Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Treatment depth effects on settlement and deformation compatibility of dynamic compaction replacement foundations in coastal soft soil

Abstract

To investigate treatment-depth effects on settlement and deformation compatibility in coastal soft soil, a two-dimensional axisymmetric finite-element model was developed for the Huanhu Road section in Dongfang City. The dynamic compaction replacement region was represented as an equivalent linear-elastic improved zone within a total-stress framework, while two prescribed groundwater-depth cases were used only as auxiliary sensitivity checks of the adopted density-based representation. As treatment depth increased from 3.0 to 6.0 m, settlement in the treated area changed only slightly, whereas settlement in the adjacent untreated area increased from 0.252 to 0.350 m. Consequently, differential settlement increased from 0.052 to 0.132 m and the differential settlement ratio from 20.8 to 37.8%. Stress- and strain-response analyses indicate that this trend is associated with vertical stress redistribution and an increasing mismatch in compressive deformation between the treated and untreated areas. The 3.5–4.0 m cases showed a relatively balanced response between settlement control and deformation compatibility within the investigated range. This range is a model-based reference rather than a field-validated design recommendation.

Related

  1. A unified model embedding MCC-MLD constitutive laws in Biot’s framework for settlement of Weinan interbedded clay-sand loess foundations
    Weiguang Yang, Quanzhong Lu
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Crossref
  2. Biomechanical Compatibility With Physiological Limb-Flexion Deformation Reduces Inflammation and Neointimal Hyperplasia After Peripheral Stenting
    A. Kamenskiy, B. B. de Oliveira, A. Desyatova +5
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  3. Traction machine-induced soil compaction: A review of stress transmission, mitigation, and predictive modelling
    Hamza Mohieddinne, Carolina Ugarte
    Journal of TerramechanicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyHAL
  4. LSTM-based prediction and parameter optimization analysis of sandstone subgrade compaction quality
    Xi Li, Chenghu Xi, Yewei Zheng +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCrossref
  5. MacroH2A-mediated gene repression through nucleosome compaction and remodeling inhibition
    Vladyslava Sokolova, Rulan Jiang, Amber Mullins +3
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
BibTeX
@article{hong2026treatment,
  title = {{Treatment depth effects on settlement and deformation compatibility of dynamic compaction replacement foundations in coastal soft soil}},
  author = {Ke Hong and Jun Hu and Shang Jun Zhao and Ming Xiao and Lei Yang and Jun Hao Zhou},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-76337-8},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76337-8},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Treatment depth effects on settlement and deformation compatibility of dynamic compaction replacement foundations in coastal soft soil
AU  - Ke Hong
AU  - Jun Hu
AU  - Shang Jun Zhao
AU  - Ming Xiao
AU  - Lei Yang
AU  - Jun Hao Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-76337-8
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-76337-8
AB  - To investigate treatment-depth effects on settlement and deformation compatibility in coastal soft soil, a two-dimensional axisymmetric finite-element model was developed for the Huanhu Road section in Dongfang City. The dynamic compaction replacement region was represented as an equivalent linear-elastic improved zone within a total-stress framework, while two prescribed groundwater-depth cases were used only as auxiliary sensitivity checks of the adopted density-based representation. As treatment depth increased from 3.0 to 6.0 m, settlement in the treated area changed only slightly, whereas settlement in the adjacent untreated area increased from 0.252 to 0.350 m. Consequently, differential settlement increased from 0.052 to 0.132 m and the differential settlement ratio from 20.8 to 37.8%. Stress- and strain-response analyses indicate that this trend is associated with vertical stress redistribution and an increasing mismatch in compressive deformation between the treated and untreated areas. The 3.5–4.0 m cases showed a relatively balanced response between settlement control and deformation compatibility within the investigated range. This range is a model-based reference rather than a field-validated design recommendation.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -