Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

StaBLE: digital metrics capture balance performance across a wide spectrum of balance tasks and abilities

  1. 1Stanford University

Abstract

Balance is fundamental to mobility and independence, yet it remains difficult to measure in a way that is both clinically meaningful and feasible for widespread adoption. There is a need for more quantitative, objective, and accessible balance assessments. To this end, we created the Stanford Balance Level Evaluation (StaBLE), a battery of 18 balance-challenging tasks and accompanying digital performance metrics computed from video that aimed to capture widely ranging balance abilities across 180 participants. We validated the StaBLE score against existing clinical scales and found that it correlated with age ({rho} = -0.76, p<0.001), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale ({rho} = 0.60, p<0.001), a Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test task ({tau}=0.55, p<0.001), 4-Stage Balance Test ({tau} = 0.55, p<0.001), and Short Physical Performance Battery ({tau} =0.57, p<0.001). StaBLE overcame ceiling effects in these existing scales and had a different underlying distribution for those identified at risk of falling and not (KS: 0.67, p<0.001). To reduce the time it takes to perform the test, we identified subsets of balance tasks that best predicted the StaBLE score across different populations. Together, our dataset, balance assessment protocol, and performance-based score demonstrate the validity of digital measures of balance.

Related

  1. Spatial perspective-taking abilities on ambiguous tactile stimuli: The case of children with autism spectrum disorder or developmental coordination disorder
    Jean Xavier, Armand Verley, David Cohen +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyPLOS
  2. Heliozoan cellular architecture predicts prey capture performance and growth rate
    P. E. Schavemaker, M. Lynch
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  3. Performance comparison of probe-capture enrichment sequencing of viruses in wastewater influent and settled solids from the California Central Valley
    A. Lavon, J. M. Pender, R. Olson +7
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  4. Hit Selection Using SSMD-Based Machine Learning Performance Metrics in High-Throughput Screening Assays
    Xiaohua Douglas Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyStatisticsarXiv
  5. Dissociable episodic memory performance and subjective experience across the aphantasia imagery spectrum
    W. Duckett, J. Simons
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{heigold2026stable,
  title = {{StaBLE: digital metrics capture balance performance across a wide spectrum of balance tasks and abilities}},
  author = {H. Heigold and P. S. Ruth and J. Muccini and D. Lee and S. Barta and A. Rodrigues and T. Hastie and K. K. Steenerson and S. L. Delp},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.16.750744},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.750744v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - StaBLE: digital metrics capture balance performance across a wide spectrum of balance tasks and abilities
AU  - H. Heigold
AU  - P. S. Ruth
AU  - J. Muccini
AU  - D. Lee
AU  - S. Barta
AU  - A. Rodrigues
AU  - T. Hastie
AU  - K. K. Steenerson
AU  - S. L. Delp
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.16.750744
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.16.750744v1
AB  - Balance is fundamental to mobility and independence, yet it remains difficult to measure in a way that is both clinically meaningful and feasible for widespread adoption. There is a need for more quantitative, objective, and accessible balance assessments. To this end, we created the Stanford Balance Level Evaluation (StaBLE), a battery of 18 balance-challenging tasks and accompanying digital performance metrics computed from video that aimed to capture widely ranging balance abilities across 180 participants. We validated the StaBLE score against existing clinical scales and found that it correlated with age ({rho} = -0.76, p<0.001), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale ({rho} = 0.60, p<0.001), a Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test task ({tau}=0.55, p<0.001), 4-Stage Balance Test ({tau} = 0.55, p<0.001), and Short Physical Performance Battery ({tau} =0.57, p<0.001). StaBLE overcame ceiling effects in these existing scales and had a different underlying distribution for those identified at risk of falling and not (KS: 0.67, p<0.001). To reduce the time it takes to perform the test, we identified subsets of balance tasks that best predicted the StaBLE score across different populations. Together, our dataset, balance assessment protocol, and performance-based score demonstrate the validity of digital measures of balance.
ER  -