitive ability, but they do not explain how ability is expressed during play. Match statistics offer a natural mediator, however performance is usually measured over the same match as the outcome: a full-match statistic uses events that help determine the winner, while a first-set statistic is earlier but rests on fewer service points and still contributes to the result. Comparing the two therefore mixes timing and precision. We develop a Bayesian mediation framework for this problem. Dynamic abilities on hard, clay, and grass courts are estimated from previous seasons only and are linked to both players' service performance, and a Bradley--Terry model relates ability and performance to the match result. A control mediator samples the first set's number of service points from the full match, separating the measurement window from the point count. In 3,820 men's matches, the hard-court mediated share rises from 0.52 with a first-set mediator to 0.95 with a full-match mediator; the point-count contrast accounts for 0.30 of this gap and the window contrast for 0.13. The pattern replicates on the women's tour. Simulations and sensitivity analyzes examine the decomposition and assumptions needed for a causal interpretation.
ER -