Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health

Lived experiences from FETP field deployments in resource-limited settings

  1. 1Chato Zonal Referral Hospital, P.O. Box 43, Kitela, Chato DC, Geita Region, Tanzania
  2. 2Tanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program
  3. 3National AIDS, STIs and Hepatitis Control Programme, Tanzania

Abstract

Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETPs) provide hands-on experience in outbreak response, disease surveillance, mentorship, and other public health activities. Although the contributions of field epidemiologists are well recognized, the operational and human realities of field deployments, particularly in resource-limited settings, remain poorly documented. This perspective describes lived experiences from outbreak response, surveillance, and mentorship activities conducted in Tanzania. A narrative reflective approach was used to document firsthand field experiences from outbreak response, surveillance, and mentorship activities conducted in different regions of Tanzania. Approximately 10 field experiences were considered, from which four were selected and developed into narrative accounts. The experiences were reviewed to identify common issues and lessons that guided the presentation of the reflections. Four narratives illustrate the practical realities of field epidemiology, including poor communication networks, difficult travel and infrastructure, sociocultural challenges during community engagement and logistical uncertainties encountered during outbreak response and mentorship activities. The narratives illustrate that field epidemiology involves more than surveillance and outbreak response and is shaped by the social, environmental and operational conditions in which field teams work. The experiences highlight the importance of preparation, adaptability, community engagement and appropriate support when working in remote and resource-limited settings. Sharing such experiences can contribute to better preparation and planning for future field deployments.

Related

  1. Health system readiness for out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest management in resource limited settings: A mixed-method study from rural and suburban Sindh, Pakistan
    Mirza Noor Ali Baig, Zafar Fatmi, Nadeem Ullah Khan +3
    Resuscitation plusPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Development and quality evaluation of lyophilized plasma external quality assessment samples for coagulation testing in resource-limited settings
    Ngoc Nguyen Vo, Huu Tam Tran, Thi Hong Phuong Nguyen +5
    Practical laboratory medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Remote behavioural activation therapy for depressive symptoms among older adults in resource-limited settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jingying Wang, Jianfei Xie, Yating Luo +8
    Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  4. Delphi consensus guidelines for fungal sepsis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients in resource-limited settings: fungal infection study forum expert recommendations
    Shivaprakash Mandya Rudramurthy, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Ritesh Agarwal +18
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  5. Interpersonal Trauma, Marginalization, and Low-Resource Settings: Understanding Sexual and Gender Minority People’s Help-Seeking and Service Utilization Experiences
    Jillian R. Scheer, Sasha Zabelski, Gabriella Epshteyn +6
    Journal of child sexual abusePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text1 citedPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{zuberi2026lived,
  title = {{Lived experiences from FETP field deployments in resource-limited settings}},
  author = {Sued Yassin Zuberi and Ally Kassim Hussein and Nsiande Lema and Devotha Leonard and Loveness Urio and Amir Juya and Grace Mlingi and Baraka Nyakuya and Ipyana Frank Mwandelile and Brian Mawalla},
  journal = {Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.37432/jieph-d-26-00261},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-26-00261},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Lived experiences from FETP field deployments in resource-limited settings
AU  - Sued Yassin Zuberi
AU  - Ally Kassim Hussein
AU  - Nsiande Lema
AU  - Devotha Leonard
AU  - Loveness Urio
AU  - Amir Juya
AU  - Grace Mlingi
AU  - Baraka Nyakuya
AU  - Ipyana Frank Mwandelile
AU  - Brian Mawalla
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health
DO  - 10.37432/jieph-d-26-00261
UR  - https://doi.org/10.37432/jieph-d-26-00261
AB  - Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETPs) provide hands-on experience in outbreak response, disease surveillance, mentorship, and other public health activities. Although the contributions of field epidemiologists are well recognized, the operational and human realities of field deployments, particularly in resource-limited settings, remain poorly documented. This perspective describes lived experiences from outbreak response, surveillance, and mentorship activities conducted in Tanzania. A narrative reflective approach was used to document firsthand field experiences from outbreak response, surveillance, and mentorship activities conducted in different regions of Tanzania. Approximately 10 field experiences were considered, from which four were selected and developed into narrative accounts. The experiences were reviewed to identify common issues and lessons that guided the presentation of the reflections. Four narratives illustrate the practical realities of field epidemiology, including poor communication networks, difficult travel and infrastructure, sociocultural challenges during community engagement and logistical uncertainties encountered during outbreak response and mentorship activities. The narratives illustrate that field epidemiology involves more than surveillance and outbreak response and is shaped by the social, environmental and operational conditions in which field teams work. The experiences highlight the importance of preparation, adaptability, community engagement and appropriate support when working in remote and resource-limited settings. Sharing such experiences can contribute to better preparation and planning for future field deployments.
SN  - 2664-2824
ER  -