Effects of Unilateral Leg Training Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells on Dynamic Balance and Muscle Activation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- 1Department of Convergence Sports Instruction, Hwashin Cyber University, Busan 47558, Republic of Korea.
- 2Department of Sports Health Convergence, Busan University of Foreign Studies, Busan 46234, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Background
Elastic barbells generate continuous, unpredictable perturbations through elastic deformation of the bar, delivering a top-down instability stimulus that transfers from the upper to the lower limbs. Whether repeated exposure produces training-related changes in muscle activation, and whether any postural control gains transfer to an untrained movement condition, remains unknown.Methods
Twenty-eight resistance-trained men (mean age 22.8 ± 1.6 years; experimental group (EG) 23.4 ± 1.4, control group (CG) 22.3 ± 1.7) were randomly assigned to train with an elastic barbell (EG, n = 14) or an inelastic barbell (CG, n = 14). Both completed an identical progressive unilateral leg training program twice weekly for 12 weeks (20-40% of one-repetition maximum). Pre- and post-intervention measures were the Y-Balance Test (YBT), centre of pressure (COP) displacement during single-leg deadlift (SLDL), and surface electromyography (%RVC) of seven trunk and lower-limb muscles across three lifting speeds. Data were analyzed with mixed-design ANOVA (α = 0.05).Results
The EG showed greater gains in dynamic balance; the post-intervention YBT composite score was significantly higher in the EG (102.55 ± 6.22%) than in the CG (90.65 ± 12.95%; Group × Time F(1, 26) = 7.25, p = 0.012). A significant Group × Time interaction for COP under the untrained inelastic barbell task (anterior-posterior F(1, 26) = 8.86, p = 0.006; medial-lateral F(1, 26) = 5.61, p = 0.026) indicated task-specific transfer of postural control. The semitendinosus was the only muscle with a significant Group × Time interaction in both barbell tasks, with activation decreasing in the EG and increasing in the CG.Conclusions
Elastic barbell training improved dynamic balance and altered lower-limb muscle activation more than inelastic barbell training, and the postural control benefit transferred to the same task performed with an untrained barbell. Because injury outcomes and motor-unit behaviour were not assessed, injury outcomes were not assessed; any application to injury prevention remains a hypothesis for future investigation.
Related
- Effects of plyometric training combined with tDCS on lower-limb muscle activation and cardiopulmonary function in male amateur soccer players: a randomized controlled trial
- Impact of neuromuscular and visuo-motor training on landing biomechanics, functional performance, and psychological factors in female athletes with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a simple parallel-group randomized controlled trial
- Unilateral flywheel resistance training versus traditional resistance training for change-of-direction performance in elite soccer players: a randomised controlled trial.
- Therapy onset and characteristics associated with improvement following HABIT-ILE in infants with unilateral cerebral palsy: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
- Combined cold atmospheric plasma and photobiomodulation is associated with improved early macroscopic and ultrasonographic wound-healing parameters after unilateral mastectomy in female dogs: an exploratory randomized intra-individual controlled clinical study.
BibTeX
@article{jeong2026effects,
title = {{Effects of Unilateral Leg Training Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells on Dynamic Balance and Muscle Activation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.}},
author = {Jihwan Jeong and Jayeon Lee and Chaekwan Lee and Shuho Kang and Ilbong Park},
journal = {Sports (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/sports14100450},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42931587},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effects of Unilateral Leg Training Using Elastic and Inelastic Barbells on Dynamic Balance and Muscle Activation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
AU - Jihwan Jeong
AU - Jayeon Lee
AU - Chaekwan Lee
AU - Shuho Kang
AU - Ilbong Park
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/12
JO - Sports (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/sports14100450
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42931587
AB - Background Elastic barbells generate continuous, unpredictable perturbations through elastic deformation of the bar, delivering a top-down instability stimulus that transfers from the upper to the lower limbs. Whether repeated exposure produces training-related changes in muscle activation, and whether any postural control gains transfer to an untrained movement condition, remains unknown.Methods Twenty-eight resistance-trained men (mean age 22.8 ± 1.6 years; experimental group (EG) 23.4 ± 1.4, control group (CG) 22.3 ± 1.7) were randomly assigned to train with an elastic barbell (EG, n = 14) or an inelastic barbell (CG, n = 14). Both completed an identical progressive unilateral leg training program twice weekly for 12 weeks (20-40% of one-repetition maximum). Pre- and post-intervention measures were the Y-Balance Test (YBT), centre of pressure (COP) displacement during single-leg deadlift (SLDL), and surface electromyography (%RVC) of seven trunk and lower-limb muscles across three lifting speeds. Data were analyzed with mixed-design ANOVA (α = 0.05).Results The EG showed greater gains in dynamic balance; the post-intervention YBT composite score was significantly higher in the EG (102.55 ± 6.22%) than in the CG (90.65 ± 12.95%; Group × Time F(1, 26) = 7.25, p = 0.012). A significant Group × Time interaction for COP under the untrained inelastic barbell task (anterior-posterior F(1, 26) = 8.86, p = 0.006; medial-lateral F(1, 26) = 5.61, p = 0.026) indicated task-specific transfer of postural control. The semitendinosus was the only muscle with a significant Group × Time interaction in both barbell tasks, with activation decreasing in the EG and increasing in the CG.Conclusions Elastic barbell training improved dynamic balance and altered lower-limb muscle activation more than inelastic barbell training, and the postural control benefit transferred to the same task performed with an untrained barbell. Because injury outcomes and motor-unit behaviour were not assessed, injury outcomes were not assessed; any application to injury prevention remains a hypothesis for future investigation.
SN - 2075-4663
ER -