Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0EcoEvoRxiv

Behavioural strategy and predator control: a coupled evolutionary predator-prey model for kiwi conservation in New Zealand

Abstract

Conservation management of endangered species can be enhanced by quantitative frameworks that simultaneously model behavioural adaptations alongside population dynamics. This paper presents a Coupled Evolutionary Predator-Prey Model (CEPPM) that integrates replicator dynamics from Evolutionary Game Theory with an extended Lotka-Volterra predator-prey framework, applied to kiwi (Apteryx spp.) under stoat (Mustela erminea) predation in New Zealand, with parameters grounded in published field data. We identify three analytically derived stoat-removal thresholds (h) that partition management outcomes into four qualitatively distinct regimes: below an effective kiwi recovery threshold h_survival ≈ 0.165, kiwi cannot begin recovery regardless of intervention timing; between h_survival and an analytical stoat suppression threshold h_crit = 0.25, kiwi recover while stoats persist at a low demographic floor; between h_crit and a true stoat eradication threshold h_erad ≈ 0.33, a "kiwi bonus zone" allows stoats to persist (counterintuitively, even as suppression intensifies) because the recovering kiwi population itself subsidises the remaining stoats as prey; and above h_erad, stoats are driven to zero regardless of kiwi abundance. Threshold locations are robust to parameter variation: across literature-derived ranges, h_crit varies 0.14–0.44, h_erad 0.21–0.51, and h_survival 0.07–0.33, with uncertainty driven primarily by stoat demography. The CEPPM incorporates lowering the risk of open foraging through predator suppression, thereby accelerating kiwi recovery. Open foraging proportions at equilibrium range from ≈44% under unmanaged predation to ≈76% under full stoat suppression, with an analytically derived survival-enabling proportion of ≈41%. This behavioural trajectory is a measurable conservation outcome in its own right, and its omission from population-only models risks over- or under-estimating recovery speed. Interlinking behavioural strategy evolution with population dynamics reveals a non-linear threshold structure and a behavioural dimension of recovery unavailable from either framework alone. Models of this kind can help conservation analyses better represent ecological processes and inform more precisely targeted policy decisions.

Related

  1. Beyond the curfew : Diurnal coral reef fish and mesopredator behavioural modifications under artificial light at night in the wild intensifies nocturnal predator-prey interactions
    Thibaut Roost, Erin Campbell-Hooper, Frédéric Zuberer +4
    Marine Pollution BulletinPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyHAL
  2. Eco-evolutionary cycles in a matching type predator-prey interaction
    Manon Costa, Peter Czuppon, Raphaël Forien
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textEvolutionary biologyProbabilityarXiv
  3. Intra-DNA k-mer conservation patterns encode evolutionary selection of variants
    Bernadette Mathew, Abhishek Halder, Nancy Jaiswal +10
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Evolutionary biologyMicrobiologyCrossrefCell Press
  4. Evolutionary decoupling of morphological and behavioural antipredator responses and their hormonal basis across anuran species
    Rafael Rico-Millan, H. Christoph Liedtke, Lee Hyeun-Ji +2
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyPMC
  5. Behavioural Diversity of Fishes: Concepts, Drivers and Its Role in Conservation and Management
    Marie Prchalová, Robert Arlinghaus, Samuel Westrelin +23
    Fish and FisheriesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@misc{sharma2026behavioural,
  title = {{Behavioural strategy and predator control: a coupled evolutionary predator-prey model for kiwi conservation in New Zealand}},
  author = {Sierra Sharma and Nagaja Sanatkumar},
  howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.32942/x2w67d},
  url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14923/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Behavioural strategy and predator control: a coupled evolutionary predator-prey model for kiwi conservation in New Zealand
AU  - Sierra Sharma
AU  - Nagaja Sanatkumar
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - EcoEvoRxiv
DO  - 10.32942/x2w67d
UR  - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14923/
AB  - Conservation management of endangered species can be enhanced by quantitative frameworks that simultaneously model behavioural adaptations alongside population dynamics. This paper presents a Coupled Evolutionary Predator-Prey Model (CEPPM) that integrates replicator dynamics from Evolutionary Game Theory with an extended Lotka-Volterra predator-prey framework, applied to kiwi (Apteryx spp.) under stoat (Mustela erminea) predation in New Zealand, with parameters grounded in published field data. We identify three analytically derived stoat-removal thresholds (h) that partition management outcomes into four qualitatively distinct regimes: below an effective kiwi recovery threshold h_survival ≈ 0.165, kiwi cannot begin recovery regardless of intervention timing; between h_survival and an analytical stoat suppression threshold h_crit = 0.25, kiwi recover while stoats persist at a low demographic floor; between h_crit and a true stoat eradication threshold h_erad ≈ 0.33, a "kiwi bonus zone" allows stoats to persist (counterintuitively, even as suppression intensifies) because the recovering kiwi population itself subsidises the remaining stoats as prey; and above h_erad, stoats are driven to zero regardless of kiwi abundance. Threshold locations are robust to parameter variation: across literature-derived ranges, h_crit varies 0.14–0.44, h_erad 0.21–0.51, and h_survival 0.07–0.33, with uncertainty driven primarily by stoat demography. The CEPPM incorporates lowering the risk of open foraging through predator suppression, thereby accelerating kiwi recovery. Open foraging proportions at equilibrium range from ≈44% under unmanaged predation to ≈76% under full stoat suppression, with an analytically derived survival-enabling proportion of ≈41%. This behavioural trajectory is a measurable conservation outcome in its own right, and its omission from population-only models risks over- or under-estimating recovery speed. Interlinking behavioural strategy evolution with population dynamics reveals a non-linear threshold structure and a behavioural dimension of recovery unavailable from either framework alone. Models of this kind can help conservation analyses better represent ecological processes and inform more precisely targeted policy decisions.
ER  -