Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in physiology

Fetal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review.

  1. 1Department of Orthodontic Science, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. 2Department of Preventive Oral Health Care Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. 3Center of Excellence in Precision Medicine and Digital Health, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract

Introduction

Maternal obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the broader spectrum of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during pregnancy may be associated with fetal and neonatal outcomes, but the literature is heterogeneous and uses clinically distinct exposure definitions. This systematic review aimed to evaluate associations between maternal SDB and fetal/neonatal outcomes while preserving differences in exposure ascertainment.Methods

Following PRISMA 2020, the review was re-audited using updated PubMed and Web of Science searches, backward and forward citation searching, and ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP registry searches. Exposures were classified as (1) objectively confirmed OSA/SDB, (2) administrative-code-defined OSA, and (3) symptom-, snoring-, or questionnaire-defined SDB risk. No meta-analysis was conducted because clinically comparable subsets were insufficient for quantitative pooling.Results

The completed re-audit identified 64 eligible publications mapped to 53 conservative cohort/dataset families (55 if two probable overlap pairs are treated as separate): 22 objective/physiologic, 11 administrative/clinical, and 31 symptom/questionnaire publications. Objective studies showed mixed findings, with fetal-growth or neonatal signals in selected cohorts but null findings in several other objectively assessed populations. Administrative-code OSA was repeatedly associated with preterm birth and selected neonatal outcomes, although exposure misclassification and residual confounding remain important. Symptom/questionnaire studies were heterogeneous, with associations varying by symptom definition, timing, and outcome.Conclusion

Current evidence does not establish a consistent fetal or neonatal risk pattern for objectively confirmed maternal OSA/SDB. Administrative-code and symptom/questionnaire evidence suggests associations for selected outcomes, particularly preterm birth, but should not be interpreted as a single homogeneous OSA effect.Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251110706.

Related

  1. Sleep‐Disordered Breathing and Sleep Fragmentation in Relation to Atrial Fibrillation Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Ermias Sori, Hassaan Abid, Zartasha +7
    Journal of arrhythmiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Maternal and Antenatal Complications in Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Intra-Abdominal Umbilical Vein Varix
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Comparative Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Teenage and Adult Pregnancies: A Retrospective Study From Western India
    Sweta Shrivastava, Aadisha Jain, Keisha Goel +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Antenatal Intravenous Iron Therapy in Anemic Pregnancies: Associations with Obstetric Patient Blood Management and Neonatal Outcomes
    Eleonora Romani, Francesca Parisi, Sara Zullino +8
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  5. Electrocardiographic Changes Following Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy for Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Pilot Prospective Study
    Francisco Alves de Sousa, Mariline Santos, Marta Rios +3
    Pediatric reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{niisaka2026fetal,
  title = {{Fetal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review.}},
  author = {Mayu Niisaka and Jun Hosomichi and Sakina Mitsuishi and Shiho Kino and Takashi Ono},
  journal = {Frontiers in physiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fphys.2026.1775697},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898148},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Fetal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review.
AU  - Mayu Niisaka
AU  - Jun Hosomichi
AU  - Sakina Mitsuishi
AU  - Shiho Kino
AU  - Takashi Ono
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in physiology
DO  - 10.3389/fphys.2026.1775697
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898148
AB  - Introduction  Maternal obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the broader spectrum of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during pregnancy may be associated with fetal and neonatal outcomes, but the literature is heterogeneous and uses clinically distinct exposure definitions. This systematic review aimed to evaluate associations between maternal SDB and fetal/neonatal outcomes while preserving differences in exposure ascertainment.Methods  Following PRISMA 2020, the review was re-audited using updated PubMed and Web of Science searches, backward and forward citation searching, and ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP registry searches. Exposures were classified as (1) objectively confirmed OSA/SDB, (2) administrative-code-defined OSA, and (3) symptom-, snoring-, or questionnaire-defined SDB risk. No meta-analysis was conducted because clinically comparable subsets were insufficient for quantitative pooling.Results  The completed re-audit identified 64 eligible publications mapped to 53 conservative cohort/dataset families (55 if two probable overlap pairs are treated as separate): 22 objective/physiologic, 11 administrative/clinical, and 31 symptom/questionnaire publications. Objective studies showed mixed findings, with fetal-growth or neonatal signals in selected cohorts but null findings in several other objectively assessed populations. Administrative-code OSA was repeatedly associated with preterm birth and selected neonatal outcomes, although exposure misclassification and residual confounding remain important. Symptom/questionnaire studies were heterogeneous, with associations varying by symptom definition, timing, and outcome.Conclusion  Current evidence does not establish a consistent fetal or neonatal risk pattern for objectively confirmed maternal OSA/SDB. Administrative-code and symptom/questionnaire evidence suggests associations for selected outcomes, particularly preterm birth, but should not be interpreted as a single homogeneous OSA effect.Systematic review registration  https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251110706.
SN  - 1664-042X
ER  -