Validating Spectral Quality Measures as Proxies for Task Performance: A Controlled-Perturbation Framework for Raman Spectroscopy
Abstract
Raman preprocessing and enhancement methods are often assessed by comparing their output with a clean reference spectrum using measures such as mean squared error (MSE). Whether these spectral quality measures reflect downstream analytical performance is rarely tested. We propose a controlled-perturbation framework for this test. Five perturbation types (baseline distortion, independent noise, correlated noise, global wavenumber shift, and nonlinear axis warping) at eight strengths produce paired changes in a quality measure (metric harm) and in downstream performance (task harm). The alignment gap (AG) quantifies how much a single monotone metric-to-task relationship, fitted by isotonic regression, improves when each perturbation type receives its own relationship. Ordering concordance (OC), a clustered Kendall-type index, measures how often a measure ranks conditions of different perturbation types in the same order as their task harm. Cluster-bootstrap intervals and Holm-adjusted sign-flip tests compare twelve candidate measures with MSE. Three public datasets are used: bacterial classification by principal component analysis and logistic regression, sugar-mixture quantification by partial least squares regression, and mineral identification by cosine library matching. Models are fitted to unperturbed or to correspondingly perturbed training spectra. For bacterial classifiers fitted to unperturbed spectra, Wasserstein distance improved both statistics relative to MSE (Holm-adjusted p < 0.05), also after axis perturbations were removed or spectra were compared on a common grid; refitting to perturbed spectra reversed this advantage. Peak-based measures and a structure-to-noise ratio improved both statistics only for refitted sugar calibrations, and no candidate did so for mineral identification. Open code supports testing new measures.
Related
- Validating and comparing reported indoor photovoltaic performance
- Vibro-polaritonic Raman spectroscopy via cavity Born-Oppenheimer perturbation theory
- General many-body perturbation framework for moiré systems
- Intelligent Microscopy for Materials: Leakage-Controlled SEM Morphology Classification with Calibration, Explainability, and Artifact Perturbation
- A transferable perturbation proteomics framework for phenotype- 1 based annotation and antiproliferative potency scoring of antineoplastic agents
BibTeX
@misc{qin2026validating,
title = {{Validating Spectral Quality Measures as Proxies for Task Performance: A Controlled-Perturbation Framework for Raman Spectroscopy}},
author = {Xiuyi Qin},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.28874},
eprint = {2609.28874},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28874},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Validating Spectral Quality Measures as Proxies for Task Performance: A Controlled-Perturbation Framework for Raman Spectroscopy
AU - Xiuyi Qin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.28874
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28874
AB - Raman preprocessing and enhancement methods are often assessed by comparing their output with a clean reference spectrum using measures such as mean squared error (MSE). Whether these spectral quality measures reflect downstream analytical performance is rarely tested. We propose a controlled-perturbation framework for this test. Five perturbation types (baseline distortion, independent noise, correlated noise, global wavenumber shift, and nonlinear axis warping) at eight strengths produce paired changes in a quality measure (metric harm) and in downstream performance (task harm). The alignment gap (AG) quantifies how much a single monotone metric-to-task relationship, fitted by isotonic regression, improves when each perturbation type receives its own relationship. Ordering concordance (OC), a clustered Kendall-type index, measures how often a measure ranks conditions of different perturbation types in the same order as their task harm. Cluster-bootstrap intervals and Holm-adjusted sign-flip tests compare twelve candidate measures with MSE. Three public datasets are used: bacterial classification by principal component analysis and logistic regression, sugar-mixture quantification by partial least squares regression, and mineral identification by cosine library matching. Models are fitted to unperturbed or to correspondingly perturbed training spectra. For bacterial classifiers fitted to unperturbed spectra, Wasserstein distance improved both statistics relative to MSE (Holm-adjusted p < 0.05), also after axis perturbations were removed or spectra were compared on a common grid; refitting to perturbed spectra reversed this advantage. Peak-based measures and a structure-to-noise ratio improved both statistics only for refitted sugar calibrations, and no candidate did so for mineral identification. Open code supports testing new measures.
ER -